Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Lena
> From: Michael Wise > The account has probably already been killed. I doubt that. I quoted entire header and the one-line body, but: == Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:03:03 +0300 From: l...@lena.kiev.ua To: ab...@microsoft.com Subject:

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

2015-09-14 Thread Gil Bahat
Why don't we take this to the next level then and hide it behind a 1x1 pixel and triple the level of tier-1 scripted support, after making it available only via IVR with average 15 minutes wait? let's weed out the weak-willed, because what this industry definitely needs is more distrust and lack o

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Wise
As I said ... we are compelled. And we're working on that for Hotmail as well, but it's not gonna happen, "Tomorrow". Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -Original Message- From:

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Noel Butler
On 15/09/2015 05:34, Michael Wise wrote: We are compelled to deliver it; talk to the senders who wander around wondering what the heck happened to a message that they handed off to a given mailhost and it was never delivered. We've all been seeing that for over a decade with hotmail, we succ

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Noel Butler
On 15/09/2015 06:54, Franck Martin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Michael Peddemors > wrote: > >> Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from the >> servers called.. >> >> mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com [1] >> >> And over the

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Wise
Or people who are in a desperate hurry... Both of which intersect on the Ven Diagram of a great many Mail Admins. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -Original Message- From: mailo

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

2015-09-14 Thread Steve Atkins
> On Sep 14, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Michael Wise wrote: > > It’s on my bucket list…. OTOH, it's a reasonably effective method of filtering out people who refuse to read documentation. Cheers, Steve > > Aloha, > Michael. > -- > Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Ha

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Wise
It’s on my bucket list…. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? From: Gil Bahat [mailto:g...@magisto.com] Sent: Monday, September

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

2015-09-14 Thread Gil Bahat
That brings up a very good point: can anyone make this link at least mildly more prominent than a 'here' anchor in the middle of a large body of text under an unassuming header? Almost makes you feel unwanted. On Sep 15, 2015 12:16 AM, "Michael Wise" wrote: > If it has anything to do with Hotmai

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Wise
If it has anything to do with Hotmail, this is the wrong advice. If it’s specific to Hotmail or Outlook.com email addresses and such like… http://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Franck Martin
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Michael Peddemors wrote: > Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from > the servers called.. > > mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com > > And over the last week, those numbers substantially increased.. > > However, whi

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

2015-09-14 Thread Matthew Black
Are you a mail producer or a Microsoft Office365 / Exchange Online Protection customer? If so, call your normal support channels. If not, ask a few of your select customers to complain to Microsoft. I am one of those Microsoft customers that has experienced a number of so called “white hat” e-ma

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Wise
Heh. Would love to stop using the pipelined metaphor, but alas; I'm not in charge of the design, coding, or anything else... I just try to make sure that the spammy stuff is tagged as spam so y'all can look at it and decide for yourselves, easily. :) There are many, many other types of message

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Peddemors
On 15-09-14 12:16 PM, Michael Wise wrote: If you see this ... X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:SPM (Specifically, the "SFV:SPM") That means we thought it was spam, but due to the pipelined nature of our service, rather than drop it on the floor as some do, we were compelled to

[mailop] Gmail and PDF attachments.. Changes in policy?

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Peddemors
Just had a few reports that Gmail is blocking messages with PDF attachments.. 74.125.28.26 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 552-5.7.0 This message was blocked because its content presents a potential 552-5.7.0 security issue. Please visit 552-5.7.0 https://support.google.com/

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Wise
If you see this ... X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:SPM (Specifically, the "SFV:SPM") That means we thought it was spam, but due to the pipelined nature of our service, rather than drop it on the floor as some do, we were compelled to deliver it. The traffic came in via a TLS c

[mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Peddemors
Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from the servers called.. mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com And over the last week, those numbers substantially increased.. However, while caught by our filtering systems, you have to look at some simple obv

Re: [mailop] Delivery to btinternet.com / cpcloud.co.uk

2015-09-14 Thread Johann Klasek
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 01:05:28PM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:47:25AM -0700, Michael Peddemors wrote: > > While you are absolutely right that network operators and email > > server operators should be the place that the majority of the work > > is done (at the source),

[mailop] pobox.com contact?

2015-09-14 Thread Phil Pennock
Hey, Old story, shadow IT setup, email for a domain being handled by pobox, person who set it up has left, no authentication information stored in company password manager system. I'm trying to get back access so we can pay pobox money and get things running again. (Which is, understandably, som

Re: [mailop] Delivery to btinternet.com / cpcloud.co.uk

2015-09-14 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:47:25AM -0700, Michael Peddemors wrote: > While you are absolutely right that network operators and email > server operators should be the place that the majority of the work > is done (at the source), (egress filtering, blocking DUL traffic to > Port 25 et al), and simpl

Re: [mailop] msn/outlook blacklist advice

2015-09-14 Thread G. Miliotis
On 14/09/2015 06:44 μμ, Steve Atkins wrote: Microsoft has the whole new range blacklisted (Getting SC-001 errors for 136.243.92.253; 136.243.92.252; 136.243.92.216). I'm assuming those three IP addresses are for smarthosts > that send outbound mail for you and your customers. Only one is curr

Re: [mailop] msn/outlook blacklist advice

2015-09-14 Thread Steve Atkins
> On Sep 14, 2015, at 8:11 AM, G. Miliotis wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > We've just moved someof our MXs to a new IP and it turns out we didn't plan > this very well. > > Microsoft has the whole new range blacklisted (Getting SC-001 errors for > 136.243.92.253; 136.243.92.252; 136.243.92.21

[mailop] msn/outlook blacklist advice

2015-09-14 Thread G. Miliotis
Hello everyone, We've just moved someof our MXs to a new IP and it turns out we didn't plan this very well. Microsoft has the whole new range blacklisted (Getting SC-001 errors for 136.243.92.253; 136.243.92.252; 136.243.92.216). The troubleshooting form provides no real feedback and I coul

Re: [mailop] Delivery to btinternet.com / cpcloud.co.uk

2015-09-14 Thread Ian Eiloart
> On 10 Sep 2015, at 08:23, Brandon Long wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Robert Mueller wrote: > >> We don't recommend doing that: >> >> https://support.google.com/mail/answer/175365 >> >> If you are forwarding mail, you'll inevitably forward spam, and you don't >> want your r

Re: [mailop] Delivery to btinternet.com / cpcloud.co.uk

2015-09-14 Thread Ian Eiloart
> On 10 Sep 2015, at 12:45, Robert Mueller wrote: > >> >> Ok, just to confirm, does this mean you don't recommend or recognise SRS >> rewritten MAIL FROM addresses as special in any way? >> >> Does anyone understand SRS? I thought it was pretty much a dead end. > > IMHO everything about