bruce clark writes:
My problem: the users on my lists are waging a low-level war with
their sig files. I do not allow commercial posting so they have
started creating sig files with their commercial messages inside them.
First, consider whether this is really so bad. I know I would be
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:24 AM, bruce clark brucecl...@icon.co.za wrote:
My problem: the users on my lists are waging a low-level war with their sig
files. I do not allow commercial posting so they have started creating sig
files with their commercial messages inside them.
You're not going
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Paul Tomblin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:24 AM, bruce clark brucecl...@icon.co.za wrote:
My problem: the users on my lists are waging a low-level war with their sig
files. I do not allow commercial posting so they have started creating sig
files with their
That was kinda my take on it, too.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: mailman-users-bounces+mcnutt=utk@python.org
[mailto:mailman-users-bounces+mcnutt=utk@python.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Sapiro
If I were you, I would moderate the offending users and simply reject their
posts until
Hi,
I've looked at the FAQ but because I put the 'new' in newbie, I don't
really understand the subtleties.
My problem: the users on my lists are waging a low-level war with
their sig files. I do not allow commercial posting so they have
started creating sig files with their commercial
bruce clark wrote
My problem: the users on my lists are waging a low-level war with
their sig files. I do not allow commercial posting so they have
started creating sig files with their commercial messages inside them.
This is creating a lot of 'heat' and wasting a huge amount of my time
Hello everybody,
On http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3844 (May 1st, 2000) I read the
following:
For example, there is a project contributor who has implemented a MIME
attachment scanner module which can be dropped into the pipeline. This
module can strip attachments from the message, post the
Thijs Braem wrote:
On http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3844 (May 1st, 2000) I read the
following:
For example, there is a project contributor who has implemented a MIME
attachment scanner module which can be dropped into the pipeline. This
module can strip attachments from the message, post
Thijs Braem wrote:
For example, there is a project contributor who has implemented a MIME
attachment scanner module which can be dropped into the pipeline. This
module can strip attachments from the message, post the attachments to
an external archive (either the file system or a WebDAV server)
Is there any way for members of a discussion list to ask Mailman to
'ignore' the rest of their post, similar to the 'end' command when sending
an email to the listname-request address? For example a member may have a
large footer signature automatically appended to their message when it
leaves
On 5/17/07, Rodti MacLeary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way for members of a discussion list to ask Mailman to
'ignore' the rest of their post, similar to the 'end' command when sending
an email to the listname-request address? For example a member may have a
large footer signature
On 5/17/07, Rodti MacLeary wrote:
Is there any way for members of a discussion list to ask Mailman to
'ignore' the rest of their post, similar to the 'end' command when sending
an email to the listname-request address? For example a member may have a
large footer signature automatically
We have a list set up with a 4000K size limit, and just the bad Microsoft
Extensions in the list
Of bad ones, not including the .DOC extension this user used.
Why would mailman strip the .DOC?
2.1.6 on FreeBSD from Ports.
Ideas? Help?
Here's the exim log of the input/output (with e-mail
At 3:12 AM -0400 2005-07-29, Larry Rosenman wrote:
We have a list set up with a 4000K size limit, and just the bad Microsoft
Extensions in the list
Of bad ones, not including the .DOC extension this user used.
Why would mailman strip the .DOC?
Depends on your content filtering
Larry Rosenman wrote:
We have a list set up with a 4000K size limit, and just the bad Microsoft
Extensions in the list
Of bad ones, not including the .DOC extension this user used.
Why would mailman strip the .DOC?
Content filtering does not strip based on filename extension. It strips
based on
Just to close this out, turning OFF content-filtering (we catch the bad
extensions in the MTA),
Fixed the issue. Moral of the story: be careful of BLANK content-type
entries
And enabling content-filtering.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1
Is there any sort of filter that can have mailman strip attachments, make them
available for http download, and put a little blurb in the email stating the
URL? I'm trying to prevent the same document from being stored in 5000
mailboxes as well as being virus and spam checked 5000 times
Hi,
What is your version of mailman? In mailman-2.1.6, there is a parameter
to achieve this in the nondigest section of admin interface as
`scrub_nondigest'. Set this `Yes'.
Cheers,
Michael Masse wrote:
Is there any sort of filter that can have mailman strip attachments, make
them
Hello
I am using Mailman version 2.1.4 on a Solaris 5.8 box using sendmail. I'm
using it to host interoffice lists to which users should not be given the
chance to subscribe/unsubscribe. That's all well and good, but when
someone posts to the list, mailman puts in a few unwanted headers:
On Wednesday, March 24, 2004 10:51 AM, Tim Faircloth wrote:
moderators), so I do not want the users to see these headers. Is
there a way to strip these headers out, or configure mailman to
leave out these headers?
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq04.001.htp
While not
Is there any way to automatically delete all the incoming received lines
from incoming messages ?
I've got a slew of moderators that are convinced that their
email addresses are being harvested because of the presence in the
received lines.
thanks.
Mike
Oops... forgot to ask with my last post: Is there a way to strip out all
attachments?
Brian
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ:
At 8:23 AM -0400 2003/08/26, Atkins, Brian wrote:
Oops... forgot to ask with my last post: Is there a way to strip out all
attachments?
See the archives. This is actually a more difficult problem than
you imagine, for a variety of technical reasons.
The short answer is that if you go into
Thanks, Brad. I guess I'll have to upgrade to 2.1 to get that feature.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:04 AM
To: Atkins, Brian
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Stripping attachments
At 8:23 AM
Use procmail as a preprocessor and the formail utility to strip out the
headers and replace them with more generic ones.
You could also write your own milter (something well worth doing - even
if just once)... milter = mail + filter
Jon Carnes
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 14:20, Devin wrote:
Myself
At 12:20 PM -0600 2003/07/07, Devin wrote:
It appears when you look at the header it still shows (envelope-from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]), Is there a way so it doesn't show the envelope-from
in the header?)
Nope. This information is put on the Received: headers by the
receiving MTA.
Because this
At 8:31 AM -0400 2003/07/08, Jon Carnes wrote:
Use procmail as a preprocessor and the formail utility to strip out the
headers and replace them with more generic ones.
That only works for the headers on input. This is a case of
headers being generated on output, and being placed there by the
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 11:26, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 8:31 AM -0400 2003/07/08, Jon Carnes wrote:
Use procmail as a preprocessor and the formail utility to strip out the
headers and replace them with more generic ones.
That only works for the headers on input. This is a case of
Myself and the other administrator that I've set up for this list have
decided to make it members only, and have those members posts be
anonymous. While I've found in the settings where to make the mail look
like it's just coming from the list admin rather then on behalf of...
the header still
Hello,
I have Mailman 2.1.1 running with sendmail an freebsd 4.7
I have recently ran into a problem with Mailman stripping all text codes
and making the post nothing but jumbled text without sentences. I do
not have Mailman converting HTML to Plain Text. Although I have tried
that as
I would suspect that your problem lays elsewhere. You might want to
capture the messages as they flying about in their queues and try to
isolate the process that is munging the messages.
Could it be a problem with differing character sets?
In any case, I haven't seen this reported as a problem
On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 15:27, David Gibbs wrote:
My personal recommendation ... upgrade to mailman 2.0.6 (at minimum,
probably best to go to 2.0.7) and apply Geoff Dairiki's demime patch.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=413752group_id=103atid=300103
Any of the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:49:44AM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 15:27, David Gibbs wrote:
My personal recommendation ... upgrade to mailman 2.0.6 (at minimum,
probably best to go to 2.0.7) and apply Geoff Dairiki's demime patch.
Does anyone know of some type of module, or frontend for MM that
functions similar to what the Listar (http://www.listar.org) program
does with attachments? Listar will strip any MIME content off of the
message and dump it to an URL accessible address and will then forward
the message on
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 19:35, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Does anyone know of some type of module, or frontend for MM that
functions similar to what the Listar (http://www.listar.org) program
does with attachments? Listar will strip any MIME content off of the
message and dump it to
yes, I know this is a frequently asked question and I know it's mostly
sendmail related.
I want to strip out HTML/attachments from incoming mail messages. I've
done some research and settled on using stripmime.pl until stripping out
mime stripping is incorporated into Mailman.
At 09:06 AM 11/22/2001, you wrote:
yes, I know this is a frequently asked question and I know it's mostly
sendmail related.
Not really sendmail related (IMHO).
I want to strip out HTML/attachments from incoming mail messages. I've
done some research and settled on using stripmime.pl until
-Users] stripping out HTML
At 09:06 AM 11/22/2001, you wrote:
yes, I know this is a frequently asked question and I know it's mostly
sendmail related.
Not really sendmail related (IMHO).
I want to strip out HTML/attachments from incoming mail messages. I've
done some research and settled
I run the Roatan Discussion List at:
http://list.linuxlabworks.com/mailman/listinfo/roatan
In the admin tool and documentation, I have been unable to find answers to
the following questions.
1. Is it possible to strip attachments from messages or not allow them?
2. Barring that, I see I can
.
0- Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Hasz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:22 PM
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Stripping Attachments, HTML, Message sizes
including attachments
I run the Roatan Discu
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Steve Hasz wrote:
1. Is it possible to strip attachments from messages or not allow them?
My filter at http://www.phred.org/~alex/stripmime.html does this. At
the bottom of the webpage are links to some other similar scripts.
2. Barring that, I see I can limit the size
41 matches
Mail list logo
