Hi!
On 27/05/2020 01:08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 5/26/20 4:30 PM, Brett Delmage wrote:
[...]
>> What is the character set coding for the log files, please?
>> I'm using MM 2.1.29
>
> Basically unknown. For the most part, log files are us-ascii, but some
> entries contain user entered data such
On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 16:54 -0600, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users
wrote:
[...]
> On 05/14/2018 04:11 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > Seriously, these folks don't know what they imply.
>
> Nope. Politicians (almost) never fully understand what's going on.
FWIW and I
portant* part of a public mailinglist and be done with it?!
For almost everyone else, some "important reason" is good enough
too.
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email : be...@petrovitsch.priv.at
LUGA : http://www.luga.at
--
ive. }:-)
Does anyone know how the "blockckain is the solution to everything"
faction handles these issues?
It's not that they can ignore that either - if only to discuss the
question how personal the wallet address (or whatever it is called) is.
Or can we kill the whole problem by using a b
uot;only private,
otherwise it bandwidth and archive space waste".
And some people may actually think that saying "thank you" in public is
actually a good thing - even if it's only just the education;-)
Kind regards,
Bernd
--
Bern
On Don, 2015-03-19 at 17:45 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
[...]
also +1 for the quote only relevant and answer inline directly below
it style - an email is written once and read (hopefully;-) more often
so it is actually extremely unfriendly (because time killing) to all
others to make a mail not as
(including me) do not read HTML-Mails (but only plain/text),
also for that reason.
Kind regards,
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email : be...@petrovitsch.priv.at
LUGA : http://www.luga.at
--
Mailman
it is important to people to let everyone
know, that you are 2 days out of office. If it's not that urgent, it can
wait anyways. If it is that urgent, I should - or more must - have done
something before to handle these urgent cases.).
[ Full quote deleted. ]
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch
On Don, 2009-12-17 at 17:04 -0800, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
Lots of it depends on the MTA (general opinion is that postfix seems to be
the fastest), connectivity, and list settings (personalized email will take
Do I take the flame bait?;-)
Whatever you understand in detail under a fast MTA (and
Hi!
On Sam, 2009-05-09 at 12:51 -0700, bob 001 wrote:
[...]
Do we have any setting where we can set maximum retries for wrong
password before it locks the account or something like that?
isn't it otherwise easily breakable via bots by trying different
passwords to the same web url.
Easily?
On Die, 2008-07-01 at 16:39 +1000, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
I am unsubscribing. Thanks very much for helping with my inquiry, Mark. The
other queries don't apply to me, and I can offer no help with them.
On my inquiry, one would think that an OS that wants to rule the world would
be
On Fre, 2008-01-25 at 06:41 +, Khalil Abbas wrote:
Now this is the most logical and reasonale answer I've ever got ..
this is what I call: a reply from a professional.. she's right, I have
no idea that this is spamming.. all I know about spamming is those who
send you repeatedly every once
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 15:09 -0800, Cyndi Norwitz wrote:
[...]
I know I can edit some (all?) of these from the web interface. And I've
already set the reply-to field to my domain. But I was wondering if there
was a way to get it to change over all at once. It would take hours to
change it
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 09:06 -0400, Steve Campbell wrote:
[...]
Does anyone have a suggestion for throttling?
Just store the 22.000 outgoing mails in the mail queue (every decent MTA
should be able to do that unconditionally) and wait for the next queue
run?
Bernd
--
Firmix Software
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 10:18 -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 3:17 PM +0200 2006-06-13, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 09:06 -0400, Steve Campbell wrote:
[...]
Does anyone have a suggestion for throttling?
Just store the 22.000 outgoing mails in the mail queue (every
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 11:39 -0400, Steve Campbell wrote:
[...]
Sounds great. In fact, this is sort of what the Milter people suggested
without the milter, although I didn't see where the throttling would occur.
First you throw the 22.000 mail in the mail queue. And the normal queue
run will
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 17:36 -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 11:38 PM +0200 2006-06-13, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
[...]
You would also need to make sure that the first instance of
sendmail (or whatever MTA) is not configured to generate Delivery
Status Notices (DSNs) for delayed messages
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 11:59 -0600, Benjamin Mack wrote:
Hey everybody,
I got a difficult (for me) situation here:
I have a webserver with my domain and an outsourced mail server with a
company that set up my mail addresses (where I can create pop-accounts
through a web interface).
Sorry for wrong threading but I accidentally deleted the last email
here:
One reason is that the server may very well translate the encoding
based on negotiation with the client. (I guess you could argue that
Yes, but *if* the encoding is negotatied, a default value makes not that
much sense
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 14:05 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
I actually reported a bug (though it may not sound so): I enter
(apparently) UTF-8 text (with Firefox it that is important) and it comes
back disguised (and as part of) ISO-8859-1 text.
The question is: Which part
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 10:55 -0700, Jim Marlowe Futrell wrote:
[...]
We use this software and continue to get the following error message
(see below). Is there anything that can be adjusted in order to send
larger messages?
Yes.
Also, we can not send messages with attached files. What
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 12:52 +0200, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
[...]
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:58:37PM +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
Apparently all of the German translation of Mailman is in ISO-8859-1 (or
ISO-8859-15) - at least in the standard Debian mailman package.
Is there a special
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 09:52 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
[...]
As Brad points out in another reply, some of this problem is because
all text entered in the web interface (except for General
Options-info which is a special case) is HTML escaped to prevent XSS
attacks. Mailman arguably goes
Hi!
I get the following on mailman-2.1.5 on Debian-Sarge:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/mailman/cron/disabled, line 222, in ?
main()
File /usr/lib/mailman/cron/disabled, line 205, in main
mlist.sendNextNotification(member)
File
Hi all!
Is there a possibility to disable the member subscription/unsubscription
through the web interface?
The list-members are added and removed with a script which is fed from a
DB so there is no point in self-subscription.
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH
On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 13:16 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
I found
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2005-July/018161.html
and did what is described there and it doesn't help anything.
Any other idea?
Are you sure you didn't make a mistake or overlook
On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 17:41 -0400, Steve Burling wrote:
Does mailman, as it's sending out list mail, check to see whether someone
it's about to send a copy to is also mentioned in the cc: field, and then
not send it to avoid duplicates? I run a small mailman installation on a
home server,
On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 21:23 +0200, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:11:00PM +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
Hi all!
Is there a possibility to disable the member subscription/unsubscription
through the web interface?
The list-members are added and removed with a script
Apparently all of the German translation of Mailman is in ISO-8859-1 (or
ISO-8859-15) - at least in the standard Debian mailman package.
Is there a special reason for not moving to UTF-8 in general?
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664
On Don, 2004-02-05 at 07:55, Mark Dadgar wrote:
On Feb 4, 2004, at 10:35 PM, Thomas Hochstein wrote:
[...]
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
This is totally ridiculous.
No. Reply-To set to the list is evil (and for God's sake actually almost
no list I know of uses it).
The
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 22:28, Jon Carnes wrote:
[...]
If however you find that messages spend a long time in the queue before
being processed (or web-access to the list configuration is very slow to
load) then you might want to consider putting aside some ram for use as
a disk. You can copy
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 23:09, Warren Woodward wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:55:26PM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
Do they prefer to have messages which they thought would be
private replies being blasted to the whole list?
The reality of the modern, public internet is that the
Hi all!
How does one handle multiple From:-email-addresses for one person within
mailman?
With majordomo, there was a hack/patch to have a separate (possibly
site-wide) alias-mailinglist which is used for the list membership test
(and administered similar to an ordinary mailinglist), but never
33 matches
Mail list logo
