Hi Michelle
> Have a similar (though substantially smaller numbers) with Apple
> iCloud accounts... main problem there is people sending receipts for
> their purchases... you'd think they (the consumers) might be worried
> about a third-party getting all their (valid) credit card details,
> but I
>And they WANT to be able to choose whether to get spam mails tagged and
>have them delivered to their account where they can process them with
>their own filter rules and maybe report them.
Then you should deliver them to local mailboxes from which they pull
the messages using POP or IMAP. Any s
> On Aug 15, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Robert Mueller wrote:
>
>> We're definitely seeing dkim replay attacks and of course doing our best to
>> catch them.
>>
>
> Out of curiosity, one thing I thought might be a strong sign of a replay
> attack is lots of emails with the same b= value in the DKIM-S
> We're definitely seeing dkim replay attacks and of course doing our
> best to catch them.
Out of curiosity, one thing I thought might be a strong sign of a replay
attack is lots of emails with the same b= value in the DKIM-Signature.
Obviously mass mailings might trigger this as well, but I'm w
Franck Martin wrote:
Thanks,
As with Apple, they used to remember your email address associated
with your credit card, now, likely due to privacy/security concerns,
when you want the receipt to be emailed to you, you need to type your
email address each time. Now, many people do not know thei
Thanks,
As with Apple, they used to remember your email address associated with
your credit card, now, likely due to privacy/security concerns, when you
want the receipt to be emailed to you, you need to type your email address
each time. Now, many people do not know their email address especially
Thoughts and suggestions people...
I have about 2500 facebook and twitter accounts (current count) hitting
my server on a daily basis Neither Facebook nor Twitter seem to
stop sending to them even with 550 User Unknown messages at SMTP time
everytime they send... anyone know how to get th
I'm attempting to use Gmail's feedback loop and have run into some
issues that I was hoping to get some input on. I suspect that the issues
are related to using different domains for SPF and DKIM authentication.
The first issue is that both the "Spam Rate", and "Feedback Loop Spam
Rate" are sh
The percentage of mail that's authenticated is rather high, the percentage
that aligns, not as much. Unaligned mail is still called out in other ways
(Brandon Long via Authenticated Domain).
Brandon
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:57 AM, David Hofstee wrote:
> Gmail now requires SPF or DKIM: http
On 15 Aug 2016, at 12:17, Tim Starr wrote:
I see your point, but why is it so bad to rewrite content links? I am
assuming a unique link per mailbox.
Change any content of a message and you invalidate any cryptographic
signatures.
Rewrite links to go through your machines and you're effectiv
People assume click tracking, at the least.
It's not clear that it would help, anyways, the point of these attacks is
use them against another service, you might get some feedback but probably
not fast enough to matter, just like the per user dkim selector.
Brandon
On Aug 15, 2016 9:22 AM, "Tim
Replied offlist.
Udeme
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Torsten Reinert via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> We are trying to set up a new FBL with Microsoft via the JMRP but are
> unable to add IPs to the feed. The feed basically is created w/o IPs and
> new IPs cannot be added. Anyone else
I see your point, but why is it so bad to rewrite content links? I am
assuming a unique link per mailbox.
-Tim
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Bill Cole <
mailop-20160...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
> On 12 Aug 2016, at 19:12, Tim Starr wrote:
>
> The only benefit I can see from sending the
> On Aug 15, 2016, at 8:39 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
>
>
> On 8/15/16 5:30 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>>> On Aug 14, 2016, at 10:11 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/14/16 6:46 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
If there were a protocol that said "if you receive mail signed by
Hi Steve,
On 8/15/16 5:30 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>> On Aug 14, 2016, at 10:11 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/14/16 6:46 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>>> If there were a protocol that said "if you receive mail signed by this
>>> domain / this key and the recipient isn't in the To: or Cc: fie
> On Aug 14, 2016, at 10:11 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/14/16 6:46 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>> If there were a protocol that said "if you receive mail signed by this
>> domain / this key and the recipient isn't in the To: or Cc: field,
>> block it", or some similar protocol that signed t
Gmail now requires SPF or DKIM:
http://googleappsupdates.blogspot.nl/2016/08/making-email-safer-with-new-security-warnings-in-gmail.html
Not sure why it it calls it authenticated when it is not aligned with the
'From'-domain (like DMARC does). Technically it is, but not by the sender
itself.
Hi Seth
> Terminal: (host 167.89.88.20
> 20.88.89.167.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
> o1.webmaillist.flowerdeliveryexpress.com.)
20.88.89.167.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
o1.webmaillist.flowerdeliveryexpress.com.
$ dig -t any o1.webmaillist.flowerdeliveryexpress.com.
;; ANSWER SECTION:
o
18 matches
Mail list logo
