Re: [mailop] What is Yahoo TSS09 ?

2024-05-06 Thread Michael Rathbun via mailop
On 6 May 2024 23:47:20 -0400, John R Levine via mailop wrote: >> Any suggestions? > >To answer the obvious questions, it all has DKIM signatures and the SPF is >updated, so it ain't that. My suspicions point in the direction of a seldom-updated file of invalid routes, or some such.

Re: [mailop] What is Yahoo TSS09 ?

2024-05-06 Thread John R Levine via mailop
I am moving my servers to new IP addresses, which is always fun. The new block is 192.55.226/24 which was allocated in 1989 and has never been live until this week. So here's what AOL says to innocuous messagee from my users. 553 5.7.2 [TSS09] All messages from 192.55.226.66 will be permanently

[mailop] What is Yahoo TSS09 ?

2024-05-06 Thread John Levine via mailop
I am moving my servers to new IP addresses, which is always fun. The new block is 192.55.226/24 which was allocated in 1989 and has never been live until this week. So here's what AOL says to innocuous messagee from my users. 553 5.7.2 [TSS09] All messages from 192.55.226.66 will be permanently

Re: [mailop] Gmail + Spamhaus "technical values and unusual sending behaviors"

2024-05-06 Thread Gellner, Oliver via mailop
On 06.05.2024 at 19:22 K. M. Peterson via mailop wrote: The latest rejections, this morning, were from iCloud.com and indicated that the sending IP was on the Spamhaus BL list - with a link to query Spamhaus for more info. But the link returns that the IP "has no issues". Last week,

Re: [mailop] Gmail has a thing about dots

2024-05-06 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
The reason I added the address validation for mail from was because otherwise we had no guarantee that we could send a bounce. Validation stopped us from getting a bunch of invalid addresses we would then fail to bounce back to. The lack of handling for quoted addresses has been true since day

Re: [mailop] Gmail + Spamhaus "technical values and unusual sending behaviors"

2024-05-06 Thread Mark Milhollan via mailop
On Mon, 6 May 2024, K. M. Peterson wrote: I'm going to have to put together some sort of automated reporting of when I get blacklisted, I can recommend . /mark ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org

[mailop] Gmail + Spamhaus "technical values and unusual sending behaviors"

2024-05-06 Thread K. M. Peterson via mailop
Not sure if anyone has any ideas here: I've started to get mail rejected by various MTAs (outlook.com and icloud.com) from my personal server due to being listed at Spamhaus. The latest rejections, this morning, were from iCloud.com and indicated that the sending IP was on the Spamhaus BL list -

Re: [mailop] Doesn't ARC substitute DKIM at Gmail inbound?

2024-05-06 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 12:41 AM Alessandro Vesely via mailop < mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > The question is, since Gmail seems to require a DKIM signature just to > make > sure some domain is responsible for the message, doesn't an ARC seal cover > the > same requirement? > The most that ARC

Re: [mailop] Anyone from t-mobile?

2024-05-06 Thread Laura Atkins via mailop
yes. I’ve reported there. Repeatedly. I was looking for a contact that might be able to help. Laura Sent from my iPhone > On May 6, 2024, at 4:11 PM, Marco Moock via mailop wrote: > > Am 06.05.2024 um 15:56:31 Uhr schrieb Laura Atkins: > >> 205.183.255.162 > > Have a look in the whois

Re: [mailop] Anyone from t-mobile?

2024-05-06 Thread Marco Moock via mailop
Am 06.05.2024 um 15:56:31 Uhr schrieb Laura Atkins: > 205.183.255.162 Have a look in the whois database (whois in terminal): Comment:For abuse issues, please email ab...@aup.lumen.com Comment:All abuse reports MUST include: Comment:* src IP Comment:* dest IP

Re: [mailop] Anyone from t-mobile?

2024-05-06 Thread Laura Atkins via mailop
> On 6 May 2024, at 13:35, Marco Moock via mailop wrote: > > Am 06.05.2024 um 12:59:46 Uhr schrieb Laura Atkins via mailop: > >> Looking for an abuse contact there or at messagereach. > > T-Mobile is a name used by many (sub)companies. > Can you specify the IP address? > sorry, was cooking

Re: [mailop] Anyone from t-mobile?

2024-05-06 Thread Laura Atkins via mailop
T-Mobile for Business > On 6 May 2024, at 12:59, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote: > > Looking for an abuse contact there or at messagereach. > > laura > > -- > The Delivery Expert > > Laura Atkins > Word to the Wise > la...@wordtothewise.com > > Delivery hints and commentary:

Re: [mailop] Anyone from t-mobile?

2024-05-06 Thread Marco Moock via mailop
Am 06.05.2024 um 12:59:46 Uhr schrieb Laura Atkins via mailop: > Looking for an abuse contact there or at messagereach. T-Mobile is a name used by many (sub)companies. Can you specify the IP address? -- kind regards Marco Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1714993186mu...@cartoonies.org

[mailop] Anyone from t-mobile?

2024-05-06 Thread Laura Atkins via mailop
Looking for an abuse contact there or at messagereach. laura -- The Delivery Expert Laura Atkins Word to the Wise la...@wordtothewise.com Delivery hints and commentary: http://wordtothewise.com/blog ___ mailop mailing list

Re: [mailop] Doesn't ARC substitute DKIM at Gmail inbound?

2024-05-06 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Sun 05/May/2024 19:44:57 +0200 Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote: Andrew C Aitchison via mailop skrev den 2024-05-05 18:49: On Sat, 4 May 2024, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: The last URL in the response says something about ARC:    ARC checks the previous authentication status of