CAN SPAM basically says that receivers are not obligated to deliver mail that
complies with the law.
It’s, IMO, a badly written, poorly argued lawsuit that sounds more like
something I’d read on NANAE by someone with only passing familiarity with the
law or how the courts work. I blogged about
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:42:07 -0700, Brandon Long via mailop
wrote:
>No comments from this side, obviously... except that everything old is new
>again:
>
>https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+campaign+email+gmail+spam
We've had a fair bit of success reverse-engineering Google's placement
algorit
> Also, doesn't CAN-SPAM only apply to senders?
No, there is a little-known (apparently) clause in CAN-SPAM that specifically
states that ISPs can make any delivery decision that they want to, for any
reason or no reason whatsoever. It’s nearly (but not quite) the codification of
“their server
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 15:14:25 -0600, "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop"
wrote:
>
>> Also, doesn't CAN-SPAM only apply to senders?
>
>No, there is a little-known (apparently) clause in CAN-SPAM that specifically
>states that ISPs can make any delivery decision that they want to, for any
>reason
