On 2024-06-13 08:28, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop wrote:
On Jun 12, 2024, at 11:40 PM, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
wrote:
Am 12.06.24 um 18:04 schrieb Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop:
I've also always found abuse@ to be responsive there, and it's peopled by a real person, who
On Thu 13/Jun/2024 11:14:04 +0200 Tobias Fiebig via mailop wrote:
What if spamd, while authenticating a malformed signature, notifies
the error in DMARC report? Would that "fix" spamd?
Would be somewhat pointless, though; From the top of my head I am not
sure whether there is a fitting
> On Jun 12, 2024, at 11:40 PM, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Am 12.06.24 um 18:04 schrieb Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop:
>>
>>
>> I've also always found abuse@ to be responsive there, and it's peopled by a
>> real person, who gives real responses (at least that was the
Moin,
> What if spamd, while authenticating a malformed signature, notifies
> the error in DMARC report? Would that "fix" spamd?
Would be somewhat pointless, though; From the top of my head I am not
sure whether there is a fitting field; And apart from that, I doubt
anyone would read those
