Am 19.10.22 um 18:25 schrieb Michael Peddemors via mailop:
On 2022-10-19 08:38, Carsten Schiefner via mailop wrote:
Grant & all -
if it‘s a .de domain name one does not need a privacy service any
longer since 2018(?) as the GDPR (or its interpretation) mandates that
holder data must not be
Hi,
Am 19.10.22 um 14:42 schrieb Kai 'wusel' Siering via mailop:
Moin,
on 19.10.22 13:33, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
I'm not sure how to complain and where. But I hope that here we can
start a discussion again. I'm quite upset.
Personally I doubt any discussion on whatever
Hi,
Am 19.10.22 um 14:28 schrieb Bernardo Reino via mailop:
On 2022-10-19 13:33, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure how to complain and where. But I hope that here we can
start a discussion again. I'm quite upset.
Is this the new world?
A given mailhost (ran privately
Am 07.09.21 um 00:47 schrieb Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop:
All,
I know someone who is setting up a business domain, and needs an inbox host.
Her registrar/webhost is GoDaddy and they are discontinuing their free hosted
email, and referring people to paid Office365. It seems that all of
Hi,
I see increasing reports that sending from MS365 (and similar) fails
with messages like these:
Server at *.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com returned '550 5.4.318
Message expired, connection reset (SuspiciousRemoteServerError)(450
4.4.318 Connection was
closed abruptly
Am 13.04.21 um 17:29 schrieb Stuart Henderson via mailop:
On 2021/04/13 11:11, Wolfgang Rosenauer via mailop wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing issues with GMail not recognizing a valid DKIM signature.
Message is correctly signed like:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256;
GMail reports
dkim=neutral
Hi,
I'm seeing issues with GMail not recognizing a valid DKIM signature.
Message is correctly signed like:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256;
GMail reports
dkim=neutral (no key)
while most DKIM validators (incl. dmarcian) are totally fine with the
provided key.
The only reason I could
Am 07.04.21 um 10:51 schrieb Laura Atkins via mailop:
Forcing alignment across all 3 entities (5321.from, 5322.from and the
d=) breaks a lot of current implementations. Many ESPs and a ton of
small businesses are going to be scrambling to get this implemented. In
many cases they have the
Am 27.03.21 um 18:15 schrieb John Levine via mailop:
It appears that Wolfgang Rosenauer via mailop
said:
Yes, there are such cases but I don't think they apply for this list.
Yes - the list breaks DKIM (which is already something which should be
avoided since I do not see a need to modify
Am 27.03.21 um 15:43 schrieb Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop:
Am 27.03.21 um 15:29 schrieb Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop:
One problem with SPF/DKIM/DMARC is that due to non-malicious manipulation of
messages (for example forwarding etc.)
messages may look invalid at the receiving site.
I just
10 matches
Mail list logo
