On 2/22/07, kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the email address the email is coming from is in the field:
List of non-member addresses whose postings should be automatically
accepted.
i just get: Your message was rejected. that's all. no explanation...
there is nothing in the logs.
On 2/21/07, Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I have read the other threads and the setup procedure in the manual
and tried other suggested setups too. I see the list archives show up
yet no mail ever gets delivered. It always gets stopped on delivery.
In /var/log/mailman/smtp-failure I see:
As far as I know, there's no 'one click' tool to move lists around,
nor is there anything that will rewrite archives to change the old
domain (that said, a simple sed script could do this, but possibly not
reliably).
See FAQ 3.4
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq03.004.htp
On 2/22/07, Baris Basar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have posted an e-mail to a newly created list. And i want to look at list
archieves. And i get this message. No messages have been posted to this
list yet, so the archives are currently empty. And i wanna ask , what is
MTA?
The MTA is the
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Patrick Bogen wrote:
On 2/22/07, Baris Basar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have posted an e-mail to a newly created list. And i want to look at list
archieves. And i get this message. No messages have been posted to this
list yet, so the archives are currently empty. And
On 2/22/07, Baris Basar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have posted an e-mail to a newly created list. And i want to look at list
archieves. And i get this message. No messages have been posted to this
list yet, so the archives are currently empty.
Is archiving turned on for the list?
--
Mark
Baris Basar wrote:
Yes. It's on.
in response to:
Is archiving turned on for the list?
Was the post delivered to list members? Is there anything in Mailman's
error log? Is ArchRunner Running?
See
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq03.014.htp
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL
Patrick Bogen wrote:
On 2/21/07, Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In /var/log/mailman/smtp-failure I see:
delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with code -1:(111, Connection Refused)
This seems to indicate that mailman can't talk to the SMTP server that
it's supposed to used to send mail. What
Whitcomb, Jeff wrote:
In response to Mark's email number 9 below. I have always received
delayed messages as a list owner, and did not know that I am not
supposed to having the list configured as he mentions.
I am not trying to say how anyone is 'supposed' to have her or his list
set up in
Matthew Clarkson wrote:
I'm building a simple document sharing application to run alongside
mailman. What I would like to do is use mailmans users/passwords for
this application.
Ultimately what I would like to do is pull out all usernames
passwords and throw it all into a file for a
Carter Braxton wrote:
I'm running mailman 2.1.5 on a Ubuntu 6.0.1 server, and am going to do
an initial mass invitation to the mailing list. Is there a way to have
any invitations that bounce be forwarded to the list owner? (If not the
bounces can always be culled from the postfix log, but it
- Mailman 2.1.7
- RPM
- Redhat Fedora Linux version 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5
- Sendmail
Question: I'm setting up a Mailman system and have hit a roadblock that
looks to deal with sending and receiving messages.
What I know: I've looked through the FAQ and specfically FAQ 3.14, and am
able to get a
Jason Luck
SMTPHOST...in mm_cfg.py...no info on
DELIVERY_MODULE = 'SMTPDirect'
MTA = 'Manual'
SMTPHOST = 'localhost'
SMTPPORT = 0 # default from smtplib
SENDMAIL_CMD = '/usr/lib/sendmail'
If the above are actually indented, this is bad. They shouldn't be.
Is
I'm part of a group of people (sysops) that own several
lists. Because the group changes occasionally, we've created a Mailman
list called [EMAIL PROTECTED], and all of our lists are owned by
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. The sysops list also receives other
(non-Mailman-generated) emails.
We tried to make
Kelly Jones wrote:
We tried to make sysops owned by itself, but ran into problems: a
spammer emailed sysops, and the mail was held for moderation. However,
the sysops post requires approval message came from sysops-bounces
and went to sysops: Mailman apparently detected a loop and didn't
deliver
Alan Gutierrez wrote:
I tried using mod_proxy, but that meant that the mailman CGI was unable
to determine the hostname, and therefore, did not provide for listings
of hosted lists in /mailman/listinfo
I really don't know what you're trying to do, but if you put
VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW = Off
At 6:43 PM -0700 2/22/07, Kelly Jones wrote:
My question: what's the best way to handle a situation like this? Have
a list owned by itself or effectively owned by itself.
What I've done in situations similar to this, is to make the
listowner list itself owned by an alias that is directly
17 matches
Mail list logo
