Re: [mailop] Cloud hosts for responsible mail servers?

You might add that it is also possibly due to your being in a webhosting provider / datacenter that proactively manages abuse so that extremely high volume spammers aren’t sending from any nearby IPs. From: mailop on behalf of Ralph Seichter via mailop Date: Tuesday, 9 July 2024 at 9:11 AM

Re: [mailop] Yahoo/AOL Blocking

Certainly seems to be - the error is quite clear. You might want to check the usual? Hacked script originating or proxying spam (sometimes not even through your mta), forwarding users onto yahoo and spam that misses your inbound filtering is being forwarded on? It’d save these periodic emails

Re: [mailop] how to stop this spam

Middle eastern and south Asian spammers have been running riot on that platform for over a decade now. Nobody seems to care. —srs From: mailop on behalf of Jeff Pang via mailop Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 7:43:01 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop]

Re: [mailop] Apple/iCloud message blocking

That is the postmaster address for icloud so yes. The team will respond. Please see https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204137 --srs From: mailop on behalf of Jeff P via mailop Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 12:08:37 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re:

Re: [mailop] Apple/iCloud message blocking

I will have the team check --srs From: mailop on behalf of Scott Mutter via mailop Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 11:02:03 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Apple/iCloud message blocking On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 10:43 PM Suresh Ramasubramanian

Re: [mailop] Apple/iCloud message blocking

What address did you send it from? We don’t seem to see any email from your address so can you please resend it. --srs From: mailop on behalf of Scott Mutter via mailop Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 8:41:14 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop]

Re: [mailop] TLS inbound to comcast.net

Yeah Benny – if you’re running 16 year old code and certificates that you’re still on TLS v1 or 1.1, it is time to upgrade, asap. What you have is not much better or worse than sending it en clair anyway. From: mailop on behalf of Serhii via mailop Date: Tuesday, 21 May 2024 at 6:39 PM To:

Re: [mailop] Google Mail rejects forwarded email despite `~all` in SPF

Why is that, when 90% ++ of the transactions are between a limited set of providers, and even after that, within the long tail, there will be a similar bell curve so that most of your regular recipients that use ARC will eventually trust you? Beyond that, converting authentication into “trust”

Re: [mailop] Debt Collection Client Email Servers

No email provider is going to investigate whether a spam complaint is “false” or “true” If the percentage of spam complaints, bounces etc gets high enough, good luck to your email campaign --srs From: mailop on behalf of Michael Irvine via mailop Sent:

Re: [mailop] Love how people use SPF records.. Just for a chuckle..

This looks more like they’ve been testing several providers and ended up with a large spf record that they might want to consider trimming. --srs From: mailop on behalf of Michael Peddemors via mailop Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 4:24:03 AM To:

Re: [mailop] Another very strange microsoft originated email??

Free trial account on Microsoft 365 being relayed through Microsoft 365 outbounds by a Hetzner IP --srs From: mailop on behalf of Michael Peddemors via mailop Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 5:38:33 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Another very

Re: [mailop] Apple/icloud blocking - Message rejected due to local policy

-09-21 11:51AM CDT. Subject of the message is - 209.236.124.55 IP Blacklisted I sent the message to icloudad...@apple.com<mailto:icloudad...@apple.com> and CC'd s...@apple.com<mailto:s...@apple.com> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 9:46 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian mailto:ops.li...@gmail.com&g

Re: [mailop] Apple/icloud blocking - Message rejected due to local policy

ct: Re: [mailop] Apple/icloud blocking - Message rejected due to local policy How long should I have to wait for a response? I haven't heard anything back and icloud is still rejecting the message due to local policy. On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 9:07 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian mailto:ops.li...@gmail.com&g

Re: [mailop] Apple/icloud blocking - Message rejected due to local policy

I’ll have someone look at your email and reply if they haven’t yet --srs From: mailop on behalf of Scott Mutter via mailop Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 9:11:02 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Apple/icloud blocking - Message rejected due to

Re: [mailop] CS02 errors from Apple on Japanese emails only

Hi. Please feel free to forward me any ticket responses you got from the postmaster team, glad to take a look --srs From: mailop on behalf of Christine Borgia via mailop Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 7:57:06 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] CS02

Re: [mailop] Microsoft Office365 not rejecting emails when instructed so by SPF recored?

Never mind – or ? and think of what happens to those poor domains that are saddled with a +all SPF record. From: mailop on behalf of Neil Jenkins via mailop Date: Friday, 26 May 2023 at 9:16 AM To: Mailop Group Subject: Re: [mailop] Microsoft Office365 not rejecting emails when instructed

Re: [mailop] linodeusercontent.com/googleusercontent.com, I'm so done with you

the announcement/notification/policy about it. And there are obviously plenty of perfectly fine reasons to burst a port that doesn't even bother anyone but yourself. On 2023-04-07 23:29, Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop wrote: > Why would you need to blanket block port 25 outbound when you could >

Re: [mailop] linodeusercontent.com/googleusercontent.com, I'm so done with you

Why would you need to blanket block port 25 outbound when you could rate limit and/or dynamically block it? Yes - abusers would then go and get a few hundred thousand accounts and send maybe 10 emails per vps or droplet or whatever the abused provider calls it. And this is just smtp based

Re: [mailop] [EXT] - Re: [EXT] - Re: [EXT] - Re: [EXT] - Re: New member, trying to bring our mail server inline.

To: Suresh Ramasubramanian ; 'Josh Daynard' Cc: mailop@mailop.org ; Alessandro Vesely Subject: Re: [EXT] - Re: [mailop] [EXT] - Re: [EXT] - Re: [EXT] - Re: New member, trying to bring our mail server inline. Unfortunetly that is not possible with the sophos box as it's the gateway, so it's

Re: [mailop] [EXT] - Re: [EXT] - Re: [EXT] - Re: New member, trying to bring our mail server inline.

As a rule you need to finish your antivirus / antispam etc BEFORE you sign the message, especially where this scanning is done by a separate appliance with its own mailserver that inserts headers. --srs From: mailop on behalf of Salvatore Jr Walter P via

Re: [mailop] Student trying to attend M3AAWG

You can contact M3AAWG and request a pass --srs From: mailop on behalf of Alex Liu via mailop Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2023 8:30:57 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Student trying to attend M3AAWG Hi Everyone, My name is Alex and I’m a student

Re: [mailop] Cyren

It has shut down and laid off all its employees I don’t know what poor soul is still using them to filter spam but it won’t work any longer --srs From: mailop on behalf of Benoit Panizzon via mailop Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 2:13:30 PM To: Carsten

Re: [mailop] Try to understand *.onmicrosoft.com

That is an office 365 free trial account. There is some massive abuse of these going on over a period of time. However there is also a ton of legitimate traffic. --srs From: mailop on behalf of MRob via mailop Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 5:17:09 AM To:

Re: [mailop] Apple contact for strange email

These hosts deliver newsletters and marketing content that Apple sends to email addresses that are Apple IDs. I will let the team in question know to fix their PTR for these hosts – thanks for the heads up --srs From: mailop on behalf of Alexander Huynh via mailop Date: Tuesday, 18 October

Re: [mailop] Proofpoint Mail Blocking

You can reach out to the iCloud postmaster team if you face any FP blocks related to this or any other filter used on iCloud mail. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204137 --srs From: mailop on behalf of Henrik Pang via mailop Date: Wednesday, 14 September 2022 at 4:36 PM To: Christopher

Re: [mailop] Removing a block from Spamhaus PBL

You can contact them and say the netblock has changed hands - and changed PTR as well hopefully --srs From: mailop on behalf of Simplelists - Andy Beverley via mailop Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 7:05:46 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop]

Re: [mailop] Trouble sending to sympatico.ca

Why is it deferred when you get a 554? Probably a spam block on your IP or domain name with that generic an error --srs From: mailop on behalf of John Gateley via mailop Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2022 7:06:31 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Trouble

Re: [mailop] Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322?

The thing about dkim is that you’re supposed to sign mail AFTER adding corporate disclaimers, fixing missing headers and what not. Go ahead and fix whatever missing header you can - it’s all good --srs From: mailop on behalf of Robert L Mathews via mailop

Re: [mailop] Question for Google -- how am I able to be added to google groups without opting in?

Spammers in the middle east and Pakistan seem to love doing this. I finally set my google settings to “don’t add me to any google group without my requesting to join it” and that solved the issue, at least from the POV of my not receiving it. They’re running riot all over googlegroups and

Re: [mailop] Interesting question from a team member, MX chaining, list-manage.com

Just as a catchall to get any bounces coming in? Mailchimp is where their abuse and other mailboxes are located. --srs From: mailop on behalf of Michael Peddemors via mailop Date: Thursday, 30 June 2022 at 2:05 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Interesting question from a team

Re: [mailop] Microsoft Announces Tenant Trusted ARC Seal

Mailing lists adapted to spf long back, what hasn’t is the good old .forward and its more modern cousins that ask you to set a forward in email preferences on various webmail sites. From: mailop on behalf of Laura Atkins via mailop Date: Monday, 20 June 2022 at 4:46 AM To: Dave Crocker Cc:

Re: [mailop] Spoofed Message Passing DMARC

The usual – X-OriginatorOrg: PatriciaFuchs59.onmicrosoft.com Farmed free trial accounts on office 365 being abused by affiliate spammers, generally with replayed dkim headers. Pretty high volume, ongoing for quite some time. From: mailop on behalf of

Re: [mailop] Help with identifying invalid email domains

Publicsuffix.org is a wonderful resource for the tlds But then the question of what a valid domain takes some interesting turns. Validate the mx and it is a parking domain whose mail traffic probably feeds a set of spamtraps? Or one of those trashmail type places that let you create an address

Re: [mailop] Anyone else seeing increase in iCloud rejections?

? Of course. Could be days before I hear back so I'd like to be able to report in the meantime if this is specific to us. Blocking a whole ESP is emergency level, but I can't even reroute these to deliver out of network. On 2022-04-30 17:53, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > I hope you followed that

Re: [mailop] Anyone else seeing increase in iCloud rejections?

I hope you followed that url and emailed, asking why this block occurred? --srs From: mailop on behalf of Jarland Donnell via mailop Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 3:40:44 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Anyone else seeing increase in iCloud rejections?

Re: [mailop] [E] Traffic patterns related to Russian-Ukranian conflict

How would you correlate it to Russia? --srs From: mailop on behalf of Luis E. Muñoz via mailop Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 7:41:37 PM To: mailop Cc: Luis E. Muñoz Subject: Re: [mailop] [E] Traffic patterns related to Russian-Ukranian conflict On 30 Mar

Re: [mailop] Who runs emailowl.com / dnsowl.com?

Namesilo it is https://www.namesilo.com/Support/Troubleshooting-Custom-Name-Servers --srs From: mailop on behalf of Benoît Panizzon via mailop Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2021 7:00:11 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Who runs emailowl.com /

Re: [mailop] google at spamhaus

It is an xbl listing and that usually catches bot spam traffic. So unless some botnet found a way to abuse farmed or infected gmail accounts .. probably an FP I’d totally get the point (but not appreciate it despite the spam levels) if it were an SBL --srs

Re: [mailop] Outlook for Mac email autofill

Do you have something that auto replies to spam? --srs From: mailop on behalf of John Lightfoot via mailop Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 3:49:22 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Outlook for Mac email autofill I don’t know if this is a bug or a

Re: [mailop] Reg. delivery issues at Yahoo ISP

You might want to look at any other customers from the same or nearby IP ranges that aren’t sending transactional email? --srs From: mailop on behalf of Vaibhav via mailop Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 10:02:52 PM To: mailop Subject: [mailop] Reg. delivery

Re: [mailop] What does "Abaca" mean?

A spam filtering startup founded by Steve Kirsch --srs From: mailop on behalf of Russell Clemings via mailop Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 6:20:59 AM To: mailop Subject: [mailop] What does "Abaca" mean? Here's a question that I don't think has been asked here

Re: [mailop] Reg. Virginmedia SMC Policy Violation bounce error

You might want to see which of your clients are causing this behaviour --srs From: mailop on behalf of Vaibhav via mailop Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 7:03:52 AM To: mailop Subject: [mailop] Reg. Virginmedia SMC Policy Violation bounce error Hi, We're an

Re: [mailop] Good Hosting Suggestions?

I agree that Linode is proactive and want to do the right thing. Cheap self provisioned hosting attracts a lot of abuse though and they have their work cut out for them --srs From: mailop on behalf of Allen Kitchen (zoominternet) via mailop Sent: Saturday,

Re: [mailop] When RBLs go bad

A better question would be who here is actually using it on their servers. --srs From: mailop on behalf of André Peters via mailop Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 12:12:00 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] When RBLs go bad Hi, Have you guys already

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: Some Days I think that Gmail isn't even trying to stop outbound spam..

I did talk to an individual some years back – yes, at a bar, believe it or not – who sincerely believed that the “junk” folder was a place where he could archive all his email that he wanted to keep but didn’t want to clutter his inbox. From: mailop on behalf of Zack Aab via mailop Date:

Re: [mailop] Firefox Relay

Apple uses privaterelay.appleid.com for such emails. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/sign_in_with_apple/sign_in_with_apple_js/communicating_using_the_private_email_relay_service Spam handling is considerably minimised by the fact that only the app’s owners can communicate with their

Re: [mailop] Contact for spamhaus listing DBL311598

Did you try to reach out to Spamhaus using their documented process? You will get an answer from them, though you may or may not like it. --srs From: mailop on behalf of Lyle Lamb via mailop Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 4:36:47 AM To: mailop@mailop.org

Re: [mailop] diagnosing me.com and mac.com rejections

Ramasubramanian , "mailop@mailop.org" Subject: Re: [mailop] diagnosing me.com and mac.com rejections thank you. I did check and follow the link and I have reached out to apple. We'll see. I just wish that their rejection message had some better error indication. On 11/27/20 5:09

Re: [mailop] diagnosing me.com and mac.com rejections

The last section “contact us” in this page has instructions on how to reach out to Apple to resolve such blocks. If you’re a sender / esp please follow the best practices listed on that page before you reach out https://support.apple.com/en-asia/HT204137 -srs --srs

Re: [mailop] JSON mail server logs ?

Been around for at least 4 years now. https://blog.cadena-it.com/monitor-backup/exim-logstash-elasticsearch-kibana/ On 20/11/20, 3:44 PM, "mailop on behalf of Peter N. M. Hansteen via mailop" wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:01:36AM +, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote: >

Re: [mailop] JSON mail server logs ?

I've seen stuff like this that converts postfix logs into json and exports them to elasticsearch https://nxlog.co/documentation/nxlog-user-guide/postfix.html On 20/11/20, 1:46 PM, "mailop on behalf of Andrew C Aitchison via mailop" wrote: The has been a request for Exim to have the

Re: [mailop] SSL Cert and Reputation Question

As a threat intel and anti spam person please thank your customer for the new idea, it sounds eminently workable --srs From: mailop on behalf of Tonya Gordon via mailop Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 8:01:00 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] SSL

Re: [mailop] Maximum message size

“be conservative in what yoyu send and generous in what you accept” has its uses when you separate your inbound and outbound mtas. Discuss. From: mailop on behalf of Sidsel Jensen via mailop Reply to: Sidsel Jensen Date: Saturday, 24 October 2020 at 5:50 PM To: mailop Subject: Re: [mailop]

Re: [mailop] Maximum message size

aware of the DOS possibilities with large email sizes, but I thought I'd ask the community to see if I'm behind the times on what we think is too large. -- Original Message -- From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" mailto:ops.li...@gmail.com>> To: "Adam Moffett"

Re: [mailop] Maximum message size

Some of the largest emails I’m seeing over the years are random spams with huge amounts of hashbuster text, that figure out that many spam filters will skip scanning overly large emails. Most regular users these days appear to know about and use file sharing services. --srs

Re: [mailop] Maximum message size

How many providers are going to accept 200 mb emails if you enable this and someone then tries to send one out? --srs From: mailop on behalf of Adam Moffett via mailop Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 10:53:51 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Maximum

Re: [mailop] Adapter form IBM Notes to something more standard?

available? Thank you. Cheers, Dan On 23/09/2020 03:53, Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop wrote: > If you're asking about just IMAP / SMTP over SSL both these are supported by Domino > > So if your users don't want to use the Notes client, that's just fi

Re: [mailop] Adapter form IBM Notes to something more standard?

If you're asking about just IMAP / SMTP over SSL both these are supported by Domino So if your users don't want to use the Notes client, that's just fine for most things (for example if their notes ID file needs to be renewed they can't do that with Thunderbird or Outlook). --srs On

Re: [mailop] firebasestorage.googleapis.com any legitimate uses?

Also page.link which seems to be a firebase hosted / google owned shortener Sample hxxps://fv01zz75.page.link/amTC redirecting to hxxp://dach-sovet.ru/opros?utm=2 On 27/08/20, 6:22 PM, "mailop on behalf of micah anderson via mailop" wrote: Hi, Benoit Panizzon via mailop writes:

Re: [mailop] spearphishing

Perfora is the mail platform for 1&1 - probably the largest webhost in Europe They appear to provide outbound mail relays for their hosted servers instead of allowing all of them to send directly over smtp --srs From: mailop on behalf of Eric Henson via mailop

Re: [mailop] BIMI pilot @ Google

Ramasubramanian Cc: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] BIMI pilot @ Google On 7/25/2020 2:32 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop wrote: > Oh, all I’m saying is that presenting the logo without a proper check or > after being fooled into a proper check would be a problem. And t

Re: [mailop] BIMI pilot @ Google

Oh, all I’m saying is that presenting the logo without a proper check or after being fooled into a proper check would be a problem. And there’d be some creative ways (css? logo included at random other places in the friendly from? etc) spammers would look at mimicking such a logo --srs

Re: [mailop] BIMI pilot @ Google

You’re confusing authentication with reputation A spam domain that signs itself is just emitting signed spam On the other hand if your bank sends you authenticated mail that your server verifies you’re sure it is from their server and not from a hacked machine emitting bank phish --srs

Re: [mailop] anti-abuse policy in RIPE

Is there any point to it Jordi? The “we are not the internet police” crowd will make the same loud noises again and the initiative will be scuttled yet again. Why is continuing to bang one’s head against intransigence a good idea? From: mailop Date: Thursday, 2 April 2020 at 6:53 PM To:

Re: [mailop] Spam from no-re...@sharepointonline.com via outbound.protection.outlook.com

a lot more sophisticated and harder to lock down. --srs From: mailop Date: Sunday, 22 March 2020 at 2:16 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Spam from no-re...@sharepointonline.com via outbound.protection.outlook.com Am 22.03.20 um 08:37 schrieb Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop

Re: [mailop] B2B Spam Filtering - Help

All 3 are the same outfit – mail.com – currently operated by GMX From: mailop Date: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 7:41 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] B2B Spam Filtering - Help Hi all, A client of mine has been consistently seeing spam folder placement at several B2B ISPs,

Re: [mailop] Point of contact with mail.mil / reputation score issues

Having dealt with such a thing before your only way to go is to have the military entity within DoD your client interacts with use their internal processes to report a false positive block. Then hurry up and wait, as the old soldiers advice goes. --srs From:

Re: [mailop] Can someone write me a prescription for a sane MTA? I'm allergic to Postfix.

I can recommend sendmail. Or Lotus Domino. Either will work as an mta but more importantly they’ll cure you of your postfix allergy asap. That said I use Exim too, try it by all means - it is quite nice plus you don’t need to switch to Debian for it or use Debians rather idiosyncratic

Re: [mailop] Blank emails to office 365

Headers and a sample body would be great (not hotmail or Microsoft here) --srs From: mailop on behalf of Tim Bray via mailop Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 3:40 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Blank emails to office 365 Hi, Weird problem. We

Re: [mailop] delivery problems from mimecast.com

Ask Nat Borenstein, he runs Mimecast :). That said there are plenty of free CAs available that should work for you. —srs From: mailop on behalf of Claus Assmann via mailop Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 2:55 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop]

Re: [mailop] Junk filtering as a tool for unfair competition

On 24/10/19, 11:43 AM, "mailop on behalf of Thomas Walter via mailop" wrote: >Users can not be trusted to categorize emails. Not one user no. Neither can a single voter be trusted with the decision of who gets to rule a country. Yes sometimes the aggregate of all the voters - or all

Re: [mailop] Any t-online.de admins here?

Giving your users IMAP might be an interesting idea. From: mailop on behalf of Eike Armbrust Date: Friday, 25 January 2019 at 4:19 PM To: "mailop@mailop.org" Subject: [mailop] Any t-online.de admins here? Hello everyone! For the third time in the last three months one of our mail

Re: [mailop] Any iCloud admins on this list?

Please follow this process - https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204137 --srs From: mailop on behalf of Scott Southard via mailop Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 1:57 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Any iCloud admins on this list? Hey everyone,

Re: [mailop] Gmail - Anybody out there from Gmail, willing to assist with strange reputation issue

Is it hard to remove them from your service for non compliance with your terms of use policy as well? On 03/09/18, 5:44 PM, "mailop on behalf of Jan Schapmans" wrote: - customer is doing some bad practices and it's hard to make them change :-)

Re: [mailop] Orange.fr and Wanadoo.fr Hardbounces

For a 1990s throwback, here is the website for xmailserver http://www.xmailserver.org/ On 05/07/18, 4:56 PM, "mailop on behalf of Benoit Panizzon" wrote: Hi Erme I've seen similar problems with ISP using, as I recall, something sounding like 'xmailserver' as SMTP Server.

Re: [mailop] Anyone from Yahoo ?

Observe what issue?  Looks like a block that is still in place so you need to reach out to Yahoo. From: mailop on behalf of Vaibhav Date: Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 10:24 AM To: Subject: [mailop] Anyone from Yahoo ?

Re: [mailop] Icloud Dmarc policy rejection

Headers and delivery logs would be great. Please reach out at icloudad...@apple.com https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204137 —srs From: mailop on behalf of Andy Onofrei via mailop Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018

Re: [mailop] question regarding support for international characters

The subject is fine. Email addresses have a very limited character set possible. Received headers had better stay pure ASCII. Would that work? From: mailop on behalf of Annalivia Ford Sent: Monday, April 9,

Re: [mailop] [OUTLOOK] Michael, Can you jump on shutting down this Fake Apple Sender right away

y day with other hats on today.. from your Apple ID account page at https://appleid.apple.com/ But I think someone snipped that URL already.. On 18-03-01 02:09 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Got a phish URL for me? Thanks. Not sure I saw the previous email to this one > > --srs &

Re: [mailop] [OUTLOOK] Michael, Can you jump on shutting down this Fake Apple Sender right away

Got a phish URL for me? Thanks. Not sure I saw the previous email to this one --srs On 01/03/18, 2:04 PM, "mailop on behalf of Michael Rathbun" wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:00:07 -0800, Michael Peddemors

Re: [mailop] GSuites looking too closely at first-hop Received: headers?

:56 AM Subject: Re: [mailop] GSuites looking too closely at first-hop Received: headers? To: mailop <mailop@mailop.org> On 2018-02-27 18:18:49 (+0545), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > That is the apricot conference AS and netblock - used only for the > apricot conference and not random

Re: [mailop] GSuites looking too closely at first-hop Received: headers?

That is the apricot conference AS and netblock - used only for the apricot conference and not random IP space provided by a local ISP in Kathmandu where you currently are. Quite clean but it won’t get used at all between

Re: [mailop] The "goo.gl" shortner is OUT OF CONTROL (+ invaluement's response)

Does this code by Steve Freegard just use curl or does it follow javascript redirects?(haven't checked yet) For curl all you need is curl -sIL and look for the Location: tagged lines But that won't follow anything that depends on javascript instead of http redirects to reach the final

Re: [mailop] Postmaster contact for 1&1

His users might want to receive mail from 1&1 users, and 1&1 outbounds being on spamhaus stops this from happening? In cases like this, it is up to 1&1 to work out the block, rather than expecting operators to put in place a whitelist. --srs On 14/02/18, 3:17 PM, "mailop on behalf of Stefan

Re: [mailop] Earthlink Unblock Requests

+1 to Al. Also I thought the fun old days of obscure dnsbls run by cranks was long gone, I’m happy (!) to see that nothing much has changed. --srs > On 18-Oct-2017, at 6:39 AM, Al Iverson wrote: > > This is uncalled for. Casey is a very nice person who has worked

Re: [mailop] Help with a header.

Way way coincidental that an old nanae regulars email is in the headers and > The biggest clue for me was the gap in time stamps, as if something was > periodically polling the original Gmail mailbox. #NotAllClients Especially not procmail feeding to a random spam reporting perl script which

Re: [mailop] Help with a header.

gt; wrote: > >> On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:25 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.li...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Bounce feature in pine / elm / mutt > > Wouldn't a bounce to back to the original sender? > > Or are you suggesting that the message is being redirected using

Re: [mailop] Help with a header.

Bounce feature in pine / elm / mutt The strredwolf guy is an antispammer who used to be regular on nanae so old fashioned enough to still use this --srs > On 29-Sep-2017, at 5:28 AM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote: > >> On 09/28/2017 04:38 PM, Luke Martinez via mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

Or you have a new customer, or a new list, that has issues.  Considered that possibility? From: mailop on behalf of Vaibhav Date: Monday, 11 September 2017 at 1:22 PM To: Subject: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP

Re: [mailop] myapple.com MX points to 127.0.0.6

Ack from Apple. Peer - Please follow up offlist, I emailed you from my work address. --srs On 03-Sep-2017, at 7:19 PM, Aaron Richton wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Sep 2017, Peer Heinlein wrote: >> >> Somebody here from Apple? >> >> They're sending mails from @myapple.com

Re: [mailop] btinternet.com blacklist

I’m afraid it is much like driving these days. Or maybe manufacturing cars. Back in the day any old inventor could tinker in his backyard and come up with something that had four wheels and an engine. And driving it didn’t really need too much of a license. These days, you get a much

Re: [mailop] btinternet.com blacklist

Back during the old nanae and spam-l days in the 90s and 2000s, whenever this came up, and it did a lot even with filters a lot less hair trigger than what we have today, the usual analogy wasn't people partying next door, it was usually compared to renting an apartment in a high crime area so

Re: [mailop] Pharma Content to Microsoft

You could email him directly you know .. --srs > On 24-Jun-2017, at 7:44 AM, Chris Truitt wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > My name is ChrisTruitt. I handle deliverability for MNG Direct. The company > sends pharma content that is approved by a number of major pharma

Re: [mailop] What are "printing ASCII characters" RFC 850/2822 (was: Re: Lotus Notes and "250 2.6.0 Bad message, but will be delivered anyway"))

Eh? I've not seen that, somehow The typical notes message id is something like this - this is from an ancient version but the format hasn't changed Message-ID: --srs > On 09-Jun-2017, at 7:52 PM, Benoit Panizzon

Re: [mailop] So, about this iOS10 unsubscribe feature...

Something that reproduces this issue would be great. Saves us all playing the guessing game. --srs > On 24-May-2017, at 10:06 AM, Bill Cole > wrote: > > That is not a reasonable expectation. > > > Or rather, it's a reasonable 90% expectation and

Re: [mailop] Zoho hat/reputation check

They're mostly hosted email and ab...@zoho.com works. --srs > On 21-Apr-2017, at 9:16 PM, Steve Ratzlaff wrote: > > I'm not familiar at all with their abuse handling or history. I don't recall > seeing them discussed, or having seen issues ourselves. Do they have similar

Re: [mailop] LOUDMOUTHS WANTED!! ICANN WHOIS Replacement Work URGENT IMPORTANT ACTION NEEDED

I have a hotmail account that I opened in 2000 And yes, I do see the childish style of argument that you mention. --srs > On 27-Mar-2017, at 2:28 AM, John Levine wrote: > > But I can't help noticing that people keep trying to change the topic. > Once again, nobody* has a

Re: [mailop] LOUDMOUTHS WANTED!! ICANN WHOIS Replacement Work URGENT IMPORTANT ACTION NEEDED

Namecheap is in a minority as far as private registrations routing to the customer are concerned. --srs > On 26-Mar-2017, at 7:14 AM, Eric Tykwinski wrote: > > f there’s a private registration service not forwarding notices, than bring > them up and name and shame.

Re: [mailop] LOUDMOUTHS WANTED!! ICANN WHOIS Replacement Work URGENT IMPORTANT ACTION NEEDED

Oh, you were responding to a comment about some registrars (actually a single Chinese outfit that seems to get a resellership at multiple tiny registrars) scraping Whois to convince domain name holders to switch their service right? --srs > On 26-Mar-2017, at 6:08 AM, Doug Barton

Re: [mailop] LOUDMOUTHS WANTED!! ICANN WHOIS Replacement Work URGENT IMPORTANT ACTION NEEDED

And maybe figure out which registrar it is that is trying to steal their customers and using whatever process ICANN has to stop them. --srs > On 26-Mar-2017, at 2:00 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > > A lot? Probably? But that's part of being a domain holder. IMO the

  1   2   >