Re: [mailop] Filter out emoji from email adresses

On Wed, 6 Mar 2024, John Levine via mailop wrote: Right. I am aware of communities of EAI mail users in India and Thailand, but not anywhere else. You might expect EAI users in China, but nope, for reasons I can explain if anyone cares. Everywhere else people use ASCII mail addresses, even

Re: [mailop] Any Apple guys, with knowledge of their networks shed some light on this IP Space?

Michael never responded here, or in any personal email the last 3 months. So we took another approach and inform any web host out there to remove spamrats from their systems. We had issues with 4 web hosts until now, all 4 of them until now responded and removed this list from their systems.

Re: [mailop] Filter out emoji from email adresses

On 3/6/2024 10:13 AM, Bill Cole via mailop wrote: support for SMTPUTF8 *in MTAs operating as MXs* is not widespread enough to be useful except Email has a long history of very poor compliance, coupled with recipient demands that sender-side problems be dealt with using receiver-side

Re: [mailop] Filter out emoji from email adresses

It appears that Bill Cole via mailop said: >> AFAIK, for most of the world is US-ASCII not enough, not only for >> India or Thailand. > >Absolutely true. However, I believe that what John meant to point out is >that support for SMTPUTF8 *in MTAs operating as MXs* is not widespread >enough to

Re: [mailop] Filter out emoji from email adresses

Dňa 6. marca 2024 18:13:34 UTC používateľ Bill Cole via mailop napísal: >Absolutely true. However, I believe that what John meant to point out is that >support for SMTPUTF8 *in MTAs operating as MXs* is not widespread enough to be >useful except for mail to Indian and Thai addresses, because

Re: [mailop] Anyone from Microsoft?

> On Mar 5, 2024, at 11:36 PM, Michael Rathbun via mailop > wrote: > > You might wish to consider omphaloskepsis. The chances of a useful outcome > will be closely similar. I think that's a bit unfair. Omphaloskepsis can lead to, lint detection, which can be quite useful. Anne --- Anne

Re: [mailop] MTA-STS errors?

On 2024-03-06 at 13:35:10 UTC-0500 (Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:35:10 -0500) Michael W. Lucas via mailop is rumored to have said: On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 01:17:43PM -0500, Bill Cole via mailop wrote: Call me crazy, but if the policy changes on sub-day cadence, I don't think I want that email anyway.

[mailop] Postmaster/Support for tiscali.* domains

Anyone here from 'Tiscali' email? Can you please reach to me ? ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] MTA-STS errors?

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 01:17:43PM -0500, Bill Cole via mailop wrote: > > Call me crazy, but if the policy changes on sub-day cadence, I don't think I > want that email anyway. If you need me to re-check your policy twice a day, > it's not Policy. Short timeouts are good for initial tests, but

Re: [mailop] MTA-STS errors?

On 2024-03-06 at 12:44:18 UTC-0500 (Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:44:18 -0500) Michael W. Lucas via mailop is rumored to have said: On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:46:06PM +0100, Bernardo Reino via mailop wrote: On Wed, 6 Mar 2024, Michael W. Lucas via mailop wrote: ... Apparently "Google will only process

Re: [mailop] Filter out emoji from email adresses

On 2024-03-06 at 12:30:30 UTC-0500 (Wed, 06 Mar 2024 17:30:30 +) Slavko via mailop is rumored to have said: Dňa 6. marca 2024 15:52:47 UTC používateľ John Levine via mailop napísal: There's an extension called SMTPUTF8, informally known as EAI for Email Address Internationalization,

Re: [mailop] Anyone from Microsoft?

On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 8:18 AM Al Iverson wrote: > Mark, the path here is the normal contact channel for Microsoft OLC > issues - http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866 - and > requesting pre-emptive accommodation: > More on that here: > >

Re: [mailop] MTA-STS errors?

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:46:06PM +0100, Bernardo Reino via mailop wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2024, Michael W. Lucas via mailop wrote: ... > Apparently "Google will only process policies with a max_age higher than > 86000 seconds. Policies with a max_age of 86000 or lower will be ignored and > a

Re: [mailop] Filter out emoji from email adresses

Dňa 6. marca 2024 15:52:47 UTC používateľ John Levine via mailop napísal: >There's an extension called SMTPUTF8, informally known as EAI for >Email Address Internationalization, that in principle allows any UTF-8 >in addresses, but unless you are sending mail to people in India or >Thailand,

Re: [mailop] MTA-STS errors?

On Wed, 6 Mar 2024, Michael W. Lucas via mailop wrote: Hi, First time playing with MTA-STS. I have a test domain, ratoperatedvehicle.com. The mxtoolbox check says everything exists: https://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=mta-sts%3aratoperatedvehicle.com=toolpage My reports from Google

Re: [mailop] Filter out emoji from email adresses

On 04/03/2024 21:40, Sebastian Nielsen via mailop wrote: Im thinking to do same as I do when I filter emoji from subject lines, but this will also filter out umlaits from people’s names so “André Andersson” becomes “Andr Andersson” and “Recep Tayyip Erdoğan” would become “Recep Tayyip

[mailop] MTA-STS errors?

Hi, First time playing with MTA-STS. I have a test domain, ratoperatedvehicle.com. The mxtoolbox check says everything exists: https://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=mta-sts%3aratoperatedvehicle.com=toolpage My reports from Google say they can't find it, however. { "organization-name":

Re: [mailop] Anyone from Microsoft?

Mark, the path here is the normal contact channel for Microsoft OLC issues - http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866 - and requesting pre-emptive accommodation: More on that here: https://www.spamresource.com/2021/05/requesting-pre-emptive-accommodation.html That magic phrase tells them that

Re: [mailop] Filter out emoji from email adresses

It appears that Sebastian Nielsen via mailop said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Anyone that have a general algoritm to filter out emoji from sender >addresses? > >How I do in regexp to identify emoji? (its such a stupid thing).. Normal e-mail doesn't allow anything outside of ordinary ASCII in

Re: [mailop] [E] Anyone from Yahoo?

Tom and I emailed off list, thanks all!! *Lili Crowley* she/her Postmaster On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:23 PM Thomas Johnson via mailop wrote: > Hello everyone- > > We had an incident where a trusted connection from Microsoft had a nice > large dump of spam - it

Re: [mailop] Anyone from Yahoo?

On 2024-03-05 at 18:12:05 UTC-0500 (Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:12:05 -0400) Thomas Johnson via mailop is rumored to have said: Hello everyone- We had an incident where a trusted connection from Microsoft had a nice large dump of spam - it appears that several of their customers were compromised.

Re: [mailop] mimecast "antispoofing"

The "anti-spoofing" policies within Mimecast are configured on a customer by customer basis. These policies are a fairly blunt tool, and are set by default on new Mimecast accounts. They can apply to the "From:" header, the sender envelope address or both. The member should be able to take it