On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:27 PM, samson goddy
wrote:
> should we use the adventage of the monetizing
My point of view is that we "monetize" through CTAs and fundraising, rather
than wait 27 years to get the resources we need through random ads.
Sean.
___
We are skipping the main question here, Google Ad grants is based on keyword
which SL would definitely join. But what i am saying is that, we need to have a
youtube channel. SL is the only non-profit organization that i know of, that
does not have a youtube channel. Even OLPC do have youtube c
Yes Samson, the SFC fulfills these criteria. I am sure we would qualify.
But as Adam says, let's sort out what we want to do first before going to
the SFC. First step is a donor link which lands on their page with SL as
prefilled choice.
I suggest we try to go for Google Ad Grants, but this requir
sean can you check this out, i don't think we are qualified for this,
https://www.google.com/nonprofits/account/signup/us?hl=en
From: sdaly...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:46:04 +0200
Subject: Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] Smart way to get $$ for posting videos
on youtube
To: samsongo...@h
yeah, very similar to what i am saying. It's almost the same just that this
pays faster. I can do much with it because Nigeria is not among selected
countries, maybe dave or you can apply but we still need youtube channels.
Samson
From: sdaly...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:46:04 +0200
S
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
> How about "turtle in a box" videos? That would be aligned with our
> mission/vision :)
Indeed! if there is any way to generate zillions of views it's with turtles
;-)
___
Marketing mailing list
M
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Sean DALY wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> I am eager to see real data on this
>
>
>
> YouTube advertiser RPM (revenue per thousand views), called eCPM by
> YouTube ("effective cost per thousand"), commonly varies from 50 US c
Samson - what about Google's program for nonprofits?
https://www.google.com/grants/
Sean
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, samson goddy
wrote:
>
> okay i am going to create an open doc in google then explain further about
> the video ads. The youtube ads is not as you think, that's why me and
okay i am going to create an open doc in google then explain further about the
video ads. The youtube ads is not as you think, that's why me and dave will
submit a doc to explain more about the youtube ads.
From: sdaly...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:27:57 +0200
To: d...@lab6.com
CC: marke
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> I am eager to see real data on this
YouTube advertiser RPM (revenue per thousand views), called eCPM by YouTube
("effective cost per thousand"), commonly varies from 50 US cents to $5
(before Google's Adsense 45% cut). I say commonly, bec
yeah sounds cool. Hi dave i am online on hangout, lets chat over there so we
can create an open doc in google about the project
> From: d...@lab6.com
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:24:28 -0600
> To: h...@laptop.org
> CC: marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org;
> i...@lists.su
On 3 June 2016 at 09:17, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>> Adam, please could you confirm with Conservancy that we can set up
>> adsense and youtube advertising accounts to raise revenue?
>
> I don't see why not, if there is a genuine consensus to mov
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Adam, please could you confirm with Conservancy that we can set up
> adsense and youtube advertising accounts to raise revenue?
>
I don't see why not, if there is a genuine consensus to move forward here?
But most important who will manage
On 3 June 2016 at 08:34, Sean DALY wrote:
> I'm saying random ads will generate peanuts, while well-thought out
> fundraising will generate resources greater than peanuts.
I am eager to see real data on this. I hope you are proven right :D
___
Marketing
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> I'm not saying if $X or $Y is greater; I am saying that we don't know
> which is greater, and Samson will learn a lot by trying to maximize
> the revenue of both.
>
In that case, I'm saying random ads will generate peanuts, while
well-thou
On 3 June 2016 at 04:42, Sean DALY wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>> Your assertion that SL would see more revenue from CTA compared to ads.
>
> How can I make up data for a fundraising drive which hasn't happened yet?
You can't ;) That's exactly my point :)
__
Adam, please could you confirm with Conservancy that we can set up
adsense and youtube advertising accounts to raise revenue?
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
On 3 June 2016 at 07:39, Walter Bender wrote:
> Virtual all of the money raised so far by Sugar Labs has been in targeted
> requests: Trip Advisor, Gould, Nokia (never signed)... I think there is lots
> of evidence that these focused approaches are effective. Is that not
> evidence in support of S
Virtual all of the money raised so far by Sugar Labs has been in targeted
requests: Trip Advisor, Gould, Nokia (never signed)... I think there is
lots of evidence that these focused approaches are effective. Is that not
evidence in support of Sean's assertion, or am I misinterpreting something?
-w
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Your assertion that SL would see more revenue from CTA compared to ads.
How can I make up data for a fundraising drive which hasn't happened yet?
Sean
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.
Google doc will do.
> From: d...@lab6.com
> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 23:06:16 -0600
> To: samsongo...@hotmail.com
> CC: marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org;
> sam.parkins...@gmail.com; sam...@greenfeld.org
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Smart way to get $$ for posting video
21 matches
Mail list logo
