That is completely correct, there are major difference between *nix
operating system and Windows. not even on the technical leve but on the
quality of deisgn and approach
Regards
Samer Azmy
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Farrell J. McGovern <
farrell.mcgov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ScottW wrote:
On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Farrell J. McGovern wrote:
> ScottW wrote:
>> The Mac and *nix world needs to stop gloating about their clean
>> record so far and keep an eye out for what is to come. Dues to the
>> learning curve of the OS, the users were more "enlightened" than
>> the common
I would want to see SVG files and of course to be able to zoom in or out these
files.
I have succeeded to see an SVG file with Fennec but I am unable to zoom it.
Is there an extension to Fennec to do that or another Maemo software to see and
zoom SVG files ?
DC
Greetings All,
Please take this thread to a more appropriate list, it has very little
to do with tablet usage at this point. It might be better suited to the
SecurityFocus Security Basics list, for example. Subscription info below:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/105/description#0.3.1
T
While I hate OS wars; it's like taking to your cat. This was a well thought
out response and worth reading.
Thanks,
Denis
--
sik vis paw kem, para bellum
--
oderint dum metuant
--
"Our Coun
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Farrell J. McGovern
wrote:
> ScottW wrote:
>> The Mac and *nix world needs to stop gloating about their clean record so
>> far and keep an eye out for what is to come. Dues to the learning curve of
>> the OS, the users were more "enlightened" than the common co
Hello
root user is not the absolute power any more, please dont forget SELINUX and
the MLS "Multi Level Seurity"
you can read more on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selinux
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Farrell J. McGovern
> wrote:
> > ScottW
2009/3/10 Olavo Junior :
>
> lala$ tablet-encode -p best 1234567890.mp4 foo.avi
> ...
>
> lala$ du -ms foo.avi
> 1 foo.avi
Would it be possible for you to send me the video (1234567890.mp4, in
your example)? Does it play if you do:
$ mplayer 1234567890.mp4
Thanks in advance,
Andrew
-
All,
the post at the www page whose url is
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10470711/1/rim-apple-feast-on-nokia.html
frames the experience I had today.
While seated at a luncheon following a technical meeting
(Cisco/VMware/Netapp/etc) I duly noted that I was among a crowd (that
would be
they likely don't care about multi-tasking until you give a concrete example
of a multi-tasking scenario: say, listening to mp3s while using IM. Or,
switching between browsing, IM, and [your favourite iPhone app here].
concepts like multi-tasking tend to go over most people's heads until an
exam
Scott wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Farrell J. McGovern wrote:
>
>
>> ScottW wrote:
>>
>>> The Mac and *nix world needs to stop gloating about their clean
>>> record so far and keep an eye out for what is to come. Dues to the
>>> learning curve of the OS, the users were more "
Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Farrell J. McGovern
> wrote:
>
>> ScottW wrote:
>>
>>> The Mac and *nix world needs to stop gloating about their clean record so
>>> far and keep an eye out for what is to come. Dues to the learning curve of
>>> the OS, the users were more
Jean-Christian,
interesting. And from the diagram I see your point.
Of course the N95 is a full function mobile phone and based on that N95
diagram I would expect that the heavy lifting of the 3G voice and HSPA
protocols for voice and non-voice (packet) data above the physical layer
would be i
Kevin,
agreed. A more indepth discussion with some of those other users would
have provided the opportunity to reveal that value associated with a
Linux based mobile device.
Now I have to wonder, does the iphone OS support multitasking?Is it a
stripped down version of OS X? I;ll do some readin
James Knott wrote:
> Ummm... Given that "DOS" didn't appear until 1981, there's no way
> Windows could have been around 30+ years ago. That would have been the
> days of CP/M and Apple II.
Sorry, that should have been 20+... 24 to be more precise. Momentary lapse in
brain function.
> Back in t
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 22:15 -0600, Mark Haury wrote:
> James Knott wrote:
> Windows doesn't need (never has, and never will) to have the capability for
> simultaneous users. What would be the point? As PCs continue to shrink in
> size
> as they increase in power, it makes a lot more sense for ev
16 matches
Mail list logo