Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Terri Oda wrote: Geoff Shang wrote: I will review your patch, and I used list-domain.tld instead of This really needs to be documented somewhere. And by "somewhere" I recommend you put it into the Mailman Wiki, probably just add it to the FAQs: I'll do this. I probably

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

Geoff Shang wrote: I will review your patch, and I used list-domain.tld instead of list.domain.tld, but I basically came to the same conclusion and just implemented same. I got the idea from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2008-September/063254.html This really needs to be doc

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

Geoff Shang wrote: >On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> There is still a problem in that there is a potential list name >> conflict, so to resolve that, you need to make a patch (see attached > >ah... > >I will review your patch, and I used list-domain.tld instead of >list.domain.tld, but

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote: Geoff Shang wrote: On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: => /etc/mail/aliases/$domain-aliases mailman-lists.$domain \ "|/home/mailman/lists.$domain/mail/$domain-mailman post mailman" mailman-admin-lists.$domain:\

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

Geoff Shang wrote: >On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > >> I have a multi setup for mailman to host multiple domains. All my list >> domains are configured as 'lists.$domain', for example 'lists.yeehaw.net'. >> My mailman installations all go under /home/mailman/lists.$domain >> >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: Geoff Shang wrote: This would appear to be the sticking point. The aliases file doesn't generate fully-qualified Email addresses, only local parts. How do I ensure that a message to annou...@foo.com doesn't go to annou...@bar.org? [snip] I ha

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

Geoff Shang wrote: This would appear to be the sticking point. The aliases file doesn't generate fully-qualified Email addresses, only local parts. How do I ensure that a message to annou...@foo.com doesn't go to annou...@bar.org? This must be doable, because if it's not, then this defeats t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

Hi Mark, re multiple installs, On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote: The post at (linked from the FAQ at ) has good information. I don't thing there's anything bet

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote: I just applied the mailman-2.1.7-20060114-to-vhost.patch to the 2.1.12 base and it applied with only two rejects, both of which are easy to fix. Whether the patched code will actually work and meet your requirements, I can't say. I probably can't afford t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote: You seem to have done your homework well, and to have a good understanding of the issues. You can learn a lot in 5 hours of reading. :) I found http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/stuff/mailman-vhost/ which appears to contain the same patches that were at http

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

Geoff Shang wrote: > >Ok...This is tarting to sound doable. It also means I can get the most >important domains up quickly. Is there any documentation for doing this? >I need to have 7 lots of everything, right? > The post at

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

Geoff Shang wrote > >This stuff looks a bit old. It's patches against Mailman 2.1.7 and files >seem to date back to 2006. The docs talk about what's going to happen in >2008. > >Does this code patch against 2.1.12? Is there newer code than this or >should I get it from git? And is there any

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

Geoff Shang wrote: > >This is about all I know though. There seems to be much posted on the >subject. It seems it'll be in version 3, and people have asked for it to >be in version 2.2. I've seen mentions of multiple patches and multiple >versions ranging over the last 6 years or so. And the

[Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

Hello, Apologies for jumping onto the list and posting right away, I realise it's bad netiquette. I admin two servers for a large non-profit organisation. On Thursday, one of them died. At the time we were using a different mailing list manager, but had plans to gently migrate the dozens

[Mailman-Users] Virtual domain support

Hello, Apologies for jumping onto the list and posting right away, I realise it's bad netiquette. I admin two servers for a large non-profit organisation. On Thursday, one of them died. At the time we were using a different mailing list manager, but had plans to gently migrate the dozens

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual-domain support?

At 1/26/2006 10:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >The followup question (assuming the above answer...which may or may not be > >a fair assumption): will this architecture ever be changed to remove this > >limitation? > >Yes again. I think you'll see it in Mailman 3, but as I'm sure you well >know, I ca

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual-domain support?

Matt England wrote: > >So the question is: is there any move afoot to change Mailman to support >same list names across multiple domains? Yes. See . >Why can't Mailman index it's list names such that the domain name is >associated with the internal list name...

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual-domain support?

At 1/26/2006 09:43 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >There are some patches around. See >. >There is also a link to cPanel's patches at >. >But re

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual-domain support?

Matt England wrote: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ie, same list name, different >domains, different lists/reflectors) will not work for the same Mailman >server...or at least, so I'm told. You are correct, at least as far as the standard 2.1.x distribution is concerned. There are s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual-domain support?

Matt England wrote: > > sendmail. ** shudder ** Hey, no shudder here. I fully understand Sendmail, it works well and I sleep good at night. YMMV. > [... rest of stuff deleted, not sure why we are talking about an MTA > if it's a Mailman problem ...but yes, I know how to get my MTA to do > this

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual-domain support?

At 1/26/2006 09:09 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: >That depends on a few things. For starters, does your MTA support >[EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes. >If it does, then you will need to use the virtualization features of your >MTA to map each list to a unique local email account. Alrea

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual-domain support?

Matt England wrote: > At 1/26/2006 07:47 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: >> I run multiple lists with Mailman, been doing so since v1.1 (or was it >> 1.2?). Anyway, virtual domains work for me. What virtual domain >> problem do you have with recent MM versions? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual-domain support?

At 1/26/2006 07:47 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: >I run multiple lists with Mailman, been doing so since v1.1 (or was it >1.2?). Anyway, virtual domains work for me. What virtual domain problem >do you have with recent MM versions? [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ie, same list name, differ

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual-domain support?

Matt England wrote: > I've been away from the list for a while, and am curious: > > Will "virtual domains" support be included in Mailman 2.2...if they are not > already? > > By "virtual domain" support I mean the ability to support email lists from > multiple domains via one GNUMailman install

[Mailman-Users] Virtual-domain support?

I've been away from the list for a while, and am curious: Will "virtual domains" support be included in Mailman 2.2...if they are not already? By "virtual domain" support I mean the ability to support email lists from multiple domains via one GNUMailman installation on one server. I manage vi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual Domain Support

I've made various runs at this without much success. For some reason I have trouble making some of the scripts work correctly with the symbolic links; i.e., they just plain won't follow them. Since I'm using chroot for some of my system services, I tried using that as well, but cron goes around

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual Domain Support

At 02:26 PM 2/9/2001 -0800, Erik S.E. Walum wrote: >We've been anticipating the fabled virtual domain support in mailman 2.0 >for a long time, but alas, the only documentation on this appears to be >a hack (ref: README.EXIM). IS there any further documentation on mailman >2.0's added support for v

[Mailman-Users] Virtual Domain Support

We've been anticipating the fabled virtual domain support in mailman 2.0 for a long time, but alas, the only documentation on this appears to be a hack (ref: README.EXIM). IS there any further documentation on mailman 2.0's added support for virtualdomains, or was it simply a rewrite of the cronta