Re: Time to delete old PostgreSQL from MacPorts?

2024-07-13 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 1:58 AM Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > > > > > On Jul 13, 2024, at 01:46, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > > > On Jul 12, 2024, at 4:54 PM, David Gilman wrote: > >> Is there any opposition to dropping all unsupported PostgreSQL > >> versions from MacPorts? That would be any

Re: More classes of maintainer

2023-11-08 Thread Eric Gallager
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 3:47 PM Clemens Lang wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 01:58:00PM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > > On 11/5/23 13:37, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > > To clarify - this was in the context of commits to base/ > > > > > > (That may or may not change your perception - but

Re: More classes of maintainer

2023-11-02 Thread Eric Gallager
I agree, I would just urge caution and a full examination of all the migration tools available; there are some projects that have done more successful migrations than others. For example, there was this one that made "mannequin" accounts of people so that the original commenters were preserved,

Re: More classes of maintainer (was: Re: branch master updated: nmap: fixes for 32-bit and pre-C++11 platforms)

2023-11-01 Thread Eric Gallager
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 9:54 PM Joshua Root wrote: > > On 2/11/2023 12:32, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > > As an aside, as it stands, the rules situation with closed maintainer / > > open maintainer is kind of unpleasant already. For example, I'd like to > > be able to indicate that I'm happy with

Re: `port archive` ?

2023-10-25 Thread Eric Gallager
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 7:29 AM René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On Monday October 23 2023 01:34:03 Eric Gallager wrote: > > >I sometimes try using the `port archive` command, and one thing I'm > >wondering about it is, why does it bother calculating conflicts if it > &

Re: `port archive` ?

2023-10-22 Thread Eric Gallager
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 1:38 PM Rainer Müller wrote: > > On 20/10/2023 15.14, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > It happens that I'd like to "install" a variant of a self-built port > > without actually activating it (e.g. when libraries are in use and I have > > no immediate need to activate that

Pull request against restore_ports.tcl

2023-01-01 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
Hi, I've had the following pull request against restore_ports.tcl in the macports-contrib repo open for a while and have been hoping someone could review it and/or merge it please: https://github.com/macports/macports-contrib/pull/10 Thanks, Eric Gallager

Re: having the "+test" or "+tests" variant propagate causes unexpected builds

2022-10-25 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 1:58 PM Ken Cunningham wrote: > > Various ports implement a “test” or “tests” variant to allow extra features > and deps required for testing to be enabled. > > This variant, when requested, will propagate up the chain to all the ports, > however. There is no real use

Re: Significant security vulnerability discovered in Log4j

2021-12-12 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 3:53 PM Nils Breunese wrote: > > Nils Breunese wrote: > > > Eric Gallager wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 4:57 AM Joshua Root wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2021-12-12 20:02 , Nils Breunese wrote: > >&g

Re: Significant security vulnerability discovered in Log4j

2021-12-11 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 6:00 PM Jason Liu wrote: > > In case everyone hadn't heard the news. If anyone is running Log4j for > logging on any of your web servers, you might want to read this. > > WIRED: 'The Internet Is On Fire' > A vulnerability in the Log4j logging framework has security teams

Re: gettext 0.21 update PR - FINAL CALL FOR FEEDBACK/OBJECTIONS

2021-11-28 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
Please merge it; thanks! On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 10:04 AM Christopher Nielsen wrote: > > Folks, our long-awaited update to ‘gettext’ 0.21 - via PR 7399 - can now move > forward: It was dependent on merging of foundational PR 7074 (update > 'python27-bootstrap’ to not use ‘gettext-bootstrap’),

Re: Add --disable-tls to GCC?

2021-11-13 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:24 PM Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: > > The file > ${prefix}/include/gcc6/c++/${build_arch}-apple-darwin${os.major}/bits/c++config.h > has different values for _GLIBCXX_HAVE_TLS on different platforms. > For ${os.major} < 15, _GLIBCXX_HAVE_TLS is defined as 1. > For

Re: Should CI/buildbot report rev-upgrade errors?

2021-10-11 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:59 PM Aaron Madlon-Kay wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 4:42 AM Eric Gallager via macports-dev > wrote: > > > > I agree that this behavior would be helpful, however, doing so would > > require keeping the results of previous builds ins

Re: Should CI/buildbot report rev-upgrade errors?

2021-09-06 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:42 PM Eric Gallager wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 11:30 AM Christopher Chavez wrote: > > > > Should CI/buildbots report any errors from `port rev-upgrade`? (I'm not > > aware that they already do.) > > > > Additionally, is it

Re: Should CI/buildbot report rev-upgrade errors?

2021-09-06 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 11:30 AM Christopher Chavez wrote: > > Should CI/buildbots report any errors from `port rev-upgrade`? (I'm not aware > that they already do.) > > Additionally, is it true that, once CI or a buildbot has built and installed > a port, `port rev-upgrade` should never report

Re: Freenode IRC

2021-05-19 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
Yeah I was trying to connect to Freenode the other day and was having some issues; if there are alternate chatting platforms that people are using instead, it'd be great to have those popularized. On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:44 AM Marius Schamschula wrote: > > It has come to my attention, on

Re: Homebrew Disables OSXFuse ports

2021-05-17 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
I like having Fuse ports available in MacPorts, I just wish they didn't break as often; see the following bugs: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/59316 https://trac.macports.org/ticket/62226 On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:55 AM Ruben Di Battista wrote: > > I also agree with Ryan. Osxfuse is a

Re: if we are going to support universal arm/x86_64 ports, we'll likely need a multi-architecture gcc again

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 1:21 PM Ken Cunningham < ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com> wrote: > I’m not sure if the MacPorts plan is to support universal arm/x86_64 > builds, but I can imagine that for some years we might want to consider > doing that. > > The last gcc version we had that supported

Re: pgf: objections to removing?

2020-07-11 Thread Eric Gallager via macports-dev
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 7:07 AM Dan Ports wrote: > The pgf port installs a latex package that would otherwise be in > texlive-pictures. It's been a separate port mostly for historical > reasons -- it predates our texlive ports. > > This port used to be maintained. It's a nomaintainer port now,

Re: gcc7/libgcc7 problems

2019-12-11 Thread Eric Gallager
On 12/11/19, Ken Cunningham wrote: > We're having troubles with the recent gcc7 upgrade to 7.5.0 on i386 > (bootstrapping with non-system assembler) and on 10.5 PPC (bus errors in > memory handling, possibly related to locale support, maybe some other thing > TBA). > > We may have to bump epoch

Re: [KDE/Mac] MacPorts usage statistics

2018-09-01 Thread Eric Gallager
ything, since I intended for it to only be temporary... which luckily it was! I did actually get my 10.6 machine fixed and am now sending this email from it. Eric Gallager

Re: Identifying possible situations for interactivity

2018-09-01 Thread Eric Gallager
So I was going thru my drafts folder and found this unsent message in it from a few years ago; much of it may no longer be relevant now that MacPorts has already added interactivity, but I figured I might as well send this anyways for the archives so what I wrote doesn't die stuck in my drafts.