Hi!
>>I have no idea what scratchbox version you had installed but 0.9 was
>>indeed much more than "a bit" painfull on unstable debian.
>
> I'm using stable Debian not unstable. Does that make a difference to the
> level of pain?
Yes :) I think debian unstable ( sid ) should be best choice here.
On Tuesday, February 06, 2007, at 08:05PM, "Piotr Pokora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>>>This is contrary to my experience. I was able to install xephyr on
>>>debian/sid with zero problems ( apt-get install xserver-xephyr ).
>>
>> Considering I'm not running the unstable sid release I'd
Hi,
>>This is contrary to my experience. I was able to install xephyr on
>>debian/sid with zero problems ( apt-get install xserver-xephyr ).
>
> Considering I'm not running the unstable sid release I'd expect this to be
> the case. It would appear that trying to install Xephyr on stable results
On Tuesday, February 06, 2007, at 04:19PM, "Levi Bard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> As an aside , installing xephyr on Debian from unstable seems to be a
>> complete non-starter without ripping out all of your other x apps and
>> windowing system and a replacing a whole host of other packages
As an aside , installing xephyr on Debian from unstable seems to be a complete
non-starter without ripping out all of your other x apps and windowing system
and a replacing a whole host of other packages as well. So I tried XNest
instead which has the benefit of being installable and working. U
This weekend I decided to brush up my meagre developer skills, starting by
seeing if I could build one of the hello world style apps to run on my N800.
Unfortunately it proved to be an almost completely fruitless exercise, other
than providing me with a working Debian installation in a Parallels
