Re: [mailop] SendGrid Abuse unresponsive

://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8058 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8058>. Cheers, Alex > Am 05.05.2020 um 17:42 schrieb Andy Smith via mailop : > > Hi Alexander, > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:25:38PM +0200, Alexander Zeh via mailop wrote: >>> It would also be great if SendGrid wo

Re: [mailop] SendGrid Abuse unresponsive

Hello, > It would also be great if SendGrid would include an abuse reporting > URL in the headers of each message, specific to that message, i.e. > that passes along all info that SendGrid would need to identify that > campaign/client. I’m not so sure about that, having in mind that the list-unsu

Re: [mailop] contact to freenet.de mail admin here on the list ?

Hi, I get responses from postmas...@freenet.de . (Sometimes it takes a few days, depending on the amount of requests they get). Cheers, Alex > Am 04.05.2020 um 14:05 schrieb Kurt Jaeger via mailop : > > Hi! > > For a mailserver I'm operating we see rejections whe

Re: [mailop] authentication failures for messages from microsoft

Hi, I have a similar issue with confirmation mails from the Office 365 Delist Portal. When using an outlook-freemail address it’s going to the spam folder at least, where I can access it. Alex > Am 18.10.2019 um 07:56 schrieb Andreas Schulze via mailop : > > Am 11.10.19 um 15:27 schrieb Andre

Re: [mailop] Do we need Spam folders?

The thing is.. maybe technically savvy users don’t need spam folders. But having „normies“ in mind, like I’m thinking of my parents or friends who work in a totally different industry, I’m sure we need spam folders. Why? Because most people are kind of lazy. They don’t want to move spam away, ev

Re: [mailop] Gmail marking email from me as spam

My best guess from a receivers perspective is: If >99.9% of the traffic from a netblock were spam (let’s say from half of the IPs in that block), I don’t want to accept any more messages from the other IPs from the same netblock (and risk unhappy recipients and - even worse - financial impact be

[mailop] https://sender.office.com/ not working (or only with outlook.com addresses)

Hi all, I recently wanted to delist an IP using https://sender.office.com/ Unfortunately I never received the confirmation email from step 2. I heard from others that they received the email when using an address @outlook.com, I didn’t confirm that though. Do others

Re: [mailop] Resolving issues for several yahoo domains?

Same problem here. Seems to be a general problem: https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/yahoo.de > Am 05.09.2019 um 10:18 schrieb tobisworld--- via mailop : > > We're currently seeing several yahoo domains (ex yahoo.de) cannot be > resolved any more i

Re: [mailop] [ext] Re: Return Path / Sender Score

This might also be an issue of different wordings used in different parts of the world. I started working in the email space 10+ years ago for the eco Association in Germany. In every document, in every personal conversation I had, always the term DOI was used. Not only by marketeers, also by po

Re: [mailop] Any t-online.de admins here?

...@ostfalia.de> > Internet: www.ostfalia.de/rz > <http://www.ostfalia.de/rz>___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop -- Best regards Alexander Zeh Engineering Manager ---

Re: [mailop] Contact at Posteo.de

https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > <https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop> -- Best regards Alexander Zeh Engineering Manager --- eco - Association of the Internet Industry Certified Senders

Re: [mailop] About the Certified Senders Alliance

2.11.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Grant Taylor via mailop : > > On 11/02/2017 08:53 AM, Alexander Zeh wrote: >> I dare to disagree with your opinion that the sender is to blame. > > I don't think that the sender is responsible for what receivers do with > messages. > > I

Re: [mailop] About the Certified Senders Alliance

us to maintain the list. Thanks for that. :) Best Alexander > Am 02.11.2017 um 16:33 schrieb Felix Schwarz via mailop : > > > Am 02.11.2017 um 15:53 schrieb Alexander Zeh: >> Regarding our header: I'm sure you're talking about the X-CSA-Complaints >> header. O

Re: [mailop] About the Certified Senders Alliance

t;. But I don't see the "good" > or "exceptional" as part of your plan to make the deliverability landscape a > better place. Just some compromise by committee. And in practice, some say > your header is already a small spam indicator. The CSA see

Re: [mailop] About the Certified Senders Alliance

--=_Part_334583_459599753.150234563453456" > x-mid: 2369485 > X-CSA-Complaints: whitelist-complai...@eco.de > <mailto:whitelist-complai...@eco.de> > x-rpcampaign: sp2375598 > Feedback-ID: pod6_15062_2375598_891291414:pod6_15062:ibmsilverpop > x-job: 2375598 > x-orgId: 150

[mailop] About the Certified Senders Alliance

discussion either here, direct with me or for example on the next M3AAWG meeting in person. Best Alex -- Best regards Alexander Zeh Engineering Manager --- eco - Association of the Internet Industry Certified Senders Alliance Lichtstrasse 43h