Hello,
can someone push waf, please?
it is a new upstream with regression fixes, and I added a change to
%python3_waf macro so packages like python-cairo should not build fail
anymore
thanks
Hi,
is there one of the Python3 packager that can have a look at bug #9395 ?
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9395
it affect mga2 and Cauldron and it is relative to distutils
note that Fedora package is not affected and they also use -Wl,--noundefined
thanks
2013/3/16 Anne Nicolas enna...@gmail.com:
Welcome on board guys! Now I'm taking 2 months vacation :) (joking)
Next packagers meeting will be on 19th of march.
Thanks all
2013/3/11 Anne Nicolas enna...@gmail.com:
Well I don't want guilty people but some help to organize this team :) Last
weeks were quite hard on that side
;)
not that I'm feeling guilty, but if we are 3, I think that now I can
give some time to Mageia for such tasks, if nobody else want to jump.
Hi,
2013/1/6 Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com:
So far only waf should be a problem. Maybe we could add a macro with
only the number of cpus and use -j%n_cpus with waf instead of using
the make flags given that it is not compatible with other make
options? (In smp_mflags the second m is for
2012/12/18 Joseph Wang joequ...@gmail.com:
FYI, I just checked in a python-elements SRPM. I don't have the
ability to kick off a build, so someone else needs to do it to get
python-elements.
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Pending_packages
will try to have a look at this week end if no one else
Hi,
2012/11/26 Shlomi Fish shlo...@shlomifish.org:
can you update python-lxml to 3.0.1 or is there any reason it wasn't updated
yet?
just because http://check.mageia.org did not told me to update it ;)
Otherwise, I can update it (it was a matter of changing the version, and
running mgarepo
2012/10/11 Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie:
'Twas brillig, and philippe makowski at 10/10/12 17:34 did gyre and gimble:
Hi all,
how can we deal with this bug https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6514
?
is my suggestion the good one ?
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6514
2012/6/16 Oliver Burger obgr_sen...@mageia.org:
Ican help on python. But only if others come along. Since we do not have
group maintainership, I could take python officially and we could create an
inofficial group for it.
I'm quiet busy for the next 6 months, but feel free to ring me (by email
2012/3/30 Remco Rijnders re...@webconquest.com:
python-yaml eandry
I'll take this one
Hi,
I see that we have a broken dependency with gnome-python-gtkmozembed
not really a surprise since ther is no maintainer and it have to be
rebuild each time that libxulrunner is updated
Mandriva still have gnome-python-gtkmozembed but I see that Fedora
obsolete it, as gtkhtml2
2012/1/9 Jani Välimaa jani.vali...@gmail.com:
If you need to fix a typo in previous commit, use svn propedit:
svn propedit --revprop -r release svn:log
svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages
thanks
I didn't know that
or I forgot
Hi,
I think I will have more free time now
so if an apprentice is looking for a mentor, you can contact me
Hi,
am I the only one that can't do updates since yesterday ?
I get this message :
erreur: /var/cache/urpmi/partial/autocorr-fr-3.4.4.2-0.3.mga1.noarch.rpm:
not an rpm package
erreur:
/var/cache/urpmi/partial/libreoffice-opensymbol-fonts-3.4.4.2-0.3.mga1.noarch.rpm:
not an rpm package
erreur:
2012/1/6 Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com:
The first package is valid here:
strange
I tried many times after a urpmi --clean with no success
and now, with another mirror, no problem
For Information here the updated Mandriva Python packaging policy
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Python_packaging_policy
I did not read it yet
2011/11/23 Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com:
The problem is, why we are shipping a dead package?
Dead ?
https://bitbucket.org/troorl/pino3/
not sure it is dead
Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 15:34, philippe makowski
makowski.mag...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/23 Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com:
The problem is, why we are shipping a dead package?
Dead ?
https://bitbucket.org/troorl/pino3/
not sure it is dead
2011/10/13 Guillaume Rousse guillomovi...@gmail.com:
Le 13/10/2011 10:08, philippe makowski a écrit :
what do we do with %_post_service and %_preun_service ?
Those macros will have to be enhanced to handle new behaviours, without
having to modify packages.
hum
an how to manage sockets
2011/10/24 Anne nicolas enn...@mageia.org:
http://check.mageia.org/dependencies.html
Some work to be done to clean this
tried to update pino to clean this, but it fail and I don't have the
knowledge to fix it
(I took the Fedora package)
If someone can take care of it :
Le 12 octobre 2011 21:24, Rémi Verschelde r...@verschelde.fr a écrit :
2011/10/12 Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net:
Are there other packagers who would be interested in maintaining python
packages within a group ?
Samuel
I would, when I am a packager.
I'm just starting mentorship,
2011/10/12 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
Would you have tried to install Cauldron, you would know it's enabled
by default.
;)
ok
so let me express this another way :
are we taking the decision to have mandatory move from SysV initscript
to systemd unit file for our packages that
2011/10/13 Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org:
No, it's not mandatory.
(but yes we forced it for now on Cauldron to get more systemd testers)
For Mageia 2 we will support both initscripts and systemd
ok
any howto available ?
where do we put systemd files ?
is %{_unitdir} the correct place ?
what do we do with %_post_service and %_preun_service ?
Those macros will have to be enhanced to handle new behaviours, without
having to modify packages.
???
is there in cauldron a spec that already implemented the move from
initscripts to systemd ?
Not really moved from initscripts,
Hi,
how and when will we make the move ?
should we need to provide native systemd service files for Mageia 2 ?
some doc from Fedora for packaging :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd
2011/8/16 Anne nicolas enn...@mageia.org:
Back online. We are planning our next meeting for 24th of august, 19h
UTC on #mageia-dev.
sorry, I won't be there
have a nice meeting
Hi all,
I will be without Internet from August 20 to September 4
and too busy on other stuff from today to August 20
so roughly don't count me in before September 5
For all python packages,
be aware that with kernel 3.0 python packages can be affected by this bug :
http://bugs.python.org/issue12326
2011/7/16 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
Either 2 rpms with the same source, or 1 rpm that generate 2 sub rpms.
I would rather use 2 separate rpms, as this seems to be easier.
I see, so really treating python2 and python 3 as 2 differents languages
why not, that will increase the number of
2011/7/13 Michael scherer m...@zarb.org:
I would be in favor of treating python2 and python 3 as 2 differents
languages.
The rational is that :
- we cannot garantee to have support for both
- we will likely have some module who would be updated only on
python 3 sooner or later
- we will
Hi,
remember this first draft (http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=python_policy)
that is still a draft
now we have also Python3 so we really need to write our policy
I see mainly two majors points :
1/ pyc, pyo management
2/ having Python2 and Python3
about 1/ :
it seems that the best would be
Hi,
I started to write a mgarepo howto
feel free to contribute ;)
I think also that part of this future howto can be added to man
2011/7/8 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org:
I think the goal is not to do full regression tests, as we don't have
time for this. But do minimal testing, in 1 or 2 minutes, to check that
basic functionality is still working, to check that the update didn't
break everything. For LibreOffice
2011/7/7 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org:
Yes, for the test about the bug fixed. But isn't there tests to check for
regressions ?
when you push a new minor version (only bugfix) for softwares like
LibreOffice, Postgresql or Firebird for example, will the Mageia QA
team run tests for
Hi,
can someone help me to solve the build problem here :
http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/20110628070637.philippem.valstar.17988/
what is strange is that Fedora 16 build is ok with same libboost
version as our in Cauldron
thanks
2011/6/28 Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com:
quote
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_program_options
/quote
That is the problem here, it is looking for libboost_program_options,
but we only have libboost_program_options-mt.
and why ?
under mga1 we have libboost_program_options.so.1.44.0
and
2011/6/28 Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com:
I've committed a fix, hopefully it'll work.
thanks
2011/6/13 Jerome Quelin jque...@gmail.com:
- perl-DBD-Firebird
this module does not compile with perl 5.14: no success reported by any
cpan testers. i've added a conflicts in perl to have a smooth transition
too. it'll be updated when a new version is available upstream.
thanks reporting, I
Seems that buildbot have been not so well packaged
since 8.0 master and slave have separate sources
and we have only master now
if no one object I'll try to take care of this package
I will do a new one for slave and certainly update it to latest version
and build it as noarch
2011/6/7 philippe makowski makowski.mag...@gmail.com:
Seems that buildbot have been not so well packaged
since 0.8.0 master and slave have separate sources
and we have only master now
sorry read to fast
0.8.0 is ok it have both master and slave
slave is a separate package since Release 0.8.1
Please submit python-feedparser, to solve the Upgrade from 2010.2
issue and fix CVE-2009-5065, CVE-2011-1156, CVE-2011-1157,
CVE-2011-1158
2011/4/27 Herbert Poetzl herb...@13thfloor.at:
uploaded the packages in question here, as it seems that
this will take a little longer than expected ...
http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/MAGEIA/
I took a quick look
can you please try to follow this policy :
Hi,
does it make sense to package python-qt ?
I think that python-matplotlib-qt should be removed from python-matplotlib spec
python-qt4 is enough
Please submit firebird-2.5.0.26074.0-1, this a major bug fix :
-Fix rh #697313 with backport mainstream patch CORE-3447 (icu 4.2)
in short without this patch Firebird don't handle correctly icu 4.2
and databases are not created correctly
thanks
Hi,
I packaged schroot, because I find it very useful
(for the Firebird project, all our snapshots builds are done with it,
and with lvm snapshots we have a clean env for running tests)
I took the Fedora package as a starter, but it need some debugging to
be fully integrated to Mageia
so if
hello,
2011/4/17 Zézinho lists.jjo...@free.fr:
I'd like to help the packaging effort of Mageia. I am doing rpm for myself for
a while, and even contributed a few to Mandriva a while ago.
I plan to start with a cleanup to mageia of some mandriva srpms I miss :
- cultivation
Hi,
I was working on new upstream fo deja-dup, but i require libnotify = 0.7
and we have 0.5.2
is it possible to update it to without trouble ?
2011/4/6 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
I would be in favor of dropping task-lamp-python ( and perl too ),
I agree
and same for python-xfce
2011/3/30 philippe makowski makowski.mag...@gmail.com:
I looked around about pyc/pyo policy
Fedora : the byte compiled files need to be compiled and included in
the %files section
OpenSuse : same as Fedora, but they have a %fdupes macro, because
Most of the time, .pyo files are exactly
Hi,
I looked around about pyc/pyo policy
Fedora : the byte compiled files need to be compiled and included in
the %files section
OpenSuse : same as Fedora, but they have a %fdupes macro, because
Most of the time, .pyo files are exactly the same as .pyc
Debian : no pyc/pyo shipped
they have two
2011/3/14 Olivier Blin mag...@blino.org:
Please post the full logs so that we get more details.
coming back on this, I can use iurt if I do :
iurt --repository
http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/Mageia/distrib/ --rebuild
cauldron x86_64 ./SRPMS/abiword-2.8.6-1.mga1.src.rpm
Well,
it was assumed you alredy know what's needed to build rpms...
urpmi rpm-build
you are kidding ?
of course I have rpm-build
it is iurt that don't install itself rpm-build
2011/3/13 Olivier Blin mag...@blino.org:
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org writes:
yeah, so i'm gonna see how far it get with iurt...
Having a working out of the box package of iurt would be a killer
feature. Fedora does offer mock for that, and that's quite handy.
It already works pretty well
2011/3/14 Olivier Blin mag...@blino.org:
Please post the full logs so that we get more details.
here they are :
http://www.espelida.com/files/initialize-1.0.20110313181207.log
and
http://www.espelida.com/files/initialize-1.0.20110313191448.log
2011/3/11 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
Having a working out of the box package of iurt would be a killer
feature. Fedora does offer mock for that, and that's quite handy.
+1
2011/3/10 Anne nicolas enna...@gmail.com:
Hi there
I've tried to formalize a list of missing packages:
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=missing_packages
pysol is dead upstream , the new one is pysolFC
if need I can take care of it
and for postgresql8.4 is it really need since we have 9.0 ?
About Firebird
if I follow the link you provided in the Fedora wiki,
I then need to put :
Interbase and Interbase-like
or can we add to the list IDPL (http://firebirdsql.org/index.php?op=docid=idpl)
and so I can put Interbase and IDPL
because in fact Firebird is now mainly under IDPL
story :
2011/3/4 Anne nicolas enna...@gmail.com:
Please have a look an check what could be missing as important
packages and we will see how we can deal with it
may I suggest a backup tool ?
Déjà Dup ?
Hi,
about the build system, with Mandriva we had ssh access to build boxes
under Fedora I can use fedpkg to either make a local build into a
clean chroot or to ask for a scratch-build on the build system from a
local srpm
(scratch-build from a local srpm is really nice when testing a new package)
2011/2/11 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
For now, we plan to open the mirror soon now the first
part is complete, so people could at least install their own chroot/test
compute whatever.
good news
2011/2/11 Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com:
Building from a local src.rpm can probably be done
Hi,
I really prefer the Fedora spec
(http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=python-reportlab.git;a=summary)
than the Mandriva one
(http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/python-reportlab/current/)
can I upload directly a new rpm made like in Fedora instead of the
Mandriva one
2011/2/3 philippe makowski makowski.mag...@gmail.com:
2011/2/3 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
The only thing left are :
* apache ( and apache-mod_fastcgi, apache-mod_perl, apache-mod_php,
apache-mod_ssl, apache-mod_wsgi
* bugzilla
* icecream
* rails
* sympa
* mercurial
So any taker
2011/2/4 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
ie ?
You can do a svn propedit svn:log if there is something to change
yes ;)
I'll do
I posted the email as a reminder, because I really have to switch to other tasks
2011/2/3 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
The only thing left are :
* apache ( and apache-mod_fastcgi, apache-mod_perl, apache-mod_php,
apache-mod_ssl, apache-mod_wsgi
* bugzilla
* icecream
* rails
* sympa
* mercurial
So any taker ?
seeing the Mandriva spec, I take mercurial
Hi all,
if any one have a clue to solve my build problem
the build is ok on my mdv with bm, but not on the mageia bs :(
see :
http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/20110121084807.philippem.valstar.23877/log/botcmd.1295599743.jonund.log
thanks
2011/1/21 Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com:
I've committed a patch at mandriva's svn. You could grab it.
thanks
I will also remove Requires: python-egenix-mx-base from the Mdv package too
it is not needed
2011/1/19 Michael scherer m...@zarb.org:
Because that would 1) requires a patch to rpm that we do not have or
2) patch all python packages to had %ghost on all *.pyc, and do a
compilation of
*pyc ( the 2nd part is easy, the first one is slightly harder to automate )
3) do not care about
2011/1/17 Michael scherer m...@zarb.org:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 06:15:52PM +0100, philippe makowski wrote:
Hi,
I though that I can find more time to work on this week end, but
unfortunately it was not the case.
The Mandriva doc is really not a good starter
(http://wiki.mandriva.com/en
2011/1/18 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
We can merge part of their policy , I am not against it, I just think we
should not adopt everything :)
Fine
So I'll try to
Hi,
I though that I can find more time to work on this week end, but
unfortunately it was not the case.
The Mandriva doc is really not a good starter
(http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Python_packaging_policy)
so I propose to use the Fedora one
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python) with
Hello,
looking at http://maint.mandriva.com/listpkgs.php?owner=1
I saw duplicity and python-reportlab
since I don't see them yet on the svn, I'm ok too taking care of them
I will certainly also add rubygems-fb for http://rubygems.org/gems/fb
no objection ?
71 matches
Mail list logo
