Re: Call for designers for our ports website

Presumably we actually have more complete stats already if we were to aggregate the mirror logs for the distfiles + the binary archives. If we think having more data is valuable, we could add something to port (maybe display on selfupdate) asking people to opt-in. > On Jun 13, 2020, at 11:56

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

On 2020-6-14 05:38 , Craig Treleaven wrote: > Also, a quibble on the word “users”.  More than a few of our users > administer several systems that are all reporting statistics*.  We know > how many systems are submitting stats but we really don’t know the > number of individual users that

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

> On Jun 13, 2020, at 2:24 PM, Arjun Salyan wrote: > > Thank you for the mockup and the inputs. > > http://macports.silentfox.tech/port/gnuplot/stats/?days=365 > my version of > it does not look as good as yours probably due to a

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

Thank you for the mockup and the inputs. http://macports.silentfox.tech/port/gnuplot/stats/?days=365 my version of it does not look as good as yours probably due to a larger amount of data. Thank you

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

sorry —we’re 835 openssl installs. wrong drop-down. K > On Jun 13, 2020, at 8:56 AM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > No doubt it caused some tempest. > > I was wrong, homebrew’s published stats say they have 5 million openssl > installs this year

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

No doubt it caused some tempest. I was wrong, homebrew’s published stats say they have 5 million openssl installs this year > and our analytics say we have 547

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

Hi y'all, I was a core Homebrew maintainer at the time they added analytics. Just want to say that Saagar is right; there were a *lot* of Homebrew users who did in fact have a problem with it. Cheers, Andrwe On 6/12/20 9:03 PM, Saagar Jha wrote: > I believe the lack of change there is almost

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

> On Jun 12, 2020, at 10:30 PM, Arjun Salyan wrote: > > Hi Craig, > > Thank you. You make a valid point regarding the possible distortion due to > weekly submissions being bundled to calculate monthly charts. > > But what we are seeing here is a known issue with the query that calculates >

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

On 2020-6-13 12:18 , Arjun Salyan wrote: > Hi Clemens, > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 4:46 AM Clemens Lang > wrote: > > Please keep in mind that we do value URL stability. Specifically, I've > recently added redirects so that our old ports.php script will now >

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

Hi Craig, Thank you. You make a valid point regarding the possible distortion due to weekly submissions being bundled to calculate monthly charts. But what we are seeing here is a known issue with the query that calculates this chart. https://github.com/macports/macports-webapp/issues/79 The

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

Hi Clemens, On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 4:46 AM Clemens Lang wrote: > Please keep in mind that we do value URL stability. Specifically, I've > recently added redirects so that our old ports.php script will now > redirect the various links that are out there on upstream websites to >

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

> On Jun 12, 2020, at 6:03 PM, Saagar Jha wrote: > > I believe the lack of change there is almost certainly a matter of the > project’s personal stance rather than “nobody having a problem with it”. "sufficient to make them change that policy" > Personally, I would be fairly disappointed if

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

I believe the lack of change there is almost certainly a matter of the project’s personal stance rather than “nobody having a problem with it”. In fact, after the change was merged in there was a fairly long discussion about first disclosing that there were analytics collected at all (which did

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

Just FYI Homebrew has always been opt-out for stats. Nobody seems to have a problem with that sufficient to make them change that policy. We'll never know if that is why they seem to have 10 x the users on their stats page. K

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

Hi Mojca, Arjun, On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 07:24:49PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > - http://macports.silentfox.tech/search/?installed_file==root=on Please keep in mind that we do value URL stability. Specifically, I've recently added redirects so that our old ports.php script will now redirect

Fwd: Call for designers for our ports website

Sorry, intended to send this to the dev list... > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Craig Treleaven > Subject: Re: Call for designers for our ports website > Date: June 12, 2020 at 2:31:52 PM EDT > To: Mojca Miklavec > >> On Jun 12, 2020, at 1:24 PM, Mojca M

Call for designers for our ports website

Dear MacPorters, As part of a GSOC project Arjun has been working on great new features for our web application with information about ports. The application from last year has been deployed at https://ports.macports.org/ while the new testing site is temporarily located at