Re: [Mailman-Developers] About working on Issue #67

2016-03-01 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Barry Warsaw writes: > It's true that the bulk of the translation work project-wide will be for > Postorius and Hyperkitty. Both of those are Django projects, and I'm sure > Django has i18n support, although I really don't know much about those > details. The OP is already aware of Django's

Re: [Mailman-Developers] About working on Issue #67

2016-03-01 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Saurav Kumar writes: > No it wasn't for GSoC, OK, good! Then you can work on this without time pressure. > i just wanted to do something in opensource and this issue caught > my attention as it was labelled as "beginner friendly" . I went > through the links attached and felt that i can do

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSOC '16 Help

2016-03-01 Thread Pranjal Yadav
Hello Vatsal, Welcome to the Mailman community > Hey Devs, > I was going through the list of projects for GSOC '16, and mailman seemed > interesting. Though i read the FAQs, can anyone please guide me about how > to get started? there are a lot of projects, contribution, application and > all...

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Resuming mailman contribution

2016-03-01 Thread Pranjal Yadav
On 1 Mar 2016 8:27 pm, "Barry Warsaw" wrote: > > On Mar 01, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Pranjal Yadav wrote: > > >For those who don't know me, I was a part of GSoC 2015 with Mailman, I > >worked on the dynamic sublists aka dlist project. Terri and Steve mentored > >me for this project and except for the t

[Mailman-Developers] GSOC '16 Help

2016-03-01 Thread Vatsal Parekh
Hey Devs, I was going through the list of projects for GSOC '16, and mailman seemed interesting. Though i read the FAQs, can anyone please guide me about how to get started? there are a lot of projects, contribution, application and all... what should be the first step to follow for me? I am a inte

Re: [Mailman-Developers] About working on Issue #67

2016-03-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 01, 2016, at 11:13 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >I'm certainly happy to see somebody interested in working on this! >However, I have some questions about exactly what the development >strategy should be (see my comment on #67). We should talk about it >on this list so everybody sees it,

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Resuming mailman contribution

2016-03-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 01, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Pranjal Yadav wrote: >For those who don't know me, I was a part of GSoC 2015 with Mailman, I >worked on the dynamic sublists aka dlist project. Terri and Steve mentored >me for this project and except for the timezone issue, I felt the >mentorship was one of the best

Re: [Mailman-Developers] About working on Issue #67

2016-03-01 Thread Saurav Kumar
No it wasn't for GSoC, i just wanted to do something in opensource and this issue caught my attention as it was labelled as "beginner friendly" . I went through the links attached and felt that i can do this. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > I'm certainly happy to see

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Regexp filtering

2016-03-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 01, 2016, at 11:13 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >In theory we could use globs as well (some of the modern VCSes permit >glob or regexp syntax), but it's not a serious data loss issue for a >VCS if a mistake is made. You just run the add command again with -f, >or uncommit, or whatever.

[Mailman-Developers] About working on Issue #67

2016-03-01 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
I'm certainly happy to see somebody interested in working on this! However, I have some questions about exactly what the development strategy should be (see my comment on #67). We should talk about it on this list so everybody sees it, then move to #67 (or wherever) when the strategic issues are c

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Regexp filtering

2016-03-01 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Adam McGreggor writes: > Or could we meet user expectations (real users, not geeks), [and > allow glob syntax]. Definitely worth discussing, but my initial reaction is negative for the reasons discussed below. > Simples: > *@mail.ru > *@*mail.ru > ?@mail.ru Are those ancho

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Regexp filtering

2016-03-01 Thread Adam McGreggor
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:37:16AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Barry Warsaw writes: > > > IBan would need to have a flag which indicate whether the `email` > > is a literal address or a pattern. I don't think it's worth having > > two separate interfaces/models, but we might want to re