Douglas Edwards wrote:
Can someone help?? I am using mailman on a hosting package that i purchased.
I set up a mailing list and was able to send posts for a while. They were
going out to the list members, sending the moderator approval and showing up
in the archive. Now this just stopped. I am
Wei Qin wrote:
Thanks. I tried everything on the page
http://wiki.list.org/display/DOC/4.78+Troubleshooting-+No+mail+going+out+to+lists+members
but nothing helps. Permission is correct. The qrunners and the MTA are
all up and running. Log shows that it is sending out acknowledgements,
auto
Hi Mark,
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Darren G Pifer wrote:
I asked our Exchange administrator to get the message headers. Here is
that information:
Thanks, but that by itself doesn't tell me much. It does tell me that
Mailman recast the message as multipart mixed, but I already knew
that. I
Darren G Pifer wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Thanks, but that by itself doesn't tell me much. It does tell me that
Mailman recast the message as multipart mixed, but I already knew
that. I need to see the MIME structure of the entire message including
all the sub-part headers, but even in the
I have a collegue who is experimenting with signed mail (S/MIME).
He sent me a test mail and he also sent it to a test Mailman (2.1.11)
list. Here is the basic MIME header structure for the mail sent
directly to me:
++
MIME-Version:
On 01/16/09 15:46, Barry Finkel wrote:
Note that Mailman has taken the existing three-part MIME structure
(plain-text body, HTML-formatted body, and digital signature) and
instead of placing the list footer as a fourth part in the same MIME
structure, Mailman has created a new two-part MIME
Grant Taylor wrote:
I think the more proper thing would be for something (Mailman or it's
MTA interface / handler) to validate S/MIME signed messages and process
them before passing them on.
Validation could be useful, but the more important issue is to have Mailman
completely encapsulate
If someone posts an attachment to an umbrella list, will the
subscribers to the sublists be able to access the umbrella attachment
archive? Or should umbrella lists never use scrubbing?
Thanks,
Rich
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
On 01/16/09 16:27, Brad Knowles wrote:
Validation could be useful, but the more important issue is to have
Mailman completely encapsulate signed/encrypted messages and then add
whatever additional MIME bodyparts may be necessary to complete the
other parts of the work it has been configured to
Grant Taylor wrote:
Don't change anything at all in any of the signed/encrypted part, just
treat it as an opaque object and encapsulate the whole thing.
It sounded like that is what Mailman already did and that by doing so
broke the signature.
I don't think it broke the signature, I think
Hey all,
After updating to 2.1.11 (from BSD ports, against python2.5), I'm seeing
that several of my list archives have the word True scattered througout
(at the bottoms of tables).
Something like this:
tdOctober 2008:/td
td
A
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
After updating to 2.1.11 (from BSD ports, against python2.5), I'm seeing
that several of my list archives have the word True scattered througout
(at the bottoms of tables).
Something like this:
tdOctober 2008:/td
td
A
Barry Finkel wrote:
Note that Mailman has taken the existing three-part MIME structure
(plain-text body, HTML-formatted body, and digital signature) and
instead of placing the list footer as a fourth part in the same MIME
structure, Mailman has created a new two-part MIME structure with
the
Denny Zulfikar wrote:
I am trying the manual from http://www.list.org/mailman-install/ as is.
this is my current main.cf config :
--
local_recipient_maps = $alias_maps $virtual_mailbox_maps unix:passwd.byname
alias_maps = hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases
recipient_delimiter = +
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
After updating to 2.1.11 (from BSD ports, against python2.5), I'm seeing
that several of my list archives have the word True scattered througout
(at the bottoms of tables).
Something like this:
tdOctober 2008:/td
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I took a closer look at my own archives and I see it is related to
Richard's patches, but it is not the patch that's the problem. The
'True' is supposed to be !--/htdig_noindex-- The problem is that
you have (probably in mm_cfg.py, but maybe in
16 matches
Mail list logo