Re: [mailop] DKIM: ed22519 experiences anyone?

2021-02-15 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter via mailop
Hey Vsevolod! * Vsevolod Stakhov via mailop : > On 15/02/2021 21:02, John Levine via mailop wrote: > > In article <20210215085929.76srgtpbaqbms...@sys4.de> you write: > >> Greetings, > >> > >> is anyone using ed22519 for DKIM signatures yet and what do you see? Any > >> interop problems? > > > >

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Bill Cole via mailop
On 15 Feb 2021, at 16:02, Simon Arlott via mailop wrote: Note: it is not really good enough to just filter the responses and ignore the problem. Invalid responses need to be logged for further action, either to fix the resolver or remove the lookup. A good point, although I would argue that th

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Noel Butler via mailop
On 16/02/2021 04:13, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2021-02-15 at 18:53 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote: Dnia 15.02.2021 o godz. 15:43:56 Matthew Stith via mailop pisze: Wanted to get this out to you all for awareness for anyone w

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Bill Cole via mailop
On 15 Feb 2021, at 13:43, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: Is it that requiring people to install a DNSBL-specific plugin earns Spamhaus something? I doubt that is a consideration. One of the chronic hard problems of DNSBL management is that users tend to 'set and forget' even when they'v

Re: [mailop] DKIM: ed22519 experiences anyone?

2021-02-15 Thread Vsevolod Stakhov via mailop
On 15/02/2021 21:02, John Levine via mailop wrote: > In article <20210215085929.76srgtpbaqbms...@sys4.de> you write: >> Greetings, >> >> is anyone using ed22519 for DKIM signatures yet and what do you see? Any >> interop problems? > > Aside from the fact that approximately nobody can validate them

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Simon Arlott via mailop
On 15/02/2021 18:25, Bill Cole via mailop wrote: > On 15 Feb 2021, at 12:53, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote: >> Dnia 15.02.2021 o godz. 15:43:56 Matthew Stith via mailop pisze: >>> 127.255.255.252 - Typing error in DNSBL Name >>> 127.255.255.254 - Query via public/open resolver/generic >>> unattri

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread John Levine via mailop
In article <463b0950-7b4e-d81d-7abc-0cf5120f6...@tana.it> you write: >> https://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/807/using-our-public-mirrors-check-your-return-codes-now >It would certainly have been less error-prone to return an appropriate >rcode[*], such as FORMERR/ >REFUSED, possibly followed by

Re: [mailop] DKIM: ed22519 experiences anyone?

2021-02-15 Thread John Levine via mailop
In article <20210215085929.76srgtpbaqbms...@sys4.de> you write: >Greetings, > >is anyone using ed22519 for DKIM signatures yet and what do you see? Any >interop problems? Aside from the fact that approximately nobody can validate them yet, they're fine. So long as you don't try to use the same s

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Mon 15/Feb/2021 16:43:56 +0100 Matthew Stith via mailop wrote: MailOP Folks, Wanted to get this out to you all for awareness for anyone who is using the Spamhaus public mirrors to query our DNSBLs. Beginning in March Spamhaus will start enforcing the follow error return codes for these news c

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Arne Jensen via mailop
Den 15-02-2021 kl. 18:53 skrev Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop: > Dnia 15.02.2021 o godz. 15:43:56 Matthew Stith via mailop pisze: >> Wanted to get this out to you all for awareness for anyone who is using >> the Spamhaus public mirrors to query our DNSBLs. Beginning in March >> Spamhaus will start enfor

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Bill Cole via mailop
On 15 Feb 2021, at 13:13, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote: Anyone can implement it in postfix. Just use: postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.[0..255]*3 If you are using a version so old that it doesn't support postscreen, then Wietse isn't your friend. Note that even fo

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Bill Cole via mailop
On 15 Feb 2021, at 12:53, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote: Dnia 15.02.2021 o godz. 15:43:56 Matthew Stith via mailop pisze: Wanted to get this out to you all for awareness for anyone who is using the Spamhaus public mirrors to query our DNSBLs. Beginning in March Spamhaus will start enforcing

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Jim Popovitch via mailop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2021-02-15 at 18:53 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote: > Dnia 15.02.2021 o godz. 15:43:56 Matthew Stith via mailop pisze: > > Wanted to get this out to you all for awareness for anyone who is using > > the Spamhaus public mirrors to query

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 15.02.2021 o godz. 15:43:56 Matthew Stith via mailop pisze: > > Wanted to get this out to you all for awareness for anyone who is using > the Spamhaus public mirrors to query our DNSBLs. Beginning in March > Spamhaus will start enforcing the follow error return codes for these > news codes an

[mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

2021-02-15 Thread Matthew Stith via mailop
MailOP Folks, Wanted to get this out to you all for awareness for anyone who is using the Spamhaus public mirrors to query our DNSBLs. Beginning in March Spamhaus will start enforcing the follow error return codes for these news codes announced in 2019: 127.255.255.252 - Typing error in DNSBL Nam

[mailop] DKIM: ed22519 experiences anyone?

2021-02-15 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter via mailop
Greetings, is anyone using ed22519 for DKIM signatures yet and what do you see? Any interop problems? TIA p@rick -- [*] sys4 AG https://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG,80333 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben