Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.7.cp2

Tiffany Miller wrote: >So, I can't 'see' the mailman error logs or the file system. I can only view >the file manager through my FTP program or cpanel. I checked the error logs >for the site, but nothing shows from today. > >And not sure if it helps, but when I try to edit *any* of the public ht

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trying to tighten up my security...

Jon D. Slater wrote: > >I installed the patch, and tested it (by trying to send an e-mail to the >group from an e-mail that I knew wasn't in the group). It was rejected (as >expected). > >I just had an e-mail get through from a non-member! > >The e-mail is from: "Bernardo Spicer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trying to tighten up my security...

Okay... Next hitch... I installed the patch, and tested it (by trying to send an e-mail to the group from an e-mail that I knew wasn't in the group). It was rejected (as expected). I just had an e-mail get through from a non-member! The e-mail is from: "Bernardo Spicer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wh

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.7.cp2

Mark, thanks for the tips. Unfortunately, I do not have access to the root level of this web site, as it's hosted on another server. I'm almost to the point where I will have my own space on a server with access to the root level for my clients, but until then, I'm stuck. So, I can't 'see' the

Re: [Mailman-Users] rejecting spam disables local subscribers on remote lists

At 1:53 PM -0400 2006-07-19, James Ralston wrote: > Another possibility would be to allow our recipients to opt out of the > spam rejecting. But this is a last-ditch option. I'm in the process of writing an anti-spam article to be published on the LOPSA.org website. Suffice it to say that, i

Re: [Mailman-Users] rejecting spam disables local subscribers on remotelists

James Ralston wrote: >We recently implemented a policy such that any incoming message that >scores higher than 10 with SpamAssassin is rejected at our MX servers >with: > >550 5.7.0 message not delivered due to suspect content A SpamAssassin score of 10 is pretty liberal. I suspect your user

Re: [Mailman-Users] stange domain/url question

Anne Ramey wrote: > >Mark Sapiro wrote: > >>> > >>> >Please address all questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> This makes no sense. It shouldn't be -admin because that's a Mailman >> 2.0.x artifact, but the 'mailman' site list didn't appear until 2.1. >> >You are incorrect. That is not a ty

Re: [Mailman-Users] subject filtering

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> subject: \*SPAM\* > >i tried with it also on bounce matching header , but i got the same error as >above. Perhaps there is some issue with the character set. Those characters must be entered as equivalent to us-ascii and must not be translated by your web server.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.7.cp2

Tiffany Miller wrote: >Mailman version: 2.1.7.cp2 >Operating System: Linux >Apache version 1.3.36 (unix) See >I was trying to edit the welcome message subscribers receive upon confirming >subscription to a newsletter maili

Re: [Mailman-Users] FW: FW: No One Can Post a Message but the Server

Greg Sims wrote: >And the answer is ... The newsletter was held. > >[1] Subject: God's Vineyard -- The Power of His Presence > Size: 6493 bytes > Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list > Received: Wed Jul 19 04:23:01 2006 The "Approved: pw" header is not working. I don't know wh

[Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.7.cp2

Mailman version: 2.1.7.cp2 Operating System: Linux Apache version 1.3.36 (unix) I was trying to edit the welcome message subscribers receive upon confirming subscription to a newsletter mailing list for my client. I accessed the admin interface through cpanel and clicked on the link to "edit pu

[Mailman-Users] rejecting spam disables local subscribers on remote lists

We recently implemented a policy such that any incoming message that scores higher than 10 with SpamAssassin is rejected at our MX servers with: 550 5.7.0 message not delivered due to suspect content We've discovered that this policy has interaction problems with recipients at our site who ar

Re: [Mailman-Users] stange domain/url question

Mark Sapiro wrote: >> > >> >Please address all questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > This makes no sense. It shouldn't be -admin because that's a Mailman > 2.0.x artifact, but the 'mailman' site list didn't appear until 2.1. > > Assuming this is a typo and is really [EMAIL PROTECTED], I > proc

Re: [Mailman-Users] FW: FW: No One Can Post a Message but the Server

And the answer is ... The newsletter was held. [1] Subject: God's Vineyard -- The Power of His Presence Size: 6493 bytes Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list Received: Wed Jul 19 04:23:01 2006 The header line in the newsletter looks like this: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mailman-Users] subject filtering

Idézet (Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>): > Patrick Bogen wrote: > >> On 7/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I've tried to put the >>> "subject: .*\*SPAM\*.*" line into the bounce_matching_headers and it >>> gave me an >>> error , i try to translate it to english from hungari

Re: [Mailman-Users] stange domain/url question

Anne Ramey wrote: >Not too long ago, we switched out domain from wwwadm.mydomain.com to >lists.mydomain.com. I used fix-url on all the lists, and when we create >all lists now, we create then as >./newlist [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >you can get info about using it by sending a message >with just t

Re: [Mailman-Users] subject filtering

Patrick Bogen wrote: >On 7/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've tried to put the >> "subject: .*\*SPAM\*.*" line into the bounce_matching_headers and it >> gave me an >> error , i try to translate it to english from hungarian. : "in the bounce >> matching headers box you mus

[Mailman-Users] stange domain/url question

Not too long ago, we switched out domain from wwwadm.mydomain.com to lists.mydomain.com. I used fix-url on all the lists, and when we create all lists now, we create then as ./newlist [EMAIL PROTECTED] But when the email is sent to the administrator for these new lists it has wwwadm.mydomain.c

Re: [Mailman-Users] subject filtering

On 7/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've tried to put the > "subject: .*\*SPAM\*.*" line into the bounce_matching_headers and it > gave me an > error , i try to translate it to english from hungarian. : "in the bounce > matching headers box you must give a valid filter line,

Re: [Mailman-Users] subject filtering

Hi Patrick! I've tried to put the "subject: .*\*SPAM\*.*" line into the bounce_matching_headers and it gave me an error , i try to translate it to english from hungarian. : "in the bounce matching headers box you must give a valid filter line, unless it will be ignored" and u asked me wheather *