Re: [mailop] !! Increase in outlook.com S3150 rejections

2024-02-20 Thread Lilium via mailop
Hello, we had similar issues, sometimes with IP addresses that have NOT been sending emails for months. Approx. one month ago we registered all the IP addresses with SNDS (Smart Network Data Service) *and* JMRP (Junk Mail Reporting Program). Paying great attention to each complaint. The

Re: [mailop] outlook.com 421 try again later S77719

2023-10-11 Thread Lilium via mailop
It appears to us that the delay only affects EU SMTP servers. US SMTP servers delivery is fine. Regards Andrea On 11/10/2023 11:12, Andreas via mailop wrote: Hello all, since a few hours we have problems with sending to Microsoft. We get hundreds of messages like in the subject with the

Re: [mailop] Sisimai for analysis of bounce reasons

2023-07-20 Thread Lilium via mailop
On 20/07/2023 03:50, H via mailop wrote: On July 18, 2023 1:33:20 PM EDT, Lilium via mailop wrote: This solution is based on Sisimai: https://realsender.com/for-email-broadcasters/bouncehandler-app/ It helped a few customers with deliverability issues due to wrong/inactive recipients

Re: [mailop] !! Sisimai for analysis of bounce reasons

2023-07-18 Thread Lilium via mailop
This solution is based on Sisimai: https://realsender.com/for-email-broadcasters/bouncehandler-app/ It helped a few customers with deliverability issues due to wrong/inactive recipients in their lists. The article "how to handle BOUNCED EMAILS" is a summary of our experience on this matter:

Re: [mailop] !! verifier.port25.com

2023-05-23 Thread Lilium via mailop
I manage this service to validate the SPF and DKIM settings: 1. send an e-mail to s...@tester.realsender.com 2. check online the validation results (it will take a minute to appear) https://tester.realsender.com/t/spf Regards Andrea On 23/05/2023 20:31, Blake Hudson via mailop wrote: Looks

Re: [mailop] Locally hosted anti-spam solution recommendations?

2021-10-22 Thread Lilium via mailop
Some of our customers use Libraesva: Libraesva ESG, Enterprise Email Protection, Cloud or On Premise. https://www.libraesva.com/ Regards Andrea On 20/10/2021 15:49, Otto J. Makela via mailop wrote: We're currently running Roaring Penguin CanIT as our mail frontend, and have been given an

[mailop] Contact from OVH

2021-04-29 Thread Lilium via mailop
Can someone from OVH please connect with me off list We are having an issue with some of your IPs on our SMTP service. Andrea Fava RealSender.com ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DKIM+DMARC at t-online.de (Deutsche Telekom's ISP branche)

2021-04-13 Thread Lilium via mailop
On 12/04/2021 22:08, Bob Proulx via mailop wrote: There are many questions about what will actually be implemented. It would be extremely useful if t-online.de provided an automated robot testing address to which email tests could be conducted. Being able to test this to an automated robot

Re: [mailop] openspf.org down

2019-05-15 Thread Lilium via mailop
Hello, this is a static version taken from web-archive: http://www.open-spf.org/ source: https://web.archive.org/web/20190225203208/http://www.openspf.org/ Regards Andrea ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org

Re: [mailop] Office 365 - Emails marked as not passing fraud detection

2017-11-28 Thread Lilium
I can’t figure this one out so looking for some help from people in the know. One of our clients has a postfix mail relay server used for relaying emails from photocopiers/internal software systems out to the world. Below I’ve pasted the headers of one. Office 365 / Outlook chucks them in

Re: [mailop] Microsoft Support Form

2017-08-23 Thread Lilium
I am attempting to put in a support ticket at https://support.live.com/eform.aspx?productKey=edfsmsbl3=eformts=wsignin1.0=1 but I keep getting a service unavailable message. Hello Brad, try using the alternative link suggested here:

Re: [mailop] dkim signature failures sendmail/opendkim

2017-05-27 Thread Lilium
Using sendmail with opendkim for signing mostly works, but I have a few domains with dmarc p=reject, and looking at the aggregate reports, I am seeing some dkim=fail, spf=pass on a small amount of mail going to google, comcast, etc. The aggregate reports show that mail is signed with the right