On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 16:02 +0100, pancake wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:01:28PM +, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> > On Jan 16, 2008 1:04 PM, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > It sounds like the people who wrote HildonCalendar should work on a new
>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:01:28PM +, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2008 1:04 PM, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It sounds like the people who wrote HildonCalendar should work on a new
> > > calendar widget to go in upstream GTK+.
> >
> > Do
On Jan 16, 2008 1:04 PM, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It sounds like the people who wrote HildonCalendar should work on a new
> > calendar widget to go in upstream GTK+.
>
> Do you really think a calendar widget fits with GTK?
>
> IMHO it's a far com
> It sounds like the people who wrote HildonCalendar should work on a new
> calendar widget to go in upstream GTK+.
Do you really think a calendar widget fits with GTK?
IMHO it's a far complex widget and have to live out of the core lib.
__
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 10:20 +0200, Markku Vire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As your option two describes: Previous versions of Hildon contained a
> patch for GtkCalendar that made it fit better to the environment. Now
> this custom implementation is known as HildonCalendar. Other
> (non-hi
Hi,
As your option two describes: Previous versions of Hildon contained a
patch for GtkCalendar that made it fit better to the environment. Now
this custom implementation is known as HildonCalendar. Other
(non-hildon) environments can continue to use GtkCalendar as earlier.
Too bad that this
I am currently trying to tidy up some things reported by the hildon-audit
tool. One thing it has reported is:
gtk_calendar_new: GtkCalendar is deprecated, use HildonCalendar from hildon-1:
see http://live.gnome.org/Maemo/Gtk210Migration#M14
I have looked at that URL but it doesn't help
