On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:05:58 +0900
Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
I doubt that has been updated. Recently, most users
seem to prefer
the bundled archiver (Pipermail), or 3rd party services.
Richard used
to be a regular on Mailman channels but I haven't seen
him for a
while.
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:19:20 -0800
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
Just for fun, I applied both the prerequisite
modinc-2.1.12-0.1.patch
and the mhonarc-2.1.12-0.1.patch to Mailman 2.1.18-1
Both patches failed to patch Mailman/Version.py because
the 2.1.18-1
DATA_FILE_VERSION is 105 and
I realize MHonArc is not part of Mailman.
The Mailman FAQ indicates patches are available at
http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/mhonarc/index.html
The patches listed there are up to version 2.1.12 of
Mailman. Anyone aware of any patches for Mailman 2.1.18?
Or even 2.1.17?
Thank you
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:15:11 -0700
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
As far as posting to a list is concerned, Mailman is looking for an
X-BeenThere: header with the list address. It does look at a
Precedence: header and will not process commands from or autorespond
to Precedence 'bulk',
Is there something specific Mailman is looking for to detect autoreponders,
like Out of Office messages? We had an incident this weekend with an
autoresponder sending an out of office message over and over and overto a
list.
This particular autoresponder is not known to be broken. Its
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:06:10 +0100
Andrew Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since I moved my list from Freelists to our own server running
Mailman
(2.1.11), I am getting complaints from Outlook users, and quite a
few of
them are managing to post messages to the bounce address.
When they
On Sat, 17 May 2008 06:40:15 +0100
Richard Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For anyone that uses them, I now have put MM 2.1.10 compatible
versions of the various Mailman patches I maintain up on my web site
at:
http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/index.html
Patches are as follows:
Sourceforge
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:29:47 -0500
Forrest Sheng Bao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am just beginning to use Mailman and found a strange problem. I
haven
enabled *Receive your own posts to the list* in my personal
options. Since
I am also the admin, I also unchecked the not metoo box of
Thanks for the feedback. What I find most frustrating is sites just
trusting this stuff without thought. Our spam filter caught it,
therefore it is bad. You have a problem and are sending spam. Sigh.
If I am able to walk them through the look at the topic being
discussed some come around.
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:10:38 -0700
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bottom line is there is a bug in MaildirRunner.py.
It doesn't work
with hyphenated list names as it conflates the last part
of the name
with the -bounces, -request, etc. suffixes.
hummm...We have not had problems
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:30:50 -0400
Datatude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there --
I'm a new very lightweight mailman list owner, with
almost no
experience doing anything (beyond using the Plesk c.p.)
on my domain server.
One list I jsut started has already started accruing in
the
I am trying to convert a list from the Pipermail archiver
to MhonArc.
I can run /bin/arch --wipe listname successfully.
I get this error when generating the MhonArc archive with
/bin/arch listname
Pickling archive state into
/data/mailman/archives/private/listname/pipermail.pck
Traceback
Is there a away to place a list member on hold. That
is, set them to nomail and prevent them from logging in
to change back to getting mail. Of course we can
unsubscribe the member. We have a need to sometimes
review a member's membership status on the lists. The
list administrators
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:54:59 -0800
Bob Morse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you all for your insights in the
Challenge/Response question. I am
convinced this is not the way to go. In fact, I used
some of the same
arguments to the client when he brought it up.
The problem remains,
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:18:26 -0800
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl Zander wrote:
Fundamentally, its not a technology problem.
Agreed, but as others have suggested, technology can
help.
Yes. I didn't mean to imply it could not. We are using
technology to help us manage
Is there a command I can run to change all members of a
list to a nomail setting? And then change it back? I
didn't see anything in the FAQ. I do have root access on
the server. Running MM 2.1.8.
--Karl
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
It is possible to get around list moderation? We have a
closed, moderated list. There is only one list
administrator. He claims he did not approve a message that
was sent on to the list.
Is it possible to craft a message that already contains
the
X-Mailman-Approved-At: header and get by
to fight this besides moderating everything? I have
noted FAQ 3.46 so I am guessing that full moderation is
our best way for now. mmreencrypt does not look too
current.
--Karl
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:36:25 -0800
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl Zander wrote:
It is possible to get
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 07:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Jack Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot modify the post-prosessing script because I
use the program Mhonarc to generate the searchable
version of my archives since Mailman does not include
that feature. It has the nice feature of truly
We use the htdig integration with Mailman 2.1.8. We seem
to have one problem, not all the dbs are rebuilt when the
cron job runs.
For example
-rw-rw-r-- 1 mailman mailman 110979072 Aug 5 02:22
db.docdb
-rw-rw-r-- 1 mailman mailman 3568640 Jul 25 21:41
db.docs.index
-rw-rw-r-- 1
We are interesting in customizing some of the messages
Mailman generates back to members. We would like to
customize the message a non-member gets if they try to
post.
The FAQ talks about how to customize a welcome message for
an announcement list.
We have noticed a problems with gmail accounts. Someone
posting a message from a gmail account to a list will not
get a copy of their message back. The message goes to the
list fine and even other gmail accounts will get the
message. Its the sender on gmail that will not get a copy
of
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:15:06 -0700
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl Zander wrote:
This is not a gmail/Mailman issue. It is a gmail
feature. Gmail
recognizes it already has a copy of that message (same
message ID i
think) in the conversation and doesn't think you need to
see
11:26:39 -0400
Karl Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the htdig patches applied and the search works
for
the most part. There are two (hopefully) small problems
that I haven't been able to track down.
Using Mailman 2.1.7
1. I only seem able to display 100 search results
I have the htdig patches applied and the search works for
the most part. There are two (hopefully) small problems
that I haven't been able to track down.
Using Mailman 2.1.7
1. I only seem able to display 100 search results. If a
search finds 1022 results, only 100 can actually be
I note that on the Mailman website this is some nice
documention for users written by Terri Oda (and others I
gather.) It is allowed to give that out to my users? I
do not see anything about how it is licensed.
--Karl
--
Mailman-Users
Thank you to everyone who replied to this thread.
The python code from Mark below worked nicley to convert
the date formats. My imported archives are visiable in
Mailman.
--Karl
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:43:15 -0800
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The method in the FAQ is much more
Hello,
Using mm 2.1.7 with the patches for htdig and MHonArc
applied.
We have messages in mbox format that we want to import.
As per 5.1 from the FAQ, we used
bin/arch list archives/private/list.mbox/list.mbox
where list is our list name. We did create the list
before attempting to
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:39:35 -0800
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl Zander wrote:
We have messages in mbox format that we want to import.
As per 5.1 from the FAQ, we used
bin/arch list
archives/private/list.mbox/list.mbox
where list is our list name. We did create the list
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:16:31 -0800
Greg Lindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 06:48:43PM -0500, Karl Zander
wrote:
New messages sent to the list get appended to the end of
the mbox file OK and do display in the archive.
Compare the From lines (not From:). I had
30 matches
Mail list logo
