ThinLinc from www.cendio.com is a perfect
alternative to Citrix which also works perfectly
on *nix software. It is built on open source product
and offers a very cheap and more reliable solution
compared to Citrix.
BR Henrik
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 07:22:26AM -0400, James Knott wrote:
George
James Knott wrote:
George Farris wrote:
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 22:15 -0600, Mark Haury wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Windows doesn't need (never has, and never will) to have the capability for
simultaneous users. What would be the point? As PCs continue to shrink in
size
as they increase
kenneth marken wrote:
hell, the story goes that microsoft killed of smart displays as it
would be a cheap way to do multi-user on xp home. something that would
undermine their more expensive multi-user licenses on win2k3 (where,
iirc, you pay ones for the os, and ones for the number of users
George Farris wrote:
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 22:15 -0600, Mark Haury wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Windows doesn't need (never has, and never will) to have the capability for
simultaneous users. What would be the point? As PCs continue to shrink in
size
as they increase in power, it makes a
Henrik Madsen wrote:
ThinLinc from www.cendio.com is a perfect
alternative to Citrix which also works perfectly
on *nix software. It is built on open source product
and offers a very cheap and more reliable solution
compared to Citrix.
I'm not familiar with that, but it's still an add
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:16 PM, George Farris farr...@shaw.ca wrote:
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 22:15 -0600, Mark Haury wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Windows doesn't need (never has, and never will) to have the capability for
simultaneous users. What would be the point? As PCs continue to shrink in
Mark wrote:
From:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/french-police-saves-millions-of-euros-by-adopting-ubuntu.ars
Games are not our priority
I guess they're not into Cops and Robbers. ;-)
--
Use OpenOffice.org http://www.openoffice.org
John Holmblad a écrit :
Jean-Christian,
interesting. And from the diagram I see your point.
Of course the N95 is a full function mobile phone and based on that N95
diagram I would expect that the heavy lifting of the 3G voice and HSPA
protocols for voice and non-voice (packet) data
That is completely correct, there are major difference between *nix
operating system and Windows. not even on the technical leve but on the
quality of deisgn and approach
Regards
Samer Azmy
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Farrell J. McGovern
farrell.mcgov...@gmail.com wrote:
ScottW wrote:
On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Farrell J. McGovern wrote:
ScottW wrote:
The Mac and *nix world needs to stop gloating about their clean
record so far and keep an eye out for what is to come. Dues to the
learning curve of the OS, the users were more enlightened than
the common computer
Greetings All,
Please take this thread to a more appropriate list, it has very little
to do with tablet usage at this point. It might be better suited to the
SecurityFocus Security Basics list, for example. Subscription info below:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/105/description#0.3.1
While I hate OS wars; it's like taking to your cat. This was a well thought
out response and worth reading.
Thanks,
Denis
--
sik vis paw kem, para bellum
--
oderint dum metuant
--
Our
Hello
root user is not the absolute power any more, please dont forget SELINUX and
the MLS Multi Level Seurity
you can read more on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selinux
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Farrell J. McGovern
Scott wrote:
On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Farrell J. McGovern wrote:
ScottW wrote:
The Mac and *nix world needs to stop gloating about their clean
record so far and keep an eye out for what is to come. Dues to the
learning curve of the OS, the users were more enlightened than
Mark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Farrell J. McGovern
farrell.mcgov...@gmail.com wrote:
ScottW wrote:
The Mac and *nix world needs to stop gloating about their clean record so
far and keep an eye out for what is to come. Dues to the learning curve of
the OS, the
Jean-Christian,
interesting. And from the diagram I see your point.
Of course the N95 is a full function mobile phone and based on that N95
diagram I would expect that the heavy lifting of the 3G voice and HSPA
protocols for voice and non-voice (packet) data above the physical layer
would be
James Knott wrote:
Ummm... Given that DOS didn't appear until 1981, there's no way
Windows could have been around 30+ years ago. That would have been the
days of CP/M and Apple II.
Sorry, that should have been 20+... 24 to be more precise. Momentary lapse in
brain function.
Back in the
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 22:15 -0600, Mark Haury wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Windows doesn't need (never has, and never will) to have the capability for
simultaneous users. What would be the point? As PCs continue to shrink in
size
as they increase in power, it makes a lot more sense for
Mark wrote:
You're putting words in my mouth. I never said that. I said that they
were either Linux or Mac fanboys OR were simply targeting the most
common OS.
I don't personally disagree with Mark's statement, except for the
wording. I would have put it as:
But NOT impossible, and the
Mark wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:02 PM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:14 PM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Bottom line, there are a lot of technical and usage reasons that make it
much harder for malware to
John Holmblad wrote:
James,
as you are well aware, a user of a Microsoft Desktop or Server OS is not
required to use Outlook for email. Mozilla Thunderbird works quite well
on Microsoft OS's and of course there is Evolution.
I am well aware that you can use other mail applications.
John Holmblad a écrit :
http://www.smta.org/files/CTEA_High_Density_Pkg_Trends-Carey-Portelligent.pdf
You can see, from viewing the iphone PCB discussed on pp 13-17 of that
presentation. that, in addition to having separate power amps for each
of 3 frequency band groupings (it is a quad
Jean-Christian de Rivaz a écrit :
Nokia will more likely use this kind of integration:
http://www.phonewreck.com/wiki/index.php?title=Nokia_N95#Block_Diagram
The Quad-band GSM/GPRS/EDGE + Dual-band UMTS/HSPDA chain use 1 chip for
the baseband, 1 chip for the transceiver and 1 chip for the
The biggest fault in any computer to make a virus successful is the part
between the keyboard and chair. I am quite sure that no one reading this email
falls for that pop up window from Anti-Virus2009 that says your computer is
infected and click here to run a virus scanner (but you probably
ScottW wrote:
The Mac and *nix world needs to stop gloating about their clean record so far
and keep an eye out for what is to come. Dues to the learning curve of the
OS, the users were more enlightened than the common computer user, but now
these are more wide spread and the common user
John Holmblad a écrit :
Jean-Christian,
the term 3g radio is a fairly broad term. The key is what software is
going to be in the new G4 IT above the radio/physical layer. It would
make sense, especially if Nokia decides that the G4 IT is going to go
after the market served by the
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:56:48PM -0600, Mark wrote:
And the only reason that Linux and Macs are so relatively safe from
viruses and worms is because they aren't targeted, not because they
are fundamentally more secure.
This would make sense if creating a virus required a significant
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:14 PM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Bottom line, there are a lot of technical and usage reasons that make it
much harder for malware to attack Linux/Unix.
But NOT impossible, and the fact remains that the overwhelming
majority of malware writers are either
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:21 AM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
basically, the only really safe option is to yank that plug, and use
only home-coded apps...
Provided you *never* make any mistakes or overlook any bugs... ;-)
Mark
___
kenneth marken wrote:
Bottom line, there are a lot of technical and usage reasons that make it
much harder for malware to attack Linux/Unix.
the big problem here is that the target for said malware have
changed...
its no longer about bringing down whole systems. these days its the
users
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:14 PM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Bottom line, there are a lot of technical and usage reasons that make it
much harder for malware to attack Linux/Unix.
But NOT impossible, and the fact remains that the overwhelming
majority of
James,
as you are well aware, a user of a Microsoft Desktop or Server OS is not
required to use Outlook for email. Mozilla Thunderbird works quite well
on Microsoft OS's and of course there is Evolution.
I should add that, just as Microsoft has mitigated/eliminated well known
vulnerabilities
John Holmblad a écrit :
[...]
On the other hand mobile service providers who are evolving from GSM to
3G/UMTS can, if they so choose, start to move their voice traffic over
to their UMTS infrastructure (equipment and RF) and do so gradually by
providing their customers with dual mode 2g/3g
, but
nowadays we enable it only sometimes when discussing with our young
nieces, for 99%[1] of the calls voice is enough.
As this thread is Nokia device usage, what you would use
the Skype video for? :-)
- Eero
[1] of the _time_ used for all the calls video part might be more,
the calls
Eero Tamminen wrote:
As this thread is Nokia device usage, what you would use
the Skype video for? :-)
Mainly to communicate with my family when on business travel, but also to put
in touch my kids (2 and 4 year old) and their grand mother (11000 km away)
without requiring them to stay
Alejandro López wrote:
Eero Tamminen wrote:
As this thread is Nokia device usage, what you would use
the Skype video for? :-)
Mainly to communicate with my family when on business travel, but also to put
in touch my kids (2 and 4 year old) and their grand mother (11000 km away)
without
kenneth marken wrote:
Alejandro López wrote:
Eero Tamminen wrote:
As this thread is Nokia device usage, what you would use
the Skype video for? :-)
Mainly to communicate with my family when on business travel, but also
to put in touch my kids (2 and 4 year old) and their grand mother
Fernando Cassia wrote:
A couple points:
1. Apple makes proprietary, closed solutions. Try to reverse engineer
Apple´s firmware for compatibility reasons and you´ll see Apple
lawyers coming to get you.
They've found there's a broad end-user market for stuff that meets a
certain ease of
lakestevensdental wrote:
Fernando Cassia wrote:
A couple points:
1. Apple makes proprietary, closed solutions. Try to reverse engineer
Apple´s firmware for compatibility reasons and you´ll see Apple
lawyers coming to get you.
They've found there's a broad end-user market for stuff that
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:29 PM, lakestevensdental
lakestevensden...@verizon.net wrote:
\ Good luck carrying that non-Apple albatross around your neck... It's
not like there's nothing to learn from the successful.
Always, Fred C
...or non-Micro$oft, or non-Linux, or... it all depends on
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:29 PM, lakestevensdental
lakestevensden...@verizon.net wrote:
\ Good luck carrying that non-Apple albatross around your neck... It's
not like there's nothing to learn from the successful.
Always, Fred C
...or non-Micro$oft, or non-Linux,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:43 PM, lakestevensdental
lakestevensden...@verizon.net wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:29 PM, lakestevensdental
lakestevensden...@verizon.net wrote:
\ Good luck carrying that non-Apple albatross around your neck... It's
not like there's nothing to learn
Mark,
re your comment
Managing repositories is far beyond the
understanding of the average consumer. Installing apps from source
code is even less user-friendly. Far too many important apps must be
installed with apt-get from the command line and don't show up at all
in
Mark wrote:
And the only reason that Linux and Macs are so relatively safe from
viruses and worms is because they aren't targeted, not because they
are fundamentally more secure.
Well, considering that most web sites run Apache on Linux or Unix, I'm
not so sure about that. And if you
Jean-Christian,
the term 3g radio is a fairly broad term. The key is what software is
going to be in the new G4 IT above the radio/physical layer. It would
make sense, especially if Nokia decides that the G4 IT is going to go
after the market served by the iphone, to give the G4 IT, full
Andrew Flegg a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz j...@eclis.ch wrote:
I don't understand why the next tablet will not be able to make regular
phone call, since it will have 3G link. It's a non sense.
You seem awfully sure about the features of a device which has
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz j...@eclis.ch wrote:
From what I can find on the net, HSPA seem to be an extend of the 3G. So it
seem logical to me that the next tablet will have 3G radio.
Yup, that's practically assured. However, you were also talking about
how it
Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz j...@eclis.ch wrote:
I don't understand why the next tablet will not be able to make regular
phone call, since it will have 3G link. It's a non sense.
You seem awfully sure about the features of a device which has
John Holmblad wrote:
Andrew,
yes, I am being overly presumptuous as to what kind of radio technology
will and will not be in the next turn of the IT hardware. I must have
read it somewhere that it was going to be HSDPA only.
HSDPA do not result in data only, as HSDPA only builds on
kenneth,
I have not read the HSDPA spec myself but my assumption is that it is
all packet, all the time As the P implies in HSDPA
UMTS, as a superset of HSDPA incorporates various QOS and other
features (roaming, voice connection awareness, etc) that are needed in
order to properly
John Holmblad a écrit :
Jean-Chirstian,
you have put into words a good operational definition of the mass market
for the context of this discussion, that is:
...people that don't have some technical orientation
Like many companies, Nokia seems to have been fooled into
See online reply.
Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Mar 2009, at 02:08, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:37 PM, John Holmblad
jholmb...@acadiasecurenets.com wrote:
I for one would like to see Apple acquire Nokia. That would be a
great
combination.
A couple
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:06:58PM +, Matt Emson wrote:
3. Apple does not support Free Software in general
(if you know any Apple software released under the GNU GPL Free
Software license, let me know)
that puts it at odds with the N8xx tablets Linux OS foundation.
Free software
Mark,
You can substitute Motorola cell phones for Nokia tablets and
your arguments will remain valid. Hardware is easier than software.
julius
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Mark wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
John, you wrote:
[snip]
I have to
Matt Emson wrote:
See online reply.
Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Mar 2009, at 02:08, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:37 PM, John Holmblad
jholmb...@acadiasecurenets.com wrote:
I for one would like to see Apple acquire Nokia. That would be a
great
hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:06:58PM +, Matt Emson wrote:
3. Apple does not support Free Software in general
(if you know any Apple software released under the GNU GPL Free
Software license, let me know)
that puts it at odds with the N8xx tablets Linux OS
Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Mar 2009, at 16:05, Julius Szelagiewicz jul...@turtle.com wrote:
Mark,
You can substitute Motorola cell phones for Nokia tablets and
your arguments will remain valid. Hardware is easier than software.
julius
Now, that's just plain mean!! No company makes
Jean-Christian,
you are, of course, correct in that Nokia has had tremendous success
with mass market mobile phones but not PDA's or IT's.
Nokia might do well run the following experiment (in situ if you will)
to get a better (and sooner than 2 more generations from now) grasp
John Holmblad a écrit :
Jean-Christian,
Perhaps the forthcoming G4 of the IT, with its HSDPA support, if and
when it is released, will eliminate the need for the handset altogether
for those intrepid enough to replace their GSM voice provider with a
provider of SIP trunking services.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, John Holmblad
jholmb...@acadiasecurenets.com wrote:
Jean-Christian,
you are, of course, correct in that Nokia has had tremendous success
with mass market mobile phones but not PDA's or IT's.
Nokia might do well run the following experiment (in
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz j...@eclis.ch wrote:
I don't understand why the next tablet will not be able to make regular
phone call, since it will have 3G link. It's a non sense.
You seem awfully sure about the features of a device which has yet to
be announced, let
Andrew,
yes, I am being overly presumptuous as to what kind of radio technology
will and will not be in the next turn of the IT hardware. I must have
read it somewhere that it was going to be HSDPA only.
.
Best Regards,
John Holmblad
Acadia Secure Networks, LLC
Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:41:04PM -0700, Mark wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, John Holmblad
jholmb...@acadiasecurenets.com wrote:
Jean-Christian,
you are, of course, correct in that Nokia has had tremendous success
with mass market mobile phones but not PDA's or
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:48:26AM -0700, Mark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Abel rabe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Mark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@pov.lt wrote:
Overall, the current generations of NITs are far from
Hi,
ext OgnenD wrote:
It is too slow when browsing the net (compared to, for example, my Asus
EEE or my laptop).
Oh great, you are comparing an ultra low-power 320MHZ ARM CPU (RISC)
vs a 1Ghz x86 CISC.
It is not about computational power comparison, it is about functionality. If
I can
Eero Tamminen wrote:
Hi,
ext OgnenD wrote:
It is too slow when browsing the net (compared to, for example, my
Asus
EEE or my laptop).
Oh great, you are comparing an ultra low-power 320MHZ ARM CPU (RISC)
vs a 1Ghz x86 CISC.
It is not about computational power comparison, it is about
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:48:26AM -0700, Mark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Abel rabe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Mark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@pov.lt wrote:
Overall,
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@pov.lt wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:48:26AM -0700, Mark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Abel rabe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Mark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Marius Gedminas
On Mar 6, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Mark wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@pov.lt wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:48:26AM -0700, Mark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Abel rabe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Mark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5,
Mark wrote:
Sure, they say it, after you've already bought the thing and are on
a mailing list and a discussion such as this comes up, but NOWHERE in
the sales literature or at any sales point that I've seen does it say
that. That little morsel is *not* freely disseminated.
I'm trying to stay
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Matt Emson mem...@interalpha.co.uk wrote:
I'm trying to stay out of this discussion, because it is a circular
argument - no one will win because there is no simple correct stance.
And now we've both failed at that :-)
The N800 was never sold as anything *but*
2009/3/6 Matt Emson mem...@interalpha.co.uk:
Mark wrote:
Sure, they say it, after you've already bought the thing and are on
a mailing list and a discussion such as this comes up, but NOWHERE in
the sales literature or at any sales point that I've seen does it say
that. That little morsel is
Aniello Del Sorbo wrote:
2009/3/6 Matt Emson mem...@interalpha.co.uk:
Mark wrote:
Sure, they say it, after you've already bought the thing and are on
a mailing list and a discussion such as this comes up, but NOWHERE in
the sales literature or at any sales point that I've seen does
Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Matt Emson mem...@interalpha.co.uk wrote:
I'm trying to stay out of this discussion, because it is a circular
argument - no one will win because there is no simple correct stance.
And now we've both failed at that :-)
The
the bike comes with a subscription to a community repair shop and new
elements are being created for it every day.
it includes out of the box an expansive toolkit able to mend and repair
anything on your bike.
A new water bottle was designed for the bike which actually allows you to
continuously
2009/3/6 Ognen Duzlevski og...@naniteworld.com:
Aniello Del Sorbo wrote:
2009/3/6 Matt Emson mem...@interalpha.co.uk:
Mark wrote:
Sure, they say it, after you've already bought the thing and are on
a mailing list and a discussion such as this comes up, but NOWHERE in
the sales literature
2009/3/6 gary liquid liq...@gmail.com:
the bike comes with a subscription to a community repair shop and new
elements are being created for it every day.
it includes out of the box an expansive toolkit able to mend and repair
anything on your bike.
A new water bottle was designed for the bike
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM, gary liquid liq...@gmail.com wrote:
the bike comes with a subscription to a community repair shop and new
elements are being created for it every day.
Provided you *want* all kinds of addons you will never need...
it includes out of the box an expansive toolkit
2009/3/6 Ognen Duzlevski og...@naniteworld.com:
Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Matt Emson mem...@interalpha.co.uk wrote:
I'm trying to stay out of this discussion, because it is a circular
argument - no one will win because there is no simple correct stance.
And now
gary liquid wrote:
the bike comes with a subscription to a community repair shop and new
elements are being created for it every day.
it includes out of the box an expansive toolkit able to mend and
repair anything on your bike.
A new water bottle was designed for the bike which actually
2009/3/6 Mark wolfm...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM, gary liquid liq...@gmail.com wrote:
the bike comes with a subscription to a community repair shop and new
elements are being created for it every day.
Provided you *want* all kinds of addons you will never need...
Provided
Hi,
ext Mark wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM, gary liquid liq...@gmail.com wrote:
the bike comes with a subscription to a community repair shop and new
elements are being created for it every day.
Provided you *want* all kinds of addons you will never need...
it includes out of the
Andrew Flegg wrote:
Agreed, and fully understandable. Can we draw up a list of what -
exactly - the N8x0 fails to do out-of-the-box which it is advertised
it *can* do; and requires hacker-like skills to enable?
One thing that deceived me is that Skype was announced as and important
I won't quote the whole thread, there was too much of a tail already.
Mark seems to have many, many issues, some of them even connected
to the tablet. Since he completly dismissed the corporate usage by
misquoting the original post, I'll address that first. People using Nokia
N8x0 tablets
Hi,
ext Alejandro López wrote:
Agreed, and fully understandable. Can we draw up a list of what -
exactly - the N8x0 fails to do out-of-the-box which it is advertised
it *can* do; and requires hacker-like skills to enable?
One thing that deceived me is that Skype was announced as and
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Eero Tamminen eero.tammi...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi,
ext Mark wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM, gary liquid liq...@gmail.com wrote:
the bike comes with a subscription to a community repair shop and new
elements are being created for it every day.
Provided
Andrew Flegg wrote:
Agreed, and fully understandable. Can we draw up a list of what -
exactly - the N8x0 fails to do out-of-the-box which it is advertised
it *can* do; and requires hacker-like skills to enable?
If I'd never owned another device (Palm, Handspring, Apple Newton, Sharp
Zaurus
Julius Szelagiewicz wrote:
The biggest beef seems to be that the Nokia tablets are not aimed
at the idiots. As a business decision, it may be misguided, since idiots
constitute a vast majority of the buying public. Personally I like to be
treated as an adult.
Julius,
My intended
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Eero Tamminen eero.tammi...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi,
ext Alejandro López wrote:
Agreed, and fully understandable. Can we draw up a list of what -
exactly - the N8x0 fails to do out-of-the-box which it is advertised
it *can* do; and requires hacker-like skills to
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Matt Emson mem...@interalpha.co.uk wrote:
Andrew Flegg wrote:
Agreed, and fully understandable. Can we draw up a list of what -
exactly - the N8x0 fails to do out-of-the-box which it is advertised
it *can* do; and requires hacker-like skills to enable?
[snip
On Mar 6, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Julius Szelagiewicz wrote:
I'm not crazy about out of the box experience and it annoys me to
see on N8x0 the same counter productive underhanded tactics used my
MS -
the teaser apps you have to pay for later.
Do you mind me asking which teaser apps? There's
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
For all their flaws, I'm not aware of Nokia saying you could do something
which you actually
couldn't
The fundamental problem is that you are *deliberately* unaware because
you refuse to accept reality. Like G.W. Bush and a
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
For all their flaws, I'm not aware of Nokia saying you could do something
which you actually couldn't
The fundamental problem is that you are *deliberately*
My complaints notwithstanding, I use my N800 constantly.
* I'm only halfway through my gpe contacts list correcting the import
errors, but I'm already relying heavily on it for that.
* I finally shoved my reservations aside and have started using Google
Calendar to do my time planning. That has
Andrew Flegg wrote:
Right, so although your complaints may be valid (I'm not saying
they're not - honestly, I'd love my tablet to be faster, which is why
I'm looking forward to an RX-51/71), they're not relevant to any
discussion about Nokia mis-selling the tablets or promising they can
do
I am a very savy computer user. Started in Dos 3.3, wrote programs in
Basic on and apple 2, worked my way thru windows and now have a job
supporting Mac laptops for a school... so a fair amount of bike
experience. My geek desk has various desktops ranging from Windows
2000 - Vista, a
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
I'm trying to turn a flaming trollfest into something more
constructive. Instead of calling me names, can you actually respond to
my question: what has Nokia advertised that you can do on the device,
that you can only do by
Ognen Duzlevski a écrit :
Hello,
I am curious to find out what people use their Nokias for. If anyone
could share their usage patterns, it would be appreciated.
Hello,
I own a N770. a N800 and a N810. I use a Nokia 6600 Slide for call, SMS,
photo, agenda and modem. I hope that the next
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:54 PM, OgnenD og...@naniteworld.com wrote:
Not even going to comment. I think you need to re-read your email and reflect
on your communication skills. Pretty uncivilized, in my opinion.
Thanks,
Ognen
Ognen,
OK I apologize. I didn´t know you had a CS degree and
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz j...@eclis.ch wrote:
The concept is good, the hardware too. I think that the most opportunity
to progress is in the usability of the applications. Too much small bugs
or frustrating interface prevent to make the current tablet enjoyable
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
