open source licensing of maemo 5 example code MIT vs GPL

2009-08-29 Thread gary liquid
hi, I am interested in picking up some of the examples from the maemoexamples collection provided by nokia. ( https://garage.maemo.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/trunk/?root=maemoexamples) When I went looking, I find many are licensed under a permissive MIT license. this is great and open source

Re: open source licensing of maemo 5 example code MIT vs GPL

2009-08-29 Thread gary liquid
haha maybe i should have opened my eyes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License /thread before it even started On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:19 AM, gary liquid liq...@gmail.com wrote: hi, I am interested in picking up some of the examples from the maemoexamples collection provided by nokia.

Re: open source licensing of maemo 5 example code MIT vs GPL

2009-08-29 Thread Simón Pena
I'm not an expert, so I'd wait for another opinion, but take a look at this: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/#Expat I think it's the same license, and they say they're compatible. 2009/8/29 gary liquid liq...@gmail.com: hi, I am interested in picking up some of the examples from the

Re: open source licensing of maemo 5 example code MIT vs GPL

2009-08-29 Thread Jason Edgecombe
I believe MIT and GPL are compatible: See http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#X11License This license is sometimes called the /MIT license/, but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software Simón Pena wrote: I'm not an expert, so I'd wait for

Re: Subversion and libesd?

2009-08-29 Thread Jeremiah Foster
On Aug 28, 2009, at 13:53, Graham Cobb wrote: On Thursday 27 August 2009 23:23:57 Jeremiah Foster wrote: It has gone through the builder, but has not shown up in the file system as a deb yet. It still hasn't shown up in the repository. libsoup2.4 is in the SDK - can you use that? Jeremiah

Re: Proposal: XSBC-Bugtracker in debian package

2009-08-29 Thread Ryan Abel
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Graham Cobbg+...@cobb.uk.net wrote: I presume a garage tracker is an acceptable URL.  If Ed ever gets the chance to do his autobuild from garage proposal he could default this to the associated tracker! Acceptable, but probably not preferable. I'd like to see

Re: Proposal: XSBC-Bugtracker in debian package

2009-08-29 Thread Graham Cobb
On Saturday 29 August 2009 16:23:43 Ryan Abel wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Graham Cobbg+...@cobb.uk.net wrote: I presume a garage tracker is an acceptable URL.  If Ed ever gets the chance to do his autobuild from garage proposal he could default this to the associated tracker!

Re: Subversion and libesd?

2009-08-29 Thread Graham Cobb
On Saturday 29 August 2009 15:08:43 Jeremiah Foster wrote: On Aug 28, 2009, at 13:53, Graham Cobb wrote: On Thursday 27 August 2009 23:23:57 Jeremiah Foster wrote: It has gone through the builder, but has not shown up in the file system as a deb yet. It still hasn't shown up in the

Re: Proposal: XSBC-Bugtracker in debian package

2009-08-29 Thread Ryan Abel
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Graham Cobbg+...@cobb.uk.net wrote: On Saturday 29 August 2009 16:23:43 Ryan Abel wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Graham Cobbg+...@cobb.uk.net wrote: I presume a garage tracker is an acceptable URL.  If Ed ever gets the chance to do his autobuild