Hi,
Hylke Bons wrote:
I am very much against this.
Gnome reminds of the the imaginary tiny creatures.
I agree with Hylke.
GNOME is better than Gnome.
Something completely different might be better again... we don't have a
huge amount of brand equity worldwide for GNOME, perhaps it's time
As we think about how to increase our subscriber numbers, this article
had some interesting points about membership.
Eight Strategic Mistakes with Memberships
http://www.blueavocado.org/node/508
In particular, I don't think we give donors a good idea of how their
donations change the world
Hi Guys
At least now I know what GNOME is an acronym for :) - thanks Hylke. I am
working on our mobile fund raising plan and many a times the question came
up:
Who are we?
Why are we in this business?
What's our grand vision?
At least I could not find a consistent answer (I think I understand the
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 02.04.2010, 12:19 -0600 schrieb Jason D. Clinton:
If we're going to do this, 3.0 seems like the perfect opportunity. I
think that we should decide how we feel as the Marketing Team leading
up to the Zaragoza, Spain hackfest and try and come to a final
decision by then.
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 08:08 -0500 schrieb Bharat Kapoor:
At least now I know what GNOME is an acronym for :)
The talk is about name or rename (if our mission is consistent with)
GNU Network Object Model Environment
Once again: GNOME WAS an acronym. GNOME is NOT anymore an acronym.
GNOME
Hi Stormy,
I think I haven't replied yet but it sounds like a good idea to take
the a11y proposals into consideration for the pre-conference.
Papers-team, what do you think? Sense, or Crhistophe, can you grant me
the rights to see the proposals?
best,
Sanne
Stormy Peters schreef:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Sven Herzberg he...@gnome-de.org wrote:
Am Freitag, den 02.04.2010, 12:19 -0600 schrieb Jason D. Clinton:
If we're going to do this, 3.0 seems like the perfect opportunity. I
think that we should decide how we feel as the Marketing Team leading
up to the
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Stormy Peters sto...@gnome.org wrote:
As we think about how to increase our subscriber numbers, this article
had some interesting points about membership.
Eight Strategic Mistakes with Memberships
http://www.blueavocado.org/node/508
In particular, I don't
I would prefer Gnome to GNOME but not enough to push for it now.
Perhaps we could come up with new words for the acronym. You'd be surprised
how often I get asked what it stands for.
GNOME
So it was:
GNU Network Object Model Environment
What could it be? (I personally can't think of anything
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Stormy Peters sto...@gnome.org wrote:
As we think about how to increase our subscriber numbers, this article
had some interesting points about membership.
Eight Strategic Mistakes
Something completely different might be better again... we don't have a
huge amount of brand equity worldwide for GNOME, perhaps it's time to
consider a rename? Although I can live with GNOME...
Our brand recognition seems to be mostly within the FOSS group. People
really don't know GNOME
+1
I've mailed something only to Dave by mistake regarding some of the
dangers of Re-Branding.
Dave, feel free to forward to list, as it was my mistake on not hitting
reply all.
I pointed before also to Dave the following:
* If GNOME is expecting some negative feedback on GNOME 3.0,
Hi Andre,
Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 08:08 -0500 schrieb Bharat Kapoor:
At least now I know what GNOME is an acronym for :)
The talk is about name or rename (if our mission is consistent with)
GNU Network Object Model Environment
Once again: GNOME WAS an acronym.
El mar, 06-04-2010 a las 18:28 +0200, Dave Neary escribió:
Hi Andre,
Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 08:08 -0500 schrieb Bharat Kapoor:
At least now I know what GNOME is an acronym for :)
The talk is about name or rename (if our mission is consistent with)
GNU Network
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 18:28 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi Andre,
Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 08:08 -0500 schrieb Bharat Kapoor:
At least now I know what GNOME is an acronym for :)
The talk is about name or rename (if our mission is consistent with)
GNU Network
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 18:05 +0100 schrieb Nelson Marques:
I don't know if someone who has legal knowledge of this can support or
enlighten people.
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/legal-list ? :-)
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ |
GNOME Marketing Team
Over the past several months, I have been trading emails with the OLPC
and SugarLabs folks about an opportunity to create a t-shirt to
promote that GNOME free software benefits humanitarian projects like
OLPC and Sugar Labs, and to provide a nice reward for volunteers
Cool concept...more below
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:08 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
I was thinking that we could make two versions of the t-shirt. One
version to sell for $20 that has nothing on the back. A second
version
will have the following text on the back and would be given away for
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 11:35 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Hylke Bons wrote:
I am very much against this.
Gnome reminds of the the imaginary tiny creatures.
I agree with Hylke.
GNOME is better than Gnome.
My opinion on this is that GNOME is better that Gnome because we are
used
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 08:08 -0500, Bharat Kapoor wrote:
Hi Guys
I am working on our mobile fund raising plan and many a times the
question came up:
Who are we?
Why are we in this business?
What's our grand vision?
At least I could not find a consistent answer (I think I understand
the
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 23:48 +0200 schrieb Juanjo Marin:
BTW, as far as I know, the GNOME uses Trebuchet MS [1] (correct me if
I'm wrong) and I think it is time to change it.
Wrong, see http://live.gnome.org/BrandGuidelines ...
andre
[PS: Please do not CC me. I am subscribed to this
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:08 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
With the photo would appear the following text:
[GNOME Logo] Free Software - Powering [OLPC logo] [Sugar Labs logo]
Perhaps some additional text under the photograph or under the logo
would be nice like Helping previously
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 00:20 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
BTW, as far as I know, the GNOME uses Trebuchet MS [1] (correct me if
I'm wrong) and I think it is time to change it.
Wrong, see http://live.gnome.org/BrandGuidelines ...
OK, then it is OK for me. It resembles so much the MS Trebuchet
23 matches
Mail list logo
