Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being sent with messages.

On 11/02/2015 02:25 AM, Adam Morris wrote: > Hi all, > > most messages sent to lists seem to have some sort of attachment. > If I go to non digest options and turn on the feature to scrub > attachments if messages are sent using html there is no body to the > message. See the FAQ article at

[Mailman-Users] attachments being sent with messages.

Hi all, most messages sent to lists seem to have some sort of attachment. If I go to non digest options and turn on the feature to scrub attachments if messages are sent using html there is no body to the message. Is there a way to not have attachments in messages but still have html messages h

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments sent with Apple Mail being stripped

On 08/15/2015 05:57 PM, Nick Tonkin wrote: > Hi all, I'm having a problem with mailman stripping attachments from > messages sent with Apple Mail. It looks like the content-type is > multipart/related, but I have added that to my list of allowed > content-types and the jpeg still gets removed. Any

[Mailman-Users] Attachments sent with Apple Mail being stripped

Hi all, I'm having a problem with mailman stripping attachments from messages sent with Apple Mail. It looks like the content-type is multipart/related, but I have added that to my list of allowed content-types and the jpeg still gets removed. Any ideas please? - nick -

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments not getting through at random...

On 06/21/2015 10:55 AM, Nick Stevens via Mailman-Users wrote: > Hi All, > I'm new to the list - I did search the archives, but cannot find anything > covering my specific case. In the future and when following up, please post from your subscribed (...@gmail.com) address, not ...@googlemail.com. O

[Mailman-Users] Attachments not getting through at random...

Hi All, I'm new to the list - I did search the archives, but cannot find anything covering my specific case. My problem is with attachments to my list. For some users, attachments never get through. I'm sure it is not the file, in a couple of cases I asked the senders to CC my personal, email add

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments AND no-attachments...

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > Richard Troy wrote: > > > >In sum, it would be _fantastic_ if list subscribers have an > >option to receive or not receive attachments on a per-user basis, much as > >users can now elect to recieve digests. But, as that option doesn't appear > >to exist

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments AND no-attachments...

Richard Troy wrote: > >In sum, it would be _fantastic_ if list subscribers have an >option to receive or not receive attachments on a per-user basis, much as >users can now elect to recieve digests. But, as that option doesn't appear >to exist, I was thinking I could facilitate the same effect by u

[Mailman-Users] Attachments AND no-attachments...

Hello everyone, I've been using mailman a while, but it's not my primary thing, and I'm a little lost on how I can configure things to get what I'm looking for. I strongly suspect that configuring things the right way can accomplish my goals. Up until now many list participants have been clammor

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments dir question

Savoy, Jim wrote: > >I was wrong - an attachment directory was indeed created for my second >message as well. >In looking at the creation dates for that list, they always seem to be >created sometime >the next day after 3:00 am. Since the only cron job I run at that time for >Mailman is >senddigest

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments dir question

Thanks Stephen. I was wrong - an attachment directory was indeed created for my second message as well. In looking at the creation dates for that list, they always seem to be created sometime the next day after 3:00 am. Since the only cron job I run at that time for Mailman is senddigests, I guess

[Mailman-Users] attachments dir question

Savoy, Jim writes: > I was wondering what it is that determines if a message has "scrubbed > attachments". The options you have set for filtering and the MIME structure of the message does. One possible explanation of your observation is that for some reason the first message had only a text/h

[Mailman-Users] attachments dir question

Hi all - I am running Mailman 2.1.5 (still!). I was wondering what it is that determines if a message has "scrubbed attachments". For instance, a couple of days ago, I sent a simple message to one of my lists - just a sentence or two of text, and it created a directory under /archives/private/list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: >Kikuchi-san, Mark-san, > >I will ask the customer to consider patching it. > >Thanks a million!!! > >Best Regards, > >Tokio Kikuchi wrote: >> (10/03/04 11:47), Masaharu Kawada wrote: >> >>> Hi Mark-san, Kikuchi-san, >>> >>> Thank you very much for your help. >>> >>> Just

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Kikuchi-san, Mark-san, I will ask the customer to consider patching it. Thanks a million!!! Best Regards, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: (10/03/04 11:47), Masaharu Kawada wrote: Hi Mark-san, Kikuchi-san, Thank you very much for your help. Just to make sure, about the patch, is it just need to be

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

(10/03/04 11:47), Masaharu Kawada wrote: > Hi Mark-san, Kikuchi-san, > > Thank you very much for your help. > > Just to make sure, about the patch, is it just need to be modified in the > way you mentioned? Which means that it should be look like below. Yes, its OK. > > # vi /usr/lib/python2.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Hi Mark-san, Kikuchi-san, Thank you very much for your help. Just to make sure, about the patch, is it just need to be modified in the way you mentioned? Which means that it should be look like below. # vi /usr/lib/python2.4/email/Charset.py -- 243 def convert(self, s): 244

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Hi, (10/03/04 1:58), Mark Sapiro wrote: > Masaharu Kawada wrote: >> >> There is one thing that I wonder, is that if the charset.py is done with >> that patch, what the current digest.mbox exsisted under lists/ >> are supposed to be? Do they need to be deleted or not? My point on >> this is that on

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: > >There is one thing that I wonder, is that if the charset.py is done with >that patch, what the current digest.mbox exsisted under lists/ >are supposed to be? Do they need to be deleted or not? My point on >this is that once the patch is done, is there nothing else to do to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Hello Kikuchi-san, As far as I checked the error messages and compared with each one, The problem of my customer's seems to be almost the same as one posted to the thread written in the last Kikuchi-san's email. There is one thing that I wonder, is that if the charset.py is done with that patch,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Hello kikuchi-san, Thank you for your response with a precious information. Since I am a beginner for mailman, any comments/suggestions such as this kind of thing are very helpful for me. Including what Mark-san have been doing for me and you have done for me as well, I really appreciate the coop

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

(10/03/03 16:54), Masaharu Kawada wrote: > Hi Mark-san, > > I got a reply from the customer, but it was not possbile for the customer > to provide the whole digest.mbox to us due to their policy. However, > sevral parts of the error log and digest.mbox's content have been provided. > As for the e

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Hi Mark-san, I got a reply from the customer, but it was not possbile for the customer to provide the whole digest.mbox to us due to their policy. However, sevral parts of the error log and digest.mbox's content have been provided. As for the error messages, please see the attachment. And as fo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark-san, Thank you very much for your response. I was kind of misunderstanding about what the send_digest() does before, but I now got better knowledge on it because of your explanations for me. I very much appreciate it!! I have asked the customer for providing the digest.mbox(s) to us and wai

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: > >So, it doesn't matter if the senddigest fais or not, there are no >retries. And, >senddigest via cron runs only once a day at noon. However, whenever >messages posted to the list, send_digest() will called based on the size of >digest_size_threshhold, and try to send dige

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark-san, Thank you very much for your respose. There are no retries per se. The list has a setting digest_size_threshhold (on its Digest options page). When a post arrives that makes the digest.mbox bigger than digest_size_threshhold, a digest is triggered immediately. In this case, the digest

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: > >I am sorry that I would like to know one more thing about >digestable in advance. > >>>--- >>>xxx xx xx:xx:xx 2010 (2129) send_digests() failed: EUC-JP decoding error: >>>invalid character .. >>>xxx xx xx:xx:xx 2010 (2129) send_digests() failed: EUC-JP decoding error:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark-san, I am sorry that I would like to know one more thing about digestable in advance. --- xxx xx xx:xx:xx 2010 (2129) send_digests() failed: EUC-JP decoding error: invalid character .. xxx xx xx:xx:xx 2010 (2129) send_digests() failed: EUC-JP decoding error: invalid character .. xx

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: > > >There was no need to turn off digestable and archive if they were only > >going to be turned on again. > >I did some research and found information that it is necessary to disable >those options if you want to delete attachments manually, otherwise >something >unclaim m

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark-san, Thank you very much for your help. I will try to get all of the digest.mbox located on under lists/LISTNAME/ from the customer. Though it might be difficult since digest.mbox consists confidential information for the customer. I will update as soon as I get the result from the custom

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark-san, Thank you very much for your help. >There was no need to turn off digestable and archive if they were only >going to be turned on again. I did some research and found information that it is necessary to disable those options if you want to delete attachments manually, otherwise somet

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark Sapiro wrote: > > I consider this behavior to be a bug. I'll look into fixing it. I think > what I'll need to do is just move the digest.mbox aside and log an > error message. It would be better if I could just bypass the bad > message, but that may be difficult. I have created a bug report

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: > >Firtst of all, one of my customer wanted to delete attachments to >make more disk spaces on the server. The server's disk resource >was getting full because the size of the directory for attachments >was very big. So the customer did the following works first. > >Digest op

[Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Dear list, I am kind of new to use mailman on administrative, so if this is an known issue I'm sorry. I would very much appreciate it if you would kindly answer my questions. Firtst of all, one of my customer wanted to delete attachments to make more disk spaces on the server. The server's disk r

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments renamed in archives

Gruver, Sandi wrote: >I have this line in the mm_cfg.py file: >SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION = True, but attachments (.pdf) are >being renamed to .obj. > >Can you please give a big hint as to what do I need to do to fix this? Do the MIME headers of the attachment have a Content-Di

[Mailman-Users] attachments renamed in archives

I have this line in the mm_cfg.py file: SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION = True, but attachments (.pdf) are being renamed to .obj. Can you please give a big hint as to what do I need to do to fix this? Thank you, S. Gruver Unix System Administrator SBCTC-IT Bellevue, WA 98004 425.803

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Added to All Messages I Send

Edwin Shao wrote: > >So, that's what I thought the problem might be, but I use my school's >Mailman server as well and they don't have this problem. That is, I can send >HTML messages to the list and also have footers enabled. How do I enable >that function for my Mailman server? If you are sendi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Added to All Messages I Send

So, that's what I thought the problem might be, but I use my school's Mailman server as well and they don't have this problem. That is, I can send HTML messages to the list and also have footers enabled. How do I enable that function for my Mailman server? On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Mark Sap

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Added to All Messages I Send

Edwin Shao wrote: > >Sorry if this has been asked before. I just spent 4 hours browsing the >archive and FAQs and couldn't resolve my question. Every time I send a mail >to my list, it appears like this: > >* > >*-Inline Attachment Follows- > >___

[Mailman-Users] Attachments Added to All Messages I Send

Dear all, Sorry if this has been asked before. I just spent 4 hours browsing the archive and FAQs and couldn't resolve my question. Every time I send a mail to my list, it appears like this: * *-Inline Attachment Follows- ___ Test-test mailing

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

I promised I would report back on this issue, and can now confirm that with the filtering settings suggested by Mark, the posts from "office man" and those from "excite man" both get delivered by Mailman correctly, although some MUAs have problems visualizing those from "office man". Therefore, th

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments

Con Wieland wrote: > >On Apr 15, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> If you want to accept any text/plain parts from the message or an >> attached (forwarded as attachment) message and likewise for PDFs and >> not accept anything else, set filter_mime_types empty and >> pass_mime_types to >>

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments

On Apr 15, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Con Wieland wrote: >> >> On Apr 15, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >>> Con Wieland wrote: >>> My questions are, why am I getting the html attachments? >>> >>> >>> Because the sender's MUA is sending them and your content >>> filte

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments

Con Wieland wrote: > >On Apr 15, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Con Wieland wrote: >> >>> My questions are, why am I getting the html attachments? >> >> >> Because the sender's MUA is sending them and your content filtering is >> either not on or is not removing HTML and not collapsing

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments

On Apr 15, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Con Wieland wrote: > >> I am having trouble understanding what is going on with the >> attachments and archives. I have a message being sent to the list >> that appears to be text with a pdf attachment. With Mac mail I >> receive it as expected sh

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments

Con Wieland wrote: >I am having trouble understanding what is going on with the >attachments and archives. I have a message being sent to the list >that appears to be text with a pdf attachment. With Mac mail I >receive it as expected showing both the text and the attachment. When >I go to

[Mailman-Users] attachments

I am having trouble understanding what is going on with the attachments and archives. I have a message being sent to the list that appears to be text with a pdf attachment. With Mac mail I receive it as expected showing both the text and the attachment. When I go to the archives though I ge

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

Sciamano wrote: > >If this may help: to my MUA, the Excite user messages appear as >multipart/mixed, with multipart/alternative content and Plain Text >Documents. For this message, pass_mime_types with 'multipart', 'message/rfc822' and 'text/plain' only will deliver a message to the list which is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

On 4/12/08, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Won't this make all > >messages from the Excite user be rejected? > > Not if there is any text/plain part in the message. If the Excite > user's message is multipart/alternative with text/plain and text/html > alternative parts and then a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

Sciamano wrote: >On 4/12/08, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The above will remove everything which is not a text/plain part from >> the delivered messages. > >That's what I'm worried about, considering the fact that Excite >appends HTML automatically to outgoing messages. Won't this

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

On 4/12/08, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This seems like a problem with the MUAs (mail clients) reading the > message rather than the message. That might be the issue, since I can read the messages correctly using KMail. > Set your content filtering as follows to do what you say you

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

Sciamano wrote: > >Basically, I don't want any attachments except for text files, nor any >HTML messages sent to the list. > >The list seems to work fine for most of the subscribers, except for >two of them, whose messages are creating problems: one who uses his >office email account and whose serv

[Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

Hello, I'm using Mailman to manage a mailing list, which was previously hosted on yahoogroups. I like it so far, but I'm encountering what I think is a filtering problem. Basically, I don't want any attachments except for text files, nor any HTML messages sent to the list. The list seems to work

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments that will not open.

Garrett L. Hudson wrote: >I am receiving "Uncaught bounce notifications" with an attachment that can >not be opened. I am assuming this is the original unrecognized bounce but I >can not verify. Any chance anyone has seen this before? Yes. The actual message which cannot be parsed as a bounce

[Mailman-Users] Attachments that will not open.

I am receiving "Uncaught bounce notifications" with an attachment that can not be opened. I am assuming this is the original unrecognized bounce but I can not verify. Any chance anyone has seen this before? Thanks, Gary -- Mailman-Users ma

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

Liss sent the message below at 10:01 1/16/2008: >Okay, but when I send a message to THIS list (which is also mailman) using >html and Outlook, it doesn't create this issue & goes through the list >without the attachment. > >Why does it work with Mailman user list but not my own? > >Thanks for the l

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

> It happens when I send any html mail - I have tried every setting I > can think of to shut it off... Just delete any list info from non-digest options page., OMG, THANK You!!! It worked Great, thank you SO Very Much. ~Liss -- Mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

Hello 2008/1/16, Liss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing > > The only info in the list attachment is the list info itself: > > -- > news Weekly Newsletter

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

Subject: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing The only info in the list attachment is the list info itself: -- news Weekly Newsletter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.mydomain.com/mailman/listinfo/mylist

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

Liss wrote: > I've finally got my mailing list up and running, but no matter what I do, >every single msg comes with a .txt attachment. I cant figure out how to shut >it off! > >Any ideas? > End original message. - Here is your problem: "X-Mailer: Microsoft O

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

On 1/16/08, Liss wrote: > I've finally got my mailing list up and running, but no matter what I do, > every single msg comes with a .txt attachment. I cant figure out how to shut > it off! Search the FAQ Wizard for "footer". -- Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> LinkedIn Profile:

[Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

I've finally got my mailing list up and running, but no matter what I do, every single msg comes with a .txt attachment. I cant figure out how to shut it off! Any ideas? Thanks, Liss -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every message

On 12/30/07, Sarah wrote: > Hello. I run a mail man list and almost every message has an attachment on > it. Now there is no attachment when you look at the message but it appears > to be the footer of the message that is invisible to OE and I notice that > in thearchvies it says x attachments

[Mailman-Users] attachments in every message

Hello. I run a mail man list and almost every message has an attachment on it. Now there is no attachment when you look at the message but it appears to be the footer of the message that is invisible to OE and I notice that in thearchvies it says x attachments were scrubbed. Why is this. I notic

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

--- Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Your site use Mailman-2.1.5 which is way too old. > Upgrade to the > current version (2.1.9) and try again. > > -- > Tokio Kikuchi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/ > ok that was it. Mailman 2.1.9 solves this problem. My

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

Hi, > Here is a URL where I created a list for testing > mailman. > > https://mail.bioacademy.gr/pipermail/testlist2/2007-May/thread.html Your site use Mailman-2.1.5 which is way too old. Upgrade to the current version (2.1.9) and try again. -- Tokio Kikuchi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://weather

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

Mailman developers: I've submitted a bug on the SF tracker (what, no Jira yet?) #1712034. What I write below is all I've got for now, and it's on the tracker; bug/patch traffic will followup to the tracker. Reply-To set to mailman-users. John Papapanos writes: > Here is a URL where I created a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

> What do you mean by "scrambled"? Can you give a URL > where we can > observe this? What web browser do you use? How is > it configured for > viewing non-ASCII/ISO-8859-1 encodings? > Here is a URL where I created a list for testing mailman. https://mail.bioacademy.gr/pipermail/testlist2/200

[Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

John Papapanos writes: > Is there a solution to the broken link ? This is not a "problem" that can be "solved". Mailman (or some other mail program) here is conforming to the recommendation in the standards that lines in mail bodies be broken at a reasonable length. Since this behavior is recom

[Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

Hi list, I have 2 different problems with attachments in archives in mailman lists. 1. The first problem has to do with attachment URLs in the web archive. The URL is split into two lines where the first line ends with a '='. If you concatenate the two lines and omit the '=' the URL works fine.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Typ x-zip-compressed being converted tobin

Michael Barnard wrote: > >We are using Mailman 2.1.5 on RaQ550 Kernel 2.4.19C12_V-1. > >When we mail the list with an attached zip file the extension is changed to >bin in the list archive. >The list members receive a zip file with the correct extension. In Mailman 2.1.5, if the attachment has a

[Mailman-Users] Attachments Typ x-zip-compressed being converted to bin

Hi All We are using Mailman 2.1.5 on RaQ550 Kernel 2.4.19C12_V-1. When we mail the list with an attached zip file the extension is changed to bin in the list archive. The list members receive a zip file with the correct extension. Is there a fix for this. Thanks in advance Michael Barnard [

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments created by Mailman?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Everything now works fine, except -- when I send an HTML email, >Mailman seems to duplicate my images (which I have NOT included as >attachments--they're hosted on the Web) and send them along as >attachments. I'm afraid that my subscribers won't even want to ope

[Mailman-Users] attachments created by Mailman?

I would be ever so grateful if someone can help me with this. I've spent many hours -- days, actually -- setting up a one-way newsletter. Everything now works fine, except -- when I send an HTML email, Mailman seems to duplicate my images (which I have NOT included as attachments--they're h

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments are not scrubbed

Hello, > messages sent to non-digest subscribers. If this was the case in your > 2.1.4, you must have had a local patch to do it which was 'removed' > when you upgraded to 2.1.5. Hm, I don't remember exactly the version of mailman but it really worked 'out of box'. > if not GLOBAL_PIPELINE.coun

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments are not scrubbed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >No. Previous version was 2.1.4. And new version (2.1.5) I installed via deb >(Debian package). In 2.1.4 attachments were scrubbed in simple non-digest >format (there was one bug with encoding). Just to be sure I understand, you are saying that attachments were scrubbed

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments are not scrubbed

Hello, > In Mailman 2.1.6, there is an option to scrub attachments from > individual messages (non-digest emails). Prior to that, attachments > were only scrubbed from archives and plain text format digests. Are > you sure you didn't downgrade to 2.1.5? No. Previous version was 2.1.4. And new ver

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments are not scrubbed

Saulius wrote: > >yesterday I upgraded mailman to 2.1.5 version and noticed that >attachment no more were scrubbed (in non-digest emails) although in >previous version they were scrubbed. Is the a bug or where should I >'switch on' that attachments were srubbed automaticaly (i.e. attachment >wo

[Mailman-Users] attachments are not scrubbed

Hello, yesterday I upgraded mailman to 2.1.5 version and noticed that attachment no more were scrubbed (in non-digest emails) although in previous version they were scrubbed. Is the a bug or where should I 'switch on' that attachments were srubbed automaticaly (i.e. attachment would be in some

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in archives have wrong extensions

I am battling a somewhat related problem. I am trying to get mailman to save the attachment with the same file name as attachment. So, what is the syntax for SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION Is it True/False or 1/0 I am using mailman 2.1.6 Thanks Elvis On 9/16/05, Mark Sapiro <[EM

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in archives have wrong extensions

DW wrote: > >I searched Scrubber.py, and found some logic which said: > >"if mm_cfg.SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION" I should have pointed you directly at this, but I'm glad you found it anyway. My excuse is it's new in 2.1.6 and I was looking at a 2.1.5 base. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PR

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in archives have wrong extensions

Mark Sapiro wrote: > DW wrote: > >>When users send email to any of my lists with attachments, they go >>through fine. But when someone tries to go back and get an attachment > >>from one of the archives, they almost always find that the link to the > >>attachment has a bad extension, and the

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in archives have wrong extensions

DW wrote: > >When users send email to any of my lists with attachments, they go >through fine. But when someone tries to go back and get an attachment >from one of the archives, they almost always find that the link to the >attachment has a bad extension, and the web browser doesn't know what to

[Mailman-Users] attachments in archives have wrong extensions

Hello, When users send email to any of my lists with attachments, they go through fine. But when someone tries to go back and get an attachment from one of the archives, they almost always find that the link to the attachment has a bad extension, and the web browser doesn't know what to do wit

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Thanks so much for all of the help and information. I will try using MIME digests first. If things don't work for the subscribers, I can try Mark's code suggestion. ...eliz -- Children are made up of genetics, blind luck, and the stories you tell

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

At 8:03 PM -0600 2005-07-28, Elizabeth Lear wrote: > Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber > can be hacked out without breaking things, or is it too integral to > the code? I believe that omitting or hacking Scrubber.py is likely to lead to behaviour t

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > >Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >>>Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in >>>ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the >>>archiver. :-( >> >> >> Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber >> can be hac

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Hi, Elizabeth Lear wrote: >>Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in >>ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the >>archiver. :-( > > > Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber > can be hacked out without breaking th

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

> Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in > ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the > archiver. :-( Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber can be hacked out without breaking things, or is it too integral to the co

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Hi Mark, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >>Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through >>rather than trying to save them on the server? > > > You could remove Scrubber from the pipeline, Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in ToDi

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through >rather than trying to save them on the server? You could remove Scrubber from the pipeline, but I don't think you want to do that because I think the MIME structure of the message with attachments will

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Hmm, thanks. Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through rather than trying to save them on the server? ...eliz -- Children are made up of genetics, blind luck, and the stories you tell them. - The Flying Ks ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >A list on my site is not using content filtering, and has set digests >to plain mode. I've double-checked that all digest subscribers are >also set to plain mode. This is irrelevant to the following. Digest plain or mime only governs whether the individual messages in t

[Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Hi - My apologies if this has been covered or is something obvious, but I haven't been able to find a reference to it in the manuals and I've never run across this before. A list on my site is not using content filtering, and has set digests to plain mode. I've double-checked that all digest sub

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments in digest mode

At 1:20 PM -0400 2005-07-20, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm quite new to mailman (having just implemented it) and > have run into the following problem: when e-mail containing > an attachment is sent to my test list, those users not in > digest mode receive it, but it is scrubbed for those u

[Mailman-Users] Attachments in digest mode

Greetings, I'm quite new to mailman (having just implemented it) and have run into the following problem: when e-mail containing an attachment is sent to my test list, those users not in digest mode receive it, but it is scrubbed for those users in digest mode ("non-text attachment has been s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments

Fred Macondray wrote: > >I attempted to approve and send a message to my announce-only list that had >a .jpg attachment. > >The message went out, but without the original attachment. > >The message that came through had the subscription options footer as a .txt >attachment. > >How can I 1) configu

[Mailman-Users] Attachments

Greetings, I attempted to approve and send a message to my announce-only list that had a .jpg attachment. The message went out, but without the original attachment. The message that came through had the subscription options footer as a .txt attachment. How can I 1) configure mailman to send at

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments

Ram Dak wrote: >It is strange, but perhaps the first option under >'Content Filtering' should be set to 'Yes' rather than >'No'. If filter_content is set to "no", there should be no filtering of content and all MIME parts should be passed regardless of type. >I say strange because, as I mentione

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments

It is strange, but perhaps the first option under 'Content Filtering' should be set to 'Yes' rather than 'No'. I say strange because, as I mentioned in my previous mail, the attachemnts did not go through earlier although I had deleted all the content types, and I had set the first option to 'yes'

  1   2   >