On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:42:40PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> I also made the source-code modification so that the default
> action for held messages is "discard" as opposed to "defer". This
> way, I can get rid of hundreds of held messages in a single button
> click. Yes, more dangero
At 22:42 +0200 8/28/2003, Brad Knowles wrote:
> There is already the option "Should the list moderators get
>immediate notice of new requests, as well as daily notices about
>collected ones?", which I was very grateful to be able to turn off.
Perhaps more useful the list admin could set peri
At 10:21 -0400 8/28/2003, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> In additon to the full subscription option there could perhaps be a thread
>> subscription which would subscribe the sender to only receive mails from the
>> thread started by him/her. This might become somewhat heavy though.
>
>It's a great idea tha
At 10:21 AM -0400 2003/08/28, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Another thing I'd like to do is to make it an option to free all the
held messages of someone who posted before they were a member, and then
became a member, without explicit admin approval.
I'd also like to see an update to the spam checking.
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 03:00, Madsen Wikholm wrote:
> I'm not really for using the challenge/response system for personal mail since
> I get much mail from unknown senders. But for a list that would normally be
> open it would cut down on the spam. I used to have my lists open but due to
> spam I'v
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:03:38PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I'm beginning to think that I may have to put out a Mailman 2.2 and if
> so, this feature would be a good candidate.
I'd also really like to get my RSS patch in (patch #657951).
--amk
___
* Barry Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Robert Millan mentioned ASK, which I hadn't heard about before, but it
> also makes me think of TMDA.
Yupp, challenge/response was exactly what I was thinking of. One could
ofcourse use the TMDA or ASK for this but being included in mailman directly
woul
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 10:39, Madsen Wikholm wrote:
> While reading an article about spam-prevention it hit me that one way to
> easily cut down on spam on an open list, would be to have mailman send out a
> confirmation message for non-member posts. If the sender confirms then,
> address gets adde
Sounds a lot like ASK (Active Spam Killer)
http://www.paganini.net/ask/
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:39:19PM +0300, Madsen Wikholm wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Lately I've been getting a lot of spam to many of the lists that I
> administer.
>
> While reading an article about spam-prevention it hit me that
Hi!
Lately I've been getting a lot of spam to many of the lists that I
administer.
While reading an article about spam-prevention it hit me that one way to
easily cut down on spam on an open list, would be to have mailman send out a
confirmation message for non-member posts. If the sender confirm
10 matches
Mail list logo
