Re: [mapserver-users] WFS – version relat ed problem

2010-06-01 Thread Yewondwossen Assefa
On 31/05/2010 12:25 PM, Stefanie Weykam wrote: Dear list members, I am having trouble with parsing the GetCapabilities response from my WFS services: If I send a GetCapabilities-request indicating VERSION=1.0.0 – metadata having non ascii characters (like characters with accent) are parsed

[mapserver-users] Styling a mapfile with SLD?

2010-06-01 Thread paalkr
Hi all! I'm trying to sett up a MapService that uses OGC SLD to override the regular MapServer rendering rules (classes and styles). For some reason MapServer does not seem to pick up the SLD, because the resulting map uses the default drawing rules defined in the map-file rather then the SLD.

[mapserver-users] Styling a mapfile with SLD?

2010-06-01 Thread paalkr
Hi all! I'm trying to sett up a MapService that uses OGC SLD to override the regular MapServer rendering rules (classes and styles). For some reason MapServer does not seem to pick up the SLD, because the resulting map uses the default drawing rules defined in the map-file rather then the SLD.

RE: [mapserver-users] Tiger Line Style File

2010-06-01 Thread Eric Weisbender
I have the Tiger Line files. I would like a style definition for the Tiger Line files for my map file. I'm just trying to save some time not defining them my self. Thanks, EW ___ mapserver-users mailing list mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [mapserver-users] Styling a mapfile with SLD?

2010-06-01 Thread Jörg Thomsen
Hi, and thanks for the 2nd try with a readable mail ;) paalkr wrote: Hi all! I'm trying to sett up a MapService that uses OGC SLD to override the regular MapServer rendering rules (classes and styles). For some reason MapServer does not seem to pick up the SLD, because the resulting map uses

[mapserver-users] Re: [mapserver-dev] MapScript resultsGetShape confusion

2010-06-01 Thread Christian Jauvin
Hi Daniel, Thanks for the answer! In my context, I always need to retrieve a feature from the results of a query, so I should always be using resultsGetShape if I understand you correctly. The problem I have is with Python-MapScript version 5.6.3, included with MS4W beta 11. For instance with

Re: [mapserver-users] MapScript resultsGetShape confusion

2010-06-01 Thread Daniel Morissette
Christian Jauvin wrote: The solution I found is to replace the call to resultsGetShape by a call to getFeature: shp = layer.getFeature(res.shapeindex) but then the fact that it works contradicts your explanation, so I am even more confused I guess! It is possible that for shapefiles, the

Re: [mapserver-users] MapScript resultsGetShape confusion

2010-06-01 Thread Christian Jauvin
Hi Daniel, About the Python issue, if you can file a ticket with a small testcase to reproduce (data + mapfile + exact steps to reproduce) then one of us could try to have a look. I just checked using the latest python-mapscript 5.6.3-2~lucid1 package from UbuntuGIS, and it has the same

Re: [mapserver-users] MapScript resultsGetShape confusion

2010-06-01 Thread Daniel Morissette
Christian Jauvin wrote: Hi Daniel, About the Python issue, if you can file a ticket with a small testcase to reproduce (data + mapfile + exact steps to reproduce) then one of us could try to have a look. I just checked using the latest python-mapscript 5.6.3-2~lucid1 package from UbuntuGIS,

Re: [mapserver-users] MapScript resultsGetShape confusion

2010-06-01 Thread Christian Jauvin
Errr... sorry, all that time I thought you were using shapefiles. In fact I use both, but then it's only the PG connection type that is causing the issue. I did what you suggested, and added: CONFIG MS_ERRORFILE error file CONFIG CPL_DEBUG ON DEBUG 5 to my mapfile, and performed my query

Re: [mapserver-users] MapScript resultsGetShape confusion

2010-06-01 Thread Daniel Morissette
Christian Jauvin wrote: I did what you suggested, and added: CONFIG MS_ERRORFILE error file CONFIG CPL_DEBUG ON DEBUG 5 Did you also include DEBUG 5 inside the POSTGIS layer itself? to my mapfile, and performed my query again. It generated a very long file (200K+ lines!) with only two