by the click, not the view ?
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
I agree that forwarding and distribution lists are the most likely
reasons.
Another common possibility is what exim calls local_part_prefix and
local_part_suffix, often adding a "+" and a tag to the local part of
the address, but I imagine that your operators would recognise those.
I
rts
your defense falls apart.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
from google.
Your lawyers do not have to worry.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
It's clear that I'm NOT receiving Yahoo reports, I don't know why...
Are there special requirements to receive them?
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Andrew C Aitchison replied:
I recieve dmarc aggregate reports from Yahoo to the ruf address in my
_dmarc
receive them?
I recieve dmarc aggregate reports from Yahoo to the ruf address in my
_dmarc record; gmail sends forensic/failure reports to the rua address.
... Not exactly *special* requirements, but different, yes.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison C
collects. If
retrieving a message (without visiting any of the links) will trigger some
modification to the local safe-sender list, I would consider this a serious
bug at the very least.
Wont a simple text MUA like mutt or (al)pine retrieve a message
without visiting any of the links ?
--
Andrew C
and webmail -
where you do disable TLS 1.0, just in case a TLS version of DROWN
shows up.
Also, does the MTA check the name in the certificate ?
I understand that not all do (or didn't until recently)
since you can't always determine what the name should be.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison
tion
for companies as it does for individuals, so I don't see how it
can affect role email addresses and registered corporate adddresses;
those should be able to stay in WHOIS.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.m
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Lyle Giese wrote:
I am unable to get to onmicrosoft.com(hosted exchange), doing a dig
+trace onmicrosoft.com ends up:
onmicrosoft.com. 86400 IN NS ns4.bdm.microsoftonline.com.
onmicrosoft.com. 86400 IN NS ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com.
password every time, or do they store it ?
I really, really don't like the idea of encouraging users
to give passwords to third parties.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
your messages
several hundred K bytes.
If you trim some of the historical messages I suspect that your
messages will get through.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
you would
claim from your expert.
--
Andrew C Aitchison Cambridge, UK
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
an mine, but with ?any I am saying
that it definitely could be genuine.
I use forwarding and expect others to forward messages I send to their
users.
In the end I decided that SPF isn't really compatible with forwarding
and voted for a world with forwarding.
--
Andrew C Aitchison
__
as attachments rather than inlining them,
although options to switch between thse options would be helpful.
--
Andrew C Aitchison
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, Jim Cheetham wrote:
Hi Mailop,
We run our listening mail servers with a maximum header size limit of 32768
(Sendmail's default).
We've found at least one "legitimate" sender whose headers are far bigger than
that,
and the reason for this isn't a very long path :-) it's
y dislike looking at DMARC policy on mail that
doesn't already score as pretty spammy.
--
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
201 - 217 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
