Re: [mailop] Abusix Potentially Compromised Account Report

2020-04-02 Thread Blake Hudson via mailop
On 3/24/2020 11:19 AM, Steve Freegard via mailop wrote: Hi Micah, On 24/03/2020 16:10, micah anderson wrote: FWIW, we got a couple of these Abusix reports, checked them out and determined they were all false positives. Every single one of them was either an account that hasn't existed for

[mailop] Trend Micro Contact

2020-04-02 Thread Jessica Kaplan via mailop
Hi all, I am looking for a Trend Micro contact, if possible, to contact me off-list to help me better understand the cause of a malware link warning for a link not hosting malware. Thanks for any insight or guidance possible! *Jessica Kaplan*Senior Email Abuse & Compliance Analyst [image:

Re: [mailop] ADMIN: Mailop in 2020

2020-04-02 Thread Graeme Fowler via mailop
Hi all Just a quick update: we haven’t forgotten about mailop and moving the list, but we *have* all been caught up in the maelstrom of work caused by the Coronavirus pandemic - to give one perspective, at work we took a University of 18000+ taught students and sevral thousand teaching,

Re: [mailop] anti-abuse policy in RIPE

2020-04-02 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via mailop
Hi Suresh, Consensus is a difficult thing. If you don’t retry to find a minimum acceptable for everyone, we will never reach it, right? In LACNIC it took 6 versions across 3 years. I think it shows that we can do it! Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 2/4/20 15:31, "Suresh

Re: [mailop] anti-abuse policy in RIPE

2020-04-02 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop
Is there any point to it Jordi? The “we are not the internet police” crowd will make the same loud noises again and the initiative will be scuttled yet again. Why is continuing to bang one’s head against intransigence a good idea? From: mailop Date: Thursday, 2 April 2020 at 6:53 PM To:

[mailop] anti-abuse policy in RIPE

2020-04-02 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via mailop
(it will be good if someone not using DMARC can forward again this email back to the list, otherwise, many subscribers will not be able to see it - thanks!) Hi all, I'm new in the list (just a couple of days ago), but I think this is an important topic for this list ... so here is it. I'm

Re: [mailop] scaleway.com / online.net: Scammers, or just scammer friendly?

2020-04-02 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via mailop
Hi, I've got the same issues with online, and similar ones with OVH and cloudstar.is (now seems to be xemu.eu). I don't think any of the cases has got ever resolved, so some time ago, I started filtering them for some weeks. I reset the filters periodically and reissue them if I start getting

Re: [mailop] scaleway.com / online.net: Scammers, or just scammer friendly?

2020-04-02 Thread Ken O'Driscoll via mailop
On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 12:34 +0200, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via mailop wrote: > Anyone know something about these scaleway.com morons? Should > onefirewall their entire network ranges out completely, or just make > sureone doesn't accept any SMTP connections from those ranges? This is probably a

[mailop] scaleway.com / online.net: Scammers, or just scammer friendly?

2020-04-02 Thread Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via mailop
I've been receiving a lot of spam lately from IP addresses within the networks belonging to this organization; enough that I decided to send some abuse complaints their way. I usually don't bother, but they have a customer who pumps out large numbers of copies of the same two emails; one is for