Re: [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion - messages from the forum

2011-06-19 Thread lebarhon
Le 18/06/2011 13:19, Michael Scherer a écrit : Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 12:12 +0200, lebarhon a écrit : 1) can you please avoid posting as html to the list ? 2) if you wish to serve as a human gateway really between forum and ml ( which I didn't ask, I am smart enough to read forum by myself, a

Re: [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion - messages from the forum

2011-06-19 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
2011/6/19 lebarhon : > Le 18/06/2011 13:19, Michael Scherer a écrit : >> >> Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 12:12 +0200, lebarhon a écrit : >> >> 1) can you please avoid posting as html to the list ? >> >> 2) if you wish to serve as a human gateway really between forum and ml >> ( which I didn't ask, I am

Re: [Mageia-dev] "Job offer" : mentoring program coordinator

2011-06-19 Thread Daniel Kreuter
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 3:44 AM, andre999 wrote: > Daniel Kreuter a écrit : > >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Samuel Verschelde > > wrote: >> >>Le dimanche 12 juin 2011 15:27:59, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : >> > ... > > The 2 candidates were good, which comp

Re: [Mageia-dev] "Job offer" : mentoring program coordinator

2011-06-19 Thread magnus
2011/6/19 Daniel Kreuter > One suggestion would be to have a page on wiki where newcomers can put > their name on if they seek for a mentor. > I think a good way to start. Perhaps we can help, especially if a newcomer ask a mailing list. Ask her/him for his skills and preferences and give her/him

Re: [Mageia-dev] "Job offer" : mentoring program coordinator

2011-06-19 Thread andre999
Daniel Kreuter a écrit : Thanks for the offer André. One suggestion would be to have a page on wiki where newcomers can put their name on if they seek for a mentor. But this can wait until the new wiki is online i think. As for now i only found a page where we can see our mentors and their appre

Re: [Mageia-dev] "Job offer" : mentoring program coordinator

2011-06-19 Thread andre999
magnus a écrit : 2011/6/19 Daniel Kreuter mailto:daniel.kreute...@googlemail.com>> One suggestion would be to have a page on wiki where newcomers can put their name on if they seek for a mentor. I think a good way to start. Perhaps we can help, especially if a newcomer ask a mailing l

Re: [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion

2011-06-19 Thread andre999
andre999 a écrit : Michael Scherer a écrit : Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 03:38 -0400, andre999 a écrit : Michael Scherer a écrit : Proposal 1: 6 months release cycle -> 12 months life cycle ( Fedora, Ubuntu, Mandriva< 2010.1&& Mandriva != 2006.0 ) Proposal 2: 9 months release cycle -> 18 month

Re: [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion

2011-06-19 Thread Oliver Burger
andre999 schrieb am 19.06.2011 > Another thought about the amended freeze process. > Have you noticed how packagers sometimes set off an exchange of 10 > or more emails in attempts to get a package into the release > during the freeze ? > The packager wants to submit, but they can't because cauldr

Re: [Mageia-dev] Finalizing update process

2011-06-19 Thread Michael Scherer
Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 23:25 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit : > On 15 June 2011 22:32, Stew Benedict wrote: > qa-bugs@ can't be be set as the assignee in bug reports, it should be > made possible. Yes, that requires to create a account for that. Dmorgan knows, I don't :/ ( and we should document t

Re: [Mageia-dev] Finalizing update process

2011-06-19 Thread nicolas vigier
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Ahmad Samir wrote: > > qa-bugs@ can't be be set as the assignee in bug reports, it should be > made possible. It should be possible now (since friday actually). This bug for instance is assigned to qa-bugs@ : https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1554

Re: [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion

2011-06-19 Thread mammig_linux mammig_linux
Hello, The discussion about the "Mageia life cycle" start few days ago on the forum of the French user community of Mageia ( http://www.mageialinux-online.org/forum/topic-10576+cycle-de-vie-de-mageia.php : for those who read French ) tTo put all the answers in a nutshell, i will say that users ra

Re: [Mageia-dev] Missing packages in Mageia 1. How to backport? (was: Finalizing update process)

2011-06-19 Thread Michael Scherer
Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 23:29 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit : > So, is there a consensus about this yet? (note that the backports list > of packages keeps growing in the mean time :)). Well, my own impression was that the consensus is : the policy for version 1 is : - we can upload a missing package

[Mageia-dev] perl 5.14.1 on its way

2011-06-19 Thread Jerome Quelin
hi, i just submitted perl 5.14.1, which should be a smooth upgrade. no need to recompile binary modules this time. jérôme

Re: [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion

2011-06-19 Thread Michael Scherer
Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 23:49 -0400, andre999 a écrit : > Michael Scherer a écrit : > > > > Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 03:38 -0400, andre999 a écrit : > >> Michael Scherer a écrit : > > If people work the same amount of time, with work divided on 2 products, > > they must share their time, and usua

Re: [Mageia-dev] perl 5.14.1 on its way

2011-06-19 Thread Funda Wang
What do you think of a fedora-like perl FSH layout? 2011/6/19 Jerome Quelin : > hi, > > i just submitted perl 5.14.1, which should be a smooth upgrade. no need > to recompile binary modules this time. > > jérôme >

Re: [Mageia-dev] perl 5.14.1 on its way

2011-06-19 Thread Anssi Hannula
On 19.06.2011 19:18, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le dimanche 19 juin 2011 à 15:46 +0200, Jerome Quelin a écrit : >> hi, >> >> i just submitted perl 5.14.1, which should be a smooth upgrade. no need >> to recompile binary modules this time. > > Some packages seems to have some errors : > http://check.

Re: [Mageia-dev] perl 5.14.1 on its way

2011-06-19 Thread Michael Scherer
Le dimanche 19 juin 2011 à 15:46 +0200, Jerome Quelin a écrit : > hi, > > i just submitted perl 5.14.1, which should be a smooth upgrade. no need > to recompile binary modules this time. Some packages seems to have some errors : http://check.mageia.org/dependencies.html "perl found with incorrec

Re: [Mageia-dev] perl 5.14.1 on its way

2011-06-19 Thread Jerome Quelin
On 11/06/19 18:18 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le dimanche 19 juin 2011 à 15:46 +0200, Jerome Quelin a écrit : > > i just submitted perl 5.14.1, which should be a smooth upgrade. no need > > to recompile binary modules this time. > > Some packages seems to have some errors : > http://check.mage

Re: [Mageia-dev] perl 5.14.1 on its way

2011-06-19 Thread Jerome Quelin
On 11/06/19 22:41 +0800, Funda Wang wrote: > What do you think of a fedora-like perl FSH layout? can you elaborate please? i'm not aware of their layout. what is the layout, what needs to be done, what about the existing packages, etc. jérôme

Re: [Mageia-dev] perl 5.14.1 on its way

2011-06-19 Thread Jerome Quelin
On 11/06/19 18:18 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > "perl found with incorrect range == 2:5.14.1-1.mga2 (needed == > 2:5.14.0)" > > Is this a youri error or a real issue ? how can we find those? afaik, "urpmf --requires :perl" cannot be used with a specific version. any help to find those packages

[Mageia-dev] python-twisted

2011-06-19 Thread Cazzaniga Sandro
Hi, Just for info, python-twisted 11.0.0 is now in cauldron. You can test it and file bugs reports if it's needed. Cheers -- Sandro Cazzaniga - https://lederniercoupdarchet.wordpress.com IRC: Kharec (irc.freenode.net) Software/Hardware geek Conceptor Magnum's Coordinator/editor (http://magnum.tu

Re: [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion - messages from the forum

2011-06-19 Thread lebarhon
Le 19/06/2011 10:28, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit : Nobody said anything against your efforts although I don't see any reason there (and I haven't seen any discussion in the webteam where it was decided to do so), Who the hell are you to dare say I am a liar ! https://forums.mageia.org/en/viewtopic

Re: [Mageia-dev] perl 5.14.1 on its way

2011-06-19 Thread Anssi Hannula
On 19.06.2011 21:02, Jerome Quelin wrote: > On 11/06/19 18:18 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: >> "perl found with incorrect range == 2:5.14.1-1.mga2 (needed == >> 2:5.14.0)" >> >> Is this a youri error or a real issue ? > > how can we find those? afaik, "urpmf --requires :perl" cannot be used > with

Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release p-uae-2.3.2-1.gita2b6937.2.mga2

2011-06-19 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 18 June 2011 20:12, Mageia Team wrote: > [This is in an unofficial branch of UAE (the Ubiquitous Amiga Emulator) > with the aim of bringing the features of WinUAE to non-Windows platforms > such as Linux, Mac OS X and BeOS.] > > obgr_seneca 2.3.2-1.gita2b6937.2.mga2: > + Revision: 109474 > - c

Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release p-uae-2.3.2-1.gita2b6937.2.mga2

2011-06-19 Thread Oliver Burger
Thierry Vignaud schrieb am 19.06.2011 > On 18 June 2011 20:12, Mageia Team wrote: > > [This is in an unofficial branch of UAE (the Ubiquitous Amiga > > Emulator) with the aim of bringing the features of WinUAE to > > non-Windows platforms such as Linux, Mac OS X and BeOS.] > > > > obgr_seneca

Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release drakx-installer-binaries-1.50-3.mga2

2011-06-19 Thread James Kerr
On 19/06/11 18:43, Mageia Team wrote: Name: drakx-installer-binaries Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.50 Vendor: Mageia.Org Release : 3.mga2Build Date: Sun Jun 19 19:40:17 2011 Install Date: (not installed)

Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release networkmanager-0.8.9997-0.1.1.mga2

2011-06-19 Thread JA Magallón
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:02:21 -0300, John Balcaen wrote: > 2011/6/15 JA Magallón : > [...] > > > > This is missing the 'ifcfg-mdv' and 'keyfile' plugins... > > > in fact only the ifcfg-mdv plugin is really missing. > keyfile should be available. > The plugin file is not there. only ifcfg-rh: on

Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release networkmanager-0.8.9997-0.1.1.mga2

2011-06-19 Thread JA Magallón
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:18:50 +0200, JA Magallón wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:02:21 -0300, John Balcaen wrote: > > > 2011/6/15 JA Magallón : > > [...] > > > > > > This is missing the 'ifcfg-mdv' and 'keyfile' plugins... > > > > > in fact only the ifcfg-mdv plugin is really missing. > > keyfil

Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release p-uae-2.3.2-1.gita2b6937.2.mga2

2011-06-19 Thread Michael Scherer
Le dimanche 19 juin 2011 à 22:40 +0200, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : > On 18 June 2011 20:12, Mageia Team wrote: > > [This is in an unofficial branch of UAE (the Ubiquitous Amiga Emulator) > > with the aim of bringing the features of WinUAE to non-Windows platforms > > such as Linux, Mac OS X and BeO

Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release networkmanager-0.8.9997-0.1.1.mga2

2011-06-19 Thread Balcaen John
Le dimanche 19 juin 2011 19:18:50, JA Magallón a écrit : > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:02:21 -0300, John Balcaen wrote: > > > 2011/6/15 JA Magallón : > > [...] > > > > > > This is missing the 'ifcfg-mdv' and 'keyfile' plugins... > > > > > in fact only the ifcfg-mdv plugin is really missing. > > keyfil

Re: [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion

2011-06-19 Thread andre999
Michael Scherer a écrit : Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 23:49 -0400, andre999 a écrit : Michael Scherer a écrit : Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 03:38 -0400, andre999 a écrit : Michael Scherer a écrit : If people work the same amount of time, with work divided on 2 products, they must share their ti

Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release networkmanager-0.8.9997-0.1.1.mga2

2011-06-19 Thread Balcaen John
Le dimanche 19 juin 2011 20:00:20, JA Magallón a écrit : [...] > > So i short it seems that wpa_supplicant has to be compiled with dbus support for > new networkmanager. I also see a patch in src.rpm to disable dbus I'll disable the patch & add 2 more patchs from fedora, could you please test

Re: [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion - messages from the forum

2011-06-19 Thread Remco Rijnders
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 09:33:44PM +0200, lebarhon wrote: Le 19/06/2011 10:28, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit : Nobody said anything against your efforts although I don't see any reason there (and I haven't seen any discussion in the webteam where it was decided to do so), Who the hell are you to dar