Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-16 Thread Daniel Morissette
On 11-05-14 03:21 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote: However the desired scale range (MINSCALEDENOM, MAXSCALEDENOM) could indeed be taken into account when accessing the source layers, by using a minor change. If that's not the case already then I think MINSCALEDENOM, MAXSCALEDENOM from the source

Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-16 Thread Tamas Szekeres
Hi Daniel, Good point. I've just been waiting for someone more proficient than me, who confirms that this approach makes sense ;-) Best regards, Tamas 2011/5/16 Daniel Morissette dmorisse...@mapgears.com On 11-05-14 03:21 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote: However the desired scale range

Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-16 Thread Daniel Morissette
On 11-05-16 08:56 AM, Tamas Szekeres wrote: Hi Daniel, Good point. I've just been waiting for someone more proficient than me, who confirms that this approach makes sense ;-) Well, that's my thinking, but we could also see what others on the -dev list think before making the final call.

Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-16 Thread Jana Golinowski
Good point. I've just been waiting for someone more proficient than me, who confirms that this approach makes sense ;-) Best regards, Tamas 2011/5/16 Daniel Morissette dmorisse...@mapgears.com mailto:dmorisse...@mapgears.com On 11-05-14 03:21 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote: However

RE: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-16 Thread Lime, Steve D (DNR)
] Question on rfc 86 Good point. I've just been waiting for someone more proficient than me, who confirms that this approach makes sense ;-) Best regards, Tamas 2011/5/16 Daniel Morissette dmorisse...@mapgears.com mailto:dmorisse...@mapgears.com On 11-05-14 03:21 PM, Tamas Szekeres

Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-15 Thread Tamas Szekeres
Hi Josh, The UNION layer doen't remove the source layers it refers to, so those would be displayed in the legend as well. Would this provide the expected result even so? Best regards, Tamas 2011/5/15 Josh Hevenor jheve...@rogers.com Thanks Tamas, The legend is custom build by mapscript

Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-15 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Puolesta Josh Hevenor Lähetetty: 15. toukokuuta 2011 5:02 Vastaanottaja: Tamas Szekeres Kopio: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org Aihe: Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86 Thanks Tamas, The legend is custom build

Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-15 Thread Richard Greenwood
Josh Hevenor Lähetetty: 15. toukokuuta 2011 5:02 Vastaanottaja: Tamas Szekeres Kopio: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org Aihe: Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86 Thanks Tamas, The legend is custom build by mapscript and it's a feature of the app that it shows the out of scale layers. I

[mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-14 Thread Josh Hevenor
This may or may not be relevant but reading RFC 68 got me wondering. I have an application that has shape file data for lakes. There are different shapefiles for data with higher accuracy that are used with scale ranges so that only one is drawn at a time. Specifically something like lakes_1_1m,

Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-14 Thread Tamas Szekeres
Josh, The union layer always retrieve all features from the source layers regardless of their visibility. This is because the source layers are hidden in most cases (STATUS OFF) to avoid the duplication of the features drawn. However the desired scale range (MINSCALEDENOM, MAXSCALEDENOM) could

Re: [mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

2011-05-14 Thread Josh Hevenor
Thanks Tamas, The legend is custom build by mapscript and it's a feature of the app that it shows the out of scale layers. I could customize it to group layers that are essentially the same thing if there was a need for it, but I figured I'd see if this new feature would do that for me for free