2011/7/8 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
There is nothing planned yet. ( we do not even have enough servers to
have a shell for packagers or others :/ )
The problem I see with ppa is they lack basic quality control, they
often interfere with upgrade and when they break, people blame the
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I've had a rather vague idea about standardising the virtual provides
in the distro, there should be:
Provides: %{name}-devel
Provides: lib%{name}-devel
either both of them in _all_ packages, or one of them
This thread has strayed far from the original question, which could be
re-stated as:
Should tainted free software and tainted nonfree software be commingled
in a single tainted repository?
Given Mageia's commitment to the promotion of free software, I believe
that they should not. If Mageia
Le vendredi 8 juillet 2011 06:22:38, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 7 July 2011 22:04, philippe makowski makowski.mag...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/7 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org:
Yes, for the test about the bug fixed. But isn't there tests to check
for regressions ?
when you push a
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:22:38 -0400, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com
wrote:
IMHO, for big packages like libreoffice, we'll have to rely on the
free-cost-daily-usage QA, i.e. pushing it to Cauldron users for
1-2month, and waiting till the dust settles before pushing to older
stable
2011/7/8 James Kerr j...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk:
This thread has strayed far from the original question, which could be
re-stated as:
Should tainted free software and tainted nonfree software be commingled in a
single tainted repository?
How can tainted software be free software at the
Le vendredi 8 juillet 2011 10:20:16, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le vendredi 8 juillet 2011 06:22:38, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 7 July 2011 22:04, philippe makowski makowski.mag...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/7 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org:
Yes, for the test about the bug fixed. But
2011/7/8 Thorsten van Lil tv...@gmx.de:
Am 08.07.2011 10:42, schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
2011/7/8 James Kerrj...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk:
This thread has strayed far from the original question, which could be
re-stated as:
Should tainted free software and tainted nonfree software be
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, andre999 wrote:
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, Damien Lallement wrote:
Le 07/07/2011 14:18, nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, José Jorge wrote:
Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 18:12:44, nicolas vigier a écrit :
Hello,
A few package updates need
Hi folks,
thanks to mamming we've improved our wiki page [1].
It's always work in progress of course, new project entries
and movement from to be packaged to package are
always welcome :D
Let's talk about what to do now, two main steps are:
* add missing educational programs
* group educational
2011/7/8 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org:
I think the goal is not to do full regression tests, as we don't have
time for this. But do minimal testing, in 1 or 2 minutes, to check that
basic functionality is still working, to check that the update didn't
break everything. For LibreOffice
'Twas brillig, and Eugeni Dodonov at 07/07/11 22:38 did gyre and gimble:
But as for QA, yes, this is true. Probably the best solution for it was
Meego's one, in the n800 era - when you install something from
non-official repo it shows a window saying 'You are installing something
that could
Le 08/07/2011 12:28, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
I think also the ppa-purge tool is quite useful (I've not used it
myself, just read instructions of it's use) which can aid the purging
of a given PPA's packages and the installation of the offical packages
needed to solve any dependency holes left
Hi,
As seen on the blog, I will be at Libre Software Meeting and in holidays
for a few days after, do not expect a fast answer from me nor much
answer on irc until 18th July.
I will also not be present in meeting during the week.
--
Michael Scherer
On 08/07/11 06:37, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Hello.
I've had a rather vague idea about standardising the virtual provides
in the distro, there should be:
Provides: %{name}-devel
Provides: lib%{name}-devel
either both of them in _all_ packages, or one of them in _all_
packages, so that we don't have
On 8 July 2011 13:44, EatDirt dirt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/07/11 06:37, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Hello.
I've had a rather vague idea about standardising the virtual provides
in the distro, there should be:
Provides: %{name}-devel
Provides: lib%{name}-devel
either both of them in _all_
On 08.07.2011 07:37, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Hello.
I've had a rather vague idea about standardising the virtual provides
in the distro, there should be:
Provides: %{name}-devel
Provides: lib%{name}-devel
either both of them in _all_ packages, or one of them in _all_
packages, so that we
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Hello.
I've had a rather vague idea about standardising the virtual provides
in the distro, there should be:
Provides: %{name}-devel
Provides: lib%{name}-devel
Good idea.
With version and release included :
Provides: %{name}-devel =
Hi,
Mageia App Db (still under development but already usable and making progress)
has a new page which compares all packages in stable releases to the packages
in the development branch (here, cooker).
You can find it here :
http://88.191.121.20/madb/mageia/index.php/package/comparison/
It
Am 08.07.2011 17:31, schrieb nicolas vigier:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Hello.
I've had a rather vague idea about standardising the virtual provides
in the distro, there should be:
Provides: %{name}-devel
Provides: lib%{name}-devel
Good idea.
With version and release included :
Le vendredi 08 juillet 2011 à 17:27 +0300, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 08.07.2011 07:37, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Hello.
I've had a rather vague idea about standardising the virtual provides
in the distro, there should be:
Provides: %{name}-devel
Provides: lib%{name}-devel
either both
philippe makowski a écrit :
2011/7/8 nicolas vigierbo...@mars-attacks.org:
I think the goal is not to do full regression tests, as we don't have
time for this. But do minimal testing, in 1 or 2 minutes, to check that
basic functionality is still working, to check that the update didn't
break
Angelo Naselli a écrit :
Hi folks,
thanks to mamming we've improved our wiki page [1].
It's always work in progress of course, new project entries
and movement from to be packaged to package are
always welcome :D
Let's talk about what to do now, two main steps are:
* add missing educational
Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
2011/7/8 Thorsten van Liltv...@gmx.de:
Am 08.07.2011 10:42, schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
2011/7/8 James Kerrj...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk:
This thread has strayed far from the original question, which could be
re-stated as:
Should tainted free software and
24 matches
Mail list logo
