On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Frank Griffin wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 06:40 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
>>
>> Do you have gnome-control-center installed
>
> I have the same situation, and gnome-control-center is installed.
>
> I think it's time for you to actually test the reproducible cases we've
>
Hi,
sorry the update of gnome keyring broke the BS.
I am fixing it .
hi,
I've updated and imported dokuwiki
(https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096). Can someone review it
before push, please?
thanks in advance.
--
Sandro Cazzaniga - https://lederniercoupdarchet.wordpress.com
IRC: Kharec (irc.freenode.net)
Software/Hardware geek
Conceptor
Magnum's Coordinat
hello
the last BS breakage makes me thing that we should adjust our
packaging policy and add only one lib per lib package.
On our last BS breakage we had as error :
A requested package cannot be installed:
seahorse-2.32.0-2.mga1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied libgp11.so.0()(64bit))
because libgp
'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 15/06/11 09:26 did gyre and gimble:
> hello
>
> the last BS breakage makes me thing that we should adjust our
> packaging policy and add only one lib per lib package.
>
>
> On our last BS breakage we had as error :
>
>
> A requested package cannot be install
2011/6/15 Dexter Morgan :
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Wolfgang Bornath
> wrote:
>> 2011/6/15 Frank Griffin :
>>> On 06/14/2011 06:40 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
Do you have gnome-control-center installed
>>>
>>> I have the same situation, and gnome-control-center is installed.
>>
>>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 15/06/11 09:26 did gyre and gimble:
>> hello
>>
>> the last BS breakage makes me thing that we should adjust our
>> packaging policy and add only one lib per lib package.
>>
>>
>> On our last BS breakage w
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Wolfgang Bornath
wrote:
> 2011/6/15 Dexter Morgan :
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Wolfgang Bornath
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/6/15 Frank Griffin :
On 06/14/2011 06:40 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
>
> Do you have gnome-control-center installed
I h
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Dexter Morgan wrote:
the last BS breakage makes me thing that we should adjust our
packaging policy and add only one lib per lib package.
On our last BS breakage we had as error :
A requested package cannot be installed:
seahorse-2.32.0-2.mga1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied
2011/6/15 Dexter Morgan :
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Wolfgang Bornath
> wrote:
>> 2011/6/15 Dexter Morgan :
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Wolfgang Bornath
>>> wrote:
2011/6/15 Frank Griffin :
> On 06/14/2011 06:40 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
>>
>> Do you have gnome-c
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry the update of gnome keyring broke the BS.
>
> I am fixing it .
>
The BS is now fixed .
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Wolfgang Bornath
wrote:
> 2011/6/15 Dexter Morgan :
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Wolfgang Bornath
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/6/15 Dexter Morgan :
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Wolfgang Bornath
wrote:
> 2011/6/15 Frank Griffin :
>> On 06/14/2
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
BTW: I get the same errors when starting Gnome (2.x) on the same system.
How do you start it? There's no gnome 2.x session listed in gdm, both
'GNOME' and GNOME3' are gnome 3 sessions (without any difference AFAIK). I
was thinking of making the cu
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Christiaan Welvaart
wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
>> BTW: I get the same errors when starting Gnome (2.x) on the same system.
>
> How do you start it? There's no gnome 2.x session listed in gdm, both
> 'GNOME' and GNOME3' are gnome 3 sess
2011/6/15 Dexter Morgan :
>
> can you try to install :
>
> networkmanager
> adwaita-gtk3-theme
> adwaita-cursor-theme
>
> and to restart gnome 3 ?
Installed the packages including dependencies, rebooted, logged in for
Gnome3 - same result!
The warning about networkmanager is gone but some others c
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 01:22:54PM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Installed the packages including dependencies, rebooted, logged in for
> Gnome3 - same result!
Could you also run:
gnome-shell --replace > ~/tmp/gnome-shell-log 2>&1
>From e.g. XFCE? This as I wonder what error messages gnome-s
Le 15/06/2011 10:17, Cazzaniga Sandro a écrit :
> hi,
>
> I've updated and imported dokuwiki
> (https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096). Can someone review it
> before push, please?
>
> thanks in advance.
Any answers. I push it.
--
Sandro Cazzaniga - https://lederniercoupdarchet.wordpress
On 06/12/2011 08:25 AM, Angelo Naselli wrote:
In data mercoledì 8 giugno 2011 23:53:51, Ahmad Samir ha scritto:
Right, I probably phrased that one wrongly; I meant:
fixes a serious bug, e.g. crashing, segfaulting
I don't think we should exclude non-serious bugs :)
Depends, overworking the sec
2011/6/15 Olav Vitters :
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 01:22:54PM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>> Installed the packages including dependencies, rebooted, logged in for
>> Gnome3 - same result!
>
> Could you also run:
> gnome-shell --replace > ~/tmp/gnome-shell-log 2>&1
>
> >From e.g. XFCE? This as
Le mercredi 15 juin 2011 à 07:55 -0400, Stew Benedict a écrit :
> On 06/12/2011 08:25 AM, Angelo Naselli wrote:
> > In data mercoledì 8 giugno 2011 23:53:51, Ahmad Samir ha scritto:
> Right, I probably phrased that one wrongly; I meant:
> fixes a serious bug, e.g. crashing, segfaulting
>
by dave
» Jun 14th, '11, 22:32
One release every year with the related updated
(don't wait one year for have ad updated software) is better. The
best could be an half-rolling like chakra but this option isn't in
the proposals
Michael Scherer skrev 15.6.2011 15:10:
Le mercredi 15 juin 2011 à 07:55 -0400, Stew Benedict a écrit :
On 06/12/2011 08:25 AM, Angelo Naselli wrote:
In data mercoledì 8 giugno 2011 23:53:51, Ahmad Samir ha scritto:
Right, I probably phrased that one wrongly; I meant:
fixes a serious bug, e.g.
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:12:24 +0200 (CEST), Mageia Team
wrote:
> Name: networkmanager Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version : 0.8.9997 Vendor: Mageia.Org
> Release : 0.1.1.mga2Build Date: Tue Jun 14 20:07:17
> 2011
> I
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Mageia Team
wrote:
> Name : networkmanager Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version : 0.8.9997 Vendor: Mageia.Org
> Release : 0.1.1.mga2 Build Date: Tue Jun 14 20:07:17
> 2011
> Install Date:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>
> BTW, should we have a read-only security/update-announce ml that where we
> mail about all updates ?
>
yes seems a must have to push updates descriptions , distributions affected, ...
2011/6/15 JA Magallón :
[...]
>
> This is missing the 'ifcfg-mdv' and 'keyfile' plugins...
>
in fact only the ifcfg-mdv plugin is really missing.
keyfile should be available.
--
Balcaen John
On 06/15/2011 08:50 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Backlund wrote:
BTW, should we have a read-only security/update-announce ml that where we
mail about all updates ?
yes seems a must have to push updates descriptions , distributions affected, ...
That is ac
On 15 June 2011 12:07, Mageia Team wrote:
> dmorgan 1:2-0.1.mga2:
> + Revision: 106759
> - Add some more requires for gnome3
> - Remove buildroot
> Remove old obsoletes
Shouldn't we have task-gnome3?
Or do we plan to just have gnome3 in Mga2?
See you
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
On 15 June 2011 12:07, Mageia Team wrote:
dmorgan 1:2-0.1.mga2:
+ Revision: 106759
- Add some more requires for gnome3
- Remove buildroot
Remove old obsoletes
Shouldn't we have task-gnome3?
Or do we plan to just have gnome3 in Mga2?
If someone
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:46:33PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Proposal 1:
> 6 months release cycle -> 12 months life cycle
> Proposal 2:
> 9 months release cycle -> 18 months life cycle
> Proposal 3:
> 12 months release cycle -> 24 months life cycle
Regarding release cycles from a GNO
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Thierry Vignaud
wrote:
> On 15 June 2011 12:07, Mageia Team wrote:
>> dmorgan 1:2-0.1.mga2:
>> + Revision: 106759
>> - Add some more requires for gnome3
>> - Remove buildroot
>> Remove old obsoletes
>
> Shouldn't we have task-gnome3?
> Or do we plan to just have
As usual at 19h UTC on #mageia-dev. Here are the topics
- post-mortem review
- quick summary of current cycle release discussion
- start of stable updates
- mentoring review
Cheers !
--
Anne
http://www.mageia.org
On 15 June 2011 16:29, Dexter Morgan wrote:
>> Shouldn't we have task-gnome3?
>> Or do we plan to just have gnome3 in Mga2?
>
> in fact i named it task-gnome because this is supposed to be '"main
> gnome"
That's fine
> but i see no pb to rename it to task-gnom3 , just that i think
> it will add
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Thierry Vignaud
wrote:
> On 15 June 2011 16:29, Dexter Morgan wrote:
>>> Shouldn't we have task-gnome3?
>>> Or do we plan to just have gnome3 in Mga2?
>>
>> in fact i named it task-gnome because this is supposed to be '"main
>> gnome"
>
> That's fine
>
>> but i se
Hello,
I'm very interresting by this project.
Currently i'm a member of the french i18n team ( transator ) and i
never make those strange things you call "package".
( but maybe i can learn how to do it )
I will be happy to help you ( if i can )
see you,
mammig
Hello,
nspluginwrapper has been updated to 1.3.x and now to 1.4.x, i.e. it
has a new upstream maintainer http://nspluginwrapper.davidben.net
For the first time in probably 2-3years, the 32bit Adobe Flash player
seemed to work for me in a 64bit browser (I tested firefox and
konqueror).
So give it
On 15 June 2011 10:44, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Dexter Morgan wrote:
>
>> the last BS breakage makes me thing that we should adjust our
>> packaging policy and add only one lib per lib package.
>>
>>
>> On our last BS breakage we had as error :
>>
>>
>> A requested package
mercoledì 15 giugno 2011 alle 17:00, Anne nicolas ha scritto:
> As usual at 19h UTC on #mageia-dev. Here are the topics
>
> - post-mortem review
> - quick summary of current cycle release discussion
> - start of stable updates
> - mentoring review
>
> Cheers !
I cannot attend tonight sorry, i wil
mercoledì 15 giugno 2011 alle 17:43, mammig_linux mammig_linux ha scritto:
> Hello,
Hello and welcome!
> I'm very interresting by this project.
> Currently i'm a member of the french i18n team ( transator ) and i
> never make those strange things you call "package".
> ( but maybe i can learn how t
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2011, 10:44:23 schrieb JA Magallón:
> if I select "System settings" o launch firefox, immediately I get a
> fullscreen error about "something went wrong, plz logout and in again"
Same for me two days back. Since yesterday it works relatively well. I get the
mentioned error
On 15.06.2011 19:15, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 15 June 2011 10:44, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Dexter Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> the last BS breakage makes me thing that we should adjust our
>>> packaging policy and add only one lib per lib package.
>>>
>>>
>>> On our last BS breaka
Hello
I can begin the list of the edubuntu packages and check those who
already are in Megeia ( with the project name/url/type/packager when
it's possible ).
When the wiki page will be open, we will only have to paste it.
see you
mammig
2011/6/15 Angelo Naselli :
> mercoledì 15 giugno 2011 alle
mercoledì 15 giugno 2011 alle 19:10, mammig_linux mammig_linux ha scritto:
> packager
Well packager should mean who of us take care about :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:10 PM, mammig_linux mammig_linux
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I can begin the list of the edubuntu packages and check those who
> already are in Megeia ( with the project name/url/type/packager when
> it's possible ).
> When the wiki page will be open, we will only have to paste it
Le mercredi 15 juin 2011 20:27:52, Dexter Morgan a écrit :
> > I can begin the list of the edubuntu packages and check those who
> > already are in Megeia ( with the project name/url/type/packager when
> > it's possible ).
A task-education rpm would be simple to use.
On 14 June 2011 17:54, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> > do we wait firefox 5 rc or we can start to update to firefox 5 soon ?
>>
>> Mandriva now has several packages for firefox (like for chromium), following
>> the upstream channels, maybe we could envision doing it too ?
>
> As a user, I will download
On 14 June 2011 17:54, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:14:02 +0200
> Samuel Verschelde
> wrote:
>>
>> Le mardi 14 juin 2011 13:56:29, Dexter Morgan a écrit :
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > do we wait firefox 5 rc or we can start to update to firefox 5 soon ?
>>
>> Mandriva now has several p
On 06/15/2011 09:22 AM, Stew Benedict wrote:
On 06/15/2011 08:50 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Backlund wrote:
BTW, should we have a read-only security/update-announce ml that
where we
mail about all updates ?
yes seems a must have to push updates descripti
On 14 June 2011 14:32, Frank Griffin wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 08:22 AM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>>
>> Upgrading stable firefox to firefox5rc and importing firefox-{beta,aurora}
>> are two distinct orthogonal things IMHO.
>>
>> since firefox5 is near being released, I think we should update
>> main xu
On 15 June 2011 13:35, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 14 June 2011 14:32, Frank Griffin wrote:
>> On 06/14/2011 08:22 AM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>>>
>>> Upgrading stable firefox to firefox5rc and importing firefox-{beta,aurora}
>>> are two distinct orthogonal things IMHO.
>>>
>>> since firefox5 is near
'Twas brillig, and Anssi Hannula at 15/06/11 18:06 did gyre and gimble:
> On 15.06.2011 19:15, Ahmad Samir wrote:
>> For example look at Amarok:
>> $ urpmf --sourcerpm :amarok | sort | grep lib
>> lib64amarokcore1:amarok-2.4.1-0.mga1.src.rpm
>> lib64amaroklib1:amarok-2.4.1-0.mga1.src.rpm
>> lib64am
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU a écrit :
Release frequency never was a criteria for differentiating between
pushing something to updates and something to backports.
It should be. Otherwise, we should all be using OpenOffice.org 1.0.1. --
security issues set aside.
And I see no reason why it would be
Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le mardi 14 juin 2011 20:00:39, Anne nicolas a écrit :
2011/6/14 Wolfgang Bornath
2011/6/14 Anne nicolas:
I guess because of Mandriva policy. We did provide backports but it was
explicitely said to be unsupported. "Use it at your own risks"
We may have to rewrite
Le mercredi 15 juin 2011 17:32:35, Stew Benedict a écrit :
[...]
>
> Bugs:
>
> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678 (vde2)
> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1554 (mysql)
> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1813 (curl)
> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1521 (subversio
>From: andre999
>
[...]
>
>In my mind you make an excellent case for upgrading this application from
>upstream, and installing
>under /opt, as you say you do already.
>Which I do for Mozilla Seamonkey, for example, because of relatively frequent
>updates. (In that
>case I also apply some pers
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:22:18 +0200 (CEST), Mageia Team
wrote:
> Name: gthumb Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version : 2.12.3Vendor: Mageia.Org
> Release : 1.mga2Build Date: Thu Jun 16 00:17:17
> 2011
> I
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:32:23 +0200 (CEST), Mageia Team
wrote:
> Name: rhythmboxRelocations: (not relocatable)
> Version : 0.13.3Vendor: Mageia.Org
> Release : 7.mga2Build Date: Tue Jun 14 18:24:25
> 2011
> I
2011/6/15 Thorsten van Lil :
> Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2011, 10:44:23 schrieb JA Magallón:
>> if I select "System settings" o launch firefox, immediately I get a
>> fullscreen error about "something went wrong, plz logout and in again"
>
> Same for me two days back. Since yesterday it works relative
2011/6/16 JA Magallón :
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:22:18 +0200 (CEST), Mageia Team
> wrote:
>
>> Name : gthumb Relocations: (not relocatable)
>> Version : 2.12.3 Vendor: Mageia.Org
>> Release : 1.mga2 Build Date:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:31:44 +0300
Ahmad Samir wrote:
> > Why the '3' digit in libraries ? We can not have this in parallel
> > with old one...
>
> Ask upstream, we don't add suffix libs with '3' manually, IINM.
Probably because is for/requires gtk+3 and latest stable brasero-2.32.1
is for gt
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 02:47:16 schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
> Btw: after latest updates I don't have the nice blue background in
> Gnome, it is somehow distorted (blue but with lighter blue stripes,
You mean like this?
http://galleries.stefan-horning.de/d/7704-2/GNOME3-Info-o.png
Greetings,
2011/6/16 Thorsten van Lil :
> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 02:47:16 schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
>> Btw: after latest updates I don't have the nice blue background in
>> Gnome, it is somehow distorted (blue but with lighter blue stripes,
>
> You mean like this?
> http://galleries.stefan-horning.de/d
62 matches
Mail list logo
