Hi All,
I'm posting further findings and observations. I made a simple
mapfile and dumped the shape information to a .shp file. I have made
a .zip file with all of the components to verify what I will be
saying, and will provided it upon request to individuals (don't want
to pollute inboxes on
Matthew Pettis wrote:
So the point is, my WMS map calls stretch as a function of the image
width and height (which is how it is called for openlayers). If I
want the unprojected map via WMS (that doesn't stretch based on the
tile image dimensions), how do I configure my WMS url, or .map file
Hi All,
Thanks to everyone that contributed. The mapfile that renders (thanks
to Tom [Burlington] Kralidis for it) is below. I am still working on
it not being the projection that makes the state of MN look short and
squat. If anyone wants a screenshot, contact me and i'll send it to
you
Hi,
It looks like your mixing up several things that shouldn't be mixed:
1)
http://localhost/cgi-bin/mapserv.exe?map=C:\ms4w\Apache\htdocs\ol\wms.mapSE
RVICE=WMSVERSION=1.1.1REQUEST=GetCapabilities
...is a valid WMS GetCapabilities request. It might result in a valid WMS
response (although I
Thank you! I will try this, and the explanation was helpful.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Barend Kobben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like your datastore's SRS is 4326 (latlon on the WGS84). In other
words, the data in your shapefile, database or raster image are (or are
advertised to
Hi Barend, All,
I tried your suggested changes:
...
PROJECTION
init=epsg:4326
END
# Web settings
WEB
IMAGEPATH C:/ms4w/Apache/htdocs/tmp/
IMAGEURL/tmp/
METADATA
Maybe you could attach your entire .map file for the mailing list to
see.
---
Jeff McKenna
FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
On 9-Jun-08, at 4:44 PM, Matthew Pettis wrote:
Hi Barend, All,
I tried your suggested changes:
Will do. Here it is below:
===
MAP
#
http://localhost/cgi-bin/mapserv.exe?map=C:\ms4w\Apache\htdocs\ol\wms.mapSERVICE=WMSVERSION=1.1.1REQUEST=GetCapabilities
#
Hi,
I have not followed this discussion closely, but at least map extents and map
level projection do not match. It may not have any effect on WMS but it does
not harm if they were correct.
EXTENT 184056.505 4809728.25 767381.245 5478975.75
...
PROJECTION
init=epsg:4326
END
