On 02/09/16 18:35, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Renaud Allard via mailop
> wrote:
On 09/02/2016 10:28 AM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> The spam team would love to send all unauthed mail to the spam label or
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:12 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>But I'm not sure what native would look like. After Lavabit, would the
>>type of folks who use pgp actually trust our implementation if they
>>couldn't see it and verify it?
>
> In my experience there are two kinds of PGP
>But I'm not sure what native would look like. After Lavabit, would the
>type of folks who use pgp actually trust our implementation if they
>couldn't see it and verify it?
In my experience there are two kinds of PGP users. One is the hard
core who go to key signing parties with their passports
On Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:27:39 -0400, Jim Popovitch said:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Brandon Long via mailop
> wrote:
> > The spam team would love to send all unauthed mail to the spam label or even
> > reject it (they call it no auth no entry).
> I'd love to see "no auth
of the swamp.
--adam
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Aaron C. de Bruyn
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 12:36 PM
To: Renaud Allard <ren...@allard.it>
Cc: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Google: Increase in false positives?
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:39 AM,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Laura Atkins
wrote:
> Gmail is pretty smart, they do a “best guess” SPF where if the sending IP
> is the same as your MX then it’s considered authed even if it’s not
> explicitly set. That covers a lot of small servers that aren’t
>
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Renaud Allard via mailop
wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 10:28 AM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> > The spam team would love to send all unauthed mail to the spam label or
> > even reject it (they call it no auth no entry).
> >
>
> IMHO, that would be
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Brandon Long wrote:
> or even reject it (they call it no auth no entry)
I would think that's a step too far lol. Far too many people don't have SPF
or DKIM.
Going to spam doesn't seem too unreasonable though.
Cheers,
Louis Crossing | VentraIP
On 09/02/2016 10:28 AM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> The spam team would love to send all unauthed mail to the spam label or
> even reject it (they call it no auth no entry).
>
IMHO, that would be a good idea. If one big player does it, no-one can
ignore it, so this enables the others to
The spam team would love to send all unauthed mail to the spam label or
even reject it (they call it no auth no entry).
We're not there yet, though. Though, we mostly do that for ipv6 at this
point, and we're cranking on all of the big pieces that are remaining.
But that's probably not the
Just wondering if anyone else has noticed a *huge* uptick in false
positives with GMail or Google Apps?
Before this week, I'd get one legit messages in spam folder every month or
two.
This week, lots of stuff from mailing lists (several on Google Groups) is
going to spam as well as a few
11 matches
Mail list logo