> "Tokio" == Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the status of these bugs?
> bug #974290 unknown encoding crashes qrunner
> bug #926034 crashes on encoding errors
Tokio> Well, these problems are essentially from absence of codecs
Tokio> for the charset used.
I
Hi,
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
"Tokio" == Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What is the status of these bugs?
bug #974290 unknown encoding crashes qrunner
bug #926034 crashes on encoding errors
Tokio> Well, these problems are essentially from absence of codecs
Tokio> for the
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 20:07, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> Sorry my response is slow :-)
No worries!
> Yeah, I think I can contribute 2.2 while you are at 3.0. Looking back
> the design notes, we have already some of 2.2 features in 2.1.6.
> http://zope.org/Members/bwarsaw/MailmanDesignNotes/MailmanTwo
On 12/1/2004 6:05, "Barry Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no problems requiring Python 2.4 for Mailman 2.2, although I
> would like to get some feedback from the community before we decide for
> sure. I wouldn't be opposed to requiring at least Python 2.3, but I
> definitely think we
> "Tokio" == Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tokio> Try the latest source from CVS before start
Tokio> hacking. CookHeaders.py in question is heavily patched for
Tokio> inclusion of sequence number in subject_prefix. The bug may
Tokio> be fixed as a side effect. ;-)
On Dec 1, 2004, at 8:49 AM, John W. Baxter wrote:
On 12/1/2004 6:05, "Barry Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have no problems requiring Python 2.4 for Mailman 2.2, although I
would like to get some feedback from the community before we decide
for
sure. I wouldn't be opposed to requiring at le
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 09:05, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > May be we can go forward to requirement of Python 2.4 because CJK codecs
> > are integreted there.
>
> I have no problems requiring Python 2.4 for Mailman 2.2, although I
> would like to get some feedback from the community before we decide for
Hi!
I just realized that there items in the queue of *open* bugs on the
sf.net tracker which date back to year 2000 and that there is a total of
at least *270 bugs with status "open"* on the BTS.
If I wouldn't know that Mailman is actually under regular development,
this would make me think it was
