At 9:06 AM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
Well a lot has been generated in this discussion already, now it's just a
case of summarising it and having someone edit. I like writing, and would
happily contribute but I can drag on a bit so need a good editor :-P
Yeah, I have that
Brad Knowles writes:
At 2:07 AM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
(locally) it's been referred to as a be strict in what you send, relaxed
in
what you receive approach but not everyone adheres to (or is aware of)
this
way of looking at things and it seems antiquated to
Need professional help finishing the installation of Mailman on my Fedora Core
5 server.
I have completed the install steps up to chapter 6 with no errors. Also have
Postfix installed and working.
--
Rob Robson
Chillicothe, Ohio
PGP (See Headers)
http://www.rob-robson.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cd to Mailman's home, run bin/show_qfiles dir_of_queue_in_question/*
Actually, in this case it would be
bin/show_qfiles data/heldmsg*
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B.
Bretton Vine wrote:
Mark Sapiro said the following on 2006/08/31 02:55 AM:
Do you have an actual message?
Yes
Where did this message come from?
A list-member, cc'd to non-list member (subsequently subbed)
It occurred to me that if the list has archives, the raw message as
sent to the list
At 8:25 AM -0700 2006-08-31, Mark Sapiro quoted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
cd to Mailman's home, run bin/show_qfiles dir_of_queue_in_question/*
Actually, in this case it would be
bin/show_qfiles data/heldmsg*
To be pedantic, if the moderation queue is that large, then wildcard
expansion on the
Is there a way to add additional fields for the subscribers? I would
like to also have the subscribers include their address and phone
numbers. Is there a way to add these fields?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
John W. Baxter said the following on 2006/08/31 06:58 PM:
And, unfortunately, were I preparing a list of options for a You really
ought to look at these options and check that they are set appropriately
paragraph, I probably wouldn't include this one. There are so many which
are more
Hello,
Currently View subscribers list displays members in the following format:
first.last at my.domain.com
Is it possible to change the format to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
Tom
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
Bretton Vine sent the message below at 10:08 8/31/2006:
John W. Baxter said the following on 2006/08/31 06:58 PM:
And, unfortunately, were I preparing a list of options for a You really
ought to look at these options and check that they are set appropriately
paragraph, I probably wouldn't
--On August 31, 2006 7:08:22 PM +0200 Bretton Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Perhaps a list of you /really/ should set these settings to X would be
useful to people short on time :-) Of course you could just bundle the
product that way in the first place but where's the fun in that?
To which
Dragon said the following on 2006/08/31 07:44 PM:
But if you don't like the defaults or have a reason to choose a
different setting, you can change them at your own risk either through
configuring each list or by overriding the setting in mm_cfg.py
I'm not criticising, and I'm more than
Dragon said the following on 2006/08/31 07:44 PM:
The fact that people like Brad and Mark and others are willing to expend
large amounts of their time responding to queries here should be taken as
what it is, another gift to the community. I think they have gone above
and beyond the call of
Steve Burling said the following on 2006/08/31 07:55 PM:
Could we maybe leave this poor dead horse to rest in peace?
Only if I get a last word in edgewise :-)
Apparently, many of the posters to this list believe (with some
justification, imho) that it should take explicit action to undo safe
That workes!
Thanks folks.
On 8/31/06, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Kavanaugh wrote:
Currently View subscribers list displays members in the following
format:
first.last at my.domain.com
Is it possible to change the format to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the list admin
Hello,
I installed and configured mailman on Debian Sarge running apache2 and exim4.
I set up a list and the list adminstrator / owner can post to the list from a
remote client. I am pretty sure that the mailman config is right and that
there is a problem with the exim4 config. Non local
Is there a way to incorporate this change across all exisitng mail lists?
I looked at commands in mailman/bin but did not find any command that could
do this for me. Or, am I missing something?
Later,
Tom
On 8/31/06, Tom Kavanaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That workes!
Thanks folks.
On
Oliver König wrote:
I am pretty sure that the mailman config is right and that
there is a problem with the exim4 config. Non local subscribers cannot post
to the list. The Exim4 log always says that relay is not permitted.
Yes, that would be an Exim config problem.
Here are parts of my
Tom Kavanaugh wrote:
Is there a way to incorporate this change across all exisitng mail lists?
I looked at commands in mailman/bin but did not find any command that could
do this for me. Or, am I missing something?
First, you want to put
DEFAULT_OBSCURE_ADDRESSES = No
in mm_cfg.py so new
At 10:06 AM -0700 2006-08-31, John W. Baxter quoted Brad Knowles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We're not a commercial environment, and we've actually had pretty bad
experiences with people/companies that are in commercial environments
taking our software and making unapproved modifications to it, or
At 8:44 PM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
The point I was illustrating is that if you have to justify the rationale
behind a default setting to a third-party-decision-maker -- what is the most
appropriate and concise response?
This is the key point that was not coming across to me,
At 8:25 PM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
I view it differently. I have had great feedback and I highly doubt either
of the parties mentioned viewed a response as a restraining, difficult
exercise. I /really/ use lists to their full advantage and with some in
particular have never
Brad Knowles writes:
At 10:06 AM -0700 2006-08-31, John W. Baxter quoted Brad Knowles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We're not a commercial environment, and we've actually had pretty bad
experiences with people/companies that are in commercial environments
taking our software and making
23 matches
Mail list logo
