[Mailman-Users] Re: illegal BOM

2022-02-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 2/4/22 11:01, Russell Clemings wrote: For cPanel, this looks relevant, assuming you have root privileges: https://forums.cpanel.net/threads/how-to-remove-x-ham-report-from-message-header.636153/post-2597865 That's for exim. For Postfix, there's /^X-Ham-Report:/ IGNORE in /etc/postfix/hea

[Mailman-Users] Re: illegal BOM

2022-02-04 Thread Russell Clemings
For cPanel, this looks relevant, assuming you have root privileges: https://forums.cpanel.net/threads/how-to-remove-x-ham-report-from-message-header.636153/post-2597865 It shouldn't be overwritten on a Mailman update, whereas I think hacking Cleanse.py would be. On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 4:17 AM St

[Mailman-Users] Re: illegal BOM

2022-02-04 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Executive summary: - There is a BOM in the X-Ham-Report header field. - There is reason to believe that it, and not just any non-ASCII, triggered this rejection. - Disabling the X-Ham-Report field (and possibly an X-Spam-Report field) seems to be the best option. Christian via Mailman-Users w

[Mailman-Users] Re: illegal BOM

2022-02-03 Thread dmitri maziuk
On 2022-02-03 4:47 PM, Christian via Mailman-Users wrote: Hello Mark Sapiro. On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 14:31:11 -0800, you wrote: ... This is the only header in the message that looks suspicious. I suspect the `?` characters are actually non-ascii characters in an unencoded header and that's the probl

[Mailman-Users] Re: illegal BOM

2022-02-03 Thread Christian via Mailman-Users
Hello Mark Sapiro. On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 14:31:11 -0800, you wrote: >>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system >>> "crift.digimouse.eu", has NOT identified this incoming email as >>> spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view >>> it or label similar fu

[Mailman-Users] Re: illegal BOM

2022-02-03 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 2/3/22 13:16, Christian via Mailman-Users wrote: Hello Mark Sapiro. On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:28:00 -0800, you wrote: Can you post the headers of the message as sent from the list? Of course. Here it is: ... X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "crift.digimouse.eu",

[Mailman-Users] Re: illegal BOM

2022-02-03 Thread Christian via Mailman-Users
Hello Mark Sapiro. On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:28:00 -0800, you wrote: > On 2/3/22 09:24, Christian via Mailman-Users wrote: >> Hello Carl Zwanzig. On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:12:37 +, you wrote: >> From tine to time I get bounce messages (for several recipients, today 4 of a total of 165) wit

[Mailman-Users] Re: illegal BOM

2022-02-03 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 2/3/22 09:24, Christian via Mailman-Users wrote: Hello Carl Zwanzig. On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:12:37 +, you wrote: From tine to time I get bounce messages (for several recipients, today 4 of a total of 165) with the folloeing content: Are those coming from the same recipients? same hosts

[Mailman-Users] Re: illegal BOM

2022-02-03 Thread Christian via Mailman-Users
Hello Carl Zwanzig. On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:12:37 +, you wrote: >> From tine to time I get bounce messages (for several recipients, >> today 4 of a total of 165) with the folloeing content: > > Are those coming from the same recipients? same hosts? (same sender?) > Looking for any commonalit

[Mailman-Users] Re: illegal BOM

2022-02-03 Thread Carl Zwanzig
On 2/3/2022 5:58 AM, Christian via Mailman-Users wrote: From tine to time I get bounce messages (for several recipients, today 4 of a total of 165) with the folloeing content: Are those coming from the same recipients? same hosts? (same sender?) Looking for any commonality between failures.

[Mailman-Users] Re: Illegal BOM?

2021-09-03 Thread Richard Damon
On 9/3/21 5:51 PM, Christian Buser via Mailman-Users wrote: > Hi all > > I am using Mailman in a cPanel instalation - Mailman 2.1.33 on  cPanel > 98.0.6 - and occasionally receive an error message like the one below: > >   addr...@domain.ch >     host mx01.servicehoster.ch [194.191.24.200] >     SM