I've been getting an increasing amount of spam to various of my
addresses some of which have not been been actively used for some time.
The amount of spam received is kicking upward fairly rapidly.
All of this spam is sent by a third-party, not the company whose primary
domain appears in the "
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
>
> I've been getting an increasing amount of spam to various of my addresses
> some of which have not been been actively used for some time. The amount of
> spam received is kicking upward fairly rapidly.
>
> All of this spam is sent by a t
On 10/15/15 11:31 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
There's no way to tell just from that policy. If I put up a web page with a pr@
address and state that I'm interested in press releases in a given field then
(arguably relevant) press releases sent to that address are not unsolicited.
It's a reasonabl
On 10/15/15 12:15 PM, Brandon Long wrote:
What are you asking?
Spam is obviously in the eye of the beholder, if you think it's spam, it is.
Are you trying to convince others that this ESP is spammy?
Not necessarily. I'm asking the question as to whether their definition
of "solicited" holds
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
>
> Well, I have received *nothing* from this mailer-for-hire (IMHO far more of a
> spammer than an ESP) that I've asked for, nor anything from anyone with whom
> I've done business. The amount of spam is on the rise on behalf of numerous
>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Jay Hennigan
wrote:
> I've been getting an increasing amount of spam to various of my addresses
> some of which have not been been actively used for some time. The amount of
> spam received is kicking upward fairly rapidly.
>
> All of this spam is sent by a third-
