Dave Neary schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Faheem Pervez wrote:
>> You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
>> already violating the GPL.
>
> I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
> that the GPL is a distribution licence. That's why we don't get all
> Goo
Oops. Forgot to CC him.
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 14:33 +0200, ext e...@okerson.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Faheem Pervez wrote:
> >> You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
> >> already violating the GPL.
>
> > Dave Neary wrote:
> > I don't know the details of the situation.
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 14:33 +0200, ext e...@okerson.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Faheem Pervez wrote:
> >> You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
> >> already violating the GPL.
>
> > Dave Neary wrote:
> > I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
Hi,
>-Original Message-
>From: ext Frantisek Dufka [mailto:duf...@seznam.cz]
>Sent: 02 July, 2009 15:54
>To: Dave Neary
>Cc: Faheem Pervez; maemo-developers@maemo.org; Tikka Jarmo
>(Nokia-D/Helsinki)
>Subject: Re: closed tools, Re: Maemo Flasher-3.5 Tool Beta for
Dave Neary wrote:
> I've seen people say that Nokia doesn't even distribute the initfs
> tools. If that's the case, there wouldn't be any GPL violation.
Let's move detailed discussion back to the bug report.
Quick and hopefully correct summary is that Nokia is distributing
modified uclibc (EABI
> Hi,
>
> Faheem Pervez wrote:
>> You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
>> already violating the GPL.
> Dave Neary wrote:
> I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
> that the GPL is a distribution licence. That's why we don't get all
> Google
Hi,
I'm certainly far from being a licensing expert. But there is a
paragraph on a page at the busybox site which does make it clear wrt
busybox and releasing source: http://www.busybox.net/license.html
I see a /mnt/initfs/bin/busybox but I don't see the source available
for the busybox 1.00 used
Hi,
Faheem Pervez wrote:
> You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
> already violating the GPL.
I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
that the GPL is a distribution licence. That's why we don't get all
Google's changes to the Linux kernel an
(Well, s/you/Nokia/)
On 7/2/09, Faheem Pervez wrote:
> You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
> already violating the GPL.
>
> On 7/2/09, jarmo.ti...@nokia.com wrote:
>> And I do not
>> belive we have any plans to release toolchain for initfs development for
>> Diablo a
You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
already violating the GPL.
On 7/2/09, jarmo.ti...@nokia.com wrote:
> And I do not
> belive we have any plans to release toolchain for initfs development for
> Diablo anymore.
>
> Cheers,
> //Jarmo
> _
Hi,
>-Original Message-
>From: ext Frantisek Dufka [mailto:duf...@seznam.cz]
>Sent: 02 July, 2009 09:46
>Fremantle and Diablo released
>
>jarmo.ti...@nokia.com wrote:
>
>> BTW I think flasher is the only closed source tool we have
>in maemo development environment. Or at least I do not
jarmo.ti...@nokia.com wrote:
> BTW I think flasher is the only closed source tool we have in maemo
> development environment. Or at least I do not know any other binary only tool
> :).
>
I think gcc/uclibc toolchain for initfs development would qualify but it
is much worse here, we even don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
