Hey Jason,
Awesome work! I love the format and the music!
Just one suggestion, I have the feeling that transitions between the
desktop and you standing are a bit too slow. For example, the second
time you show up, there's more time of transitioning than you
explaining to the camera, which isn't v
Brian Cameron wrote:
> Allan:
>
> On 03/18/11 04:28 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> > The message, as Olav has already pointed out, is
> > that it is 'fallback', not 'classic' GNOME. It's what you get if you are
> > unlucky enough not to be able to run the full GNOME 3 desktop. It isn't
> > intended as som
Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 22:53, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 19:05, Jason D. Clinton
> > wrote:
> >> A first production attempt of launch video #2 is available here.
> >> Comments, please. The sooner, the better because two more will be
> >> produc
Hello Allan,
I'm actually quite worried about this use case and the impact that 3.0
can have on them. Yes, corporate desktop is not the primary target for
GNOME 3.0, but it is our largest install base by a long shot (schools,
corporations, public entities, universities...). I think there's some
th
2011/3/18 Allan Day
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 12:31 +0800, Emily Chen wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2011/3/12 Frederic Crozat
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Emily Chen
> > wrote:
> > > For Best Photo Competition, in my mind, it is easy to do if
> > we choose one
> >
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Hello Allan,
>
> I'm actually quite worried about this use case and the impact that 3.0
> can have on them. Yes, corporate desktop is not the primary target for
> GNOME 3.0, but it is our largest install base by a long shot (schools,
> corporations, public entities, universit
Hello Allan,
> Do you have any suggestions for our marketing materials in this respect?
> It would be great if you could look over the materials that are
> currently in production. I'll send you them.
Please do!
> Sysadmins in general, or sysadmins in the contexts that Brian wrote
> about? I'm u
Dear all,
I've been told I should post more about the stuff we're doing for
GNOME.Asia Summit here so here a humble attempt.
We have pushed the updated website last night at 3am (luckily, since we
had no Internet the whole day today) and everyone can view it at
http://2011.gnome.asia .
The
Hi,
Allan Day wrote:
> Brian Cameron wrote:
>> I can imagine some situations where a user would want to choose
>> 'fallback' mode. For example, when accessing a remote machine via
>> XDMCP or Xvnc, users would likely find that 'fallback' GNOME performs
>> better - especially if latency is high.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:15:26AM +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> The large deployment sysadmins, basically the users of the distros
> providing corporate desktop (such as RHEL/Solaris/SLED), Dave Richards
> from PGO is probably a good example of the type I'm thiking about. I'm
> unaware of any plans
Nice work! I think these will really make a difference to folks new to GNOME
or wondering about GNOME 3.
Stormy
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> A first production attempt of launch video #2 is available here.
> Comments, please. The sooner, the better because two more
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Jason D. Clinton
wrote:
>
> A "release candidate" is now in the same spot in 4Mbit/s rendering.
> Unless someone finds some problem with it, I say we try uploading this
> one to our YouTube account tomorrow, try embedding it on the
> gnome3.org site with UT, and
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 03:58, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Just one suggestion, I have the feeling that transitions between the
> desktop and you standing are a bit too slow. For example, the second
> time you show up, there's more time of transitioning than you
> explaining to the camera, which isn't v
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:02, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Jason D. Clinton
> wrote:
>>
>> A "release candidate" is now in the same spot in 4Mbit/s rendering.
>> Unless someone finds some problem with it, I say we try uploading this
>> one to our YouTube acc
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 07:15, Dave Neary wrote:
>> In terms of marketing, I'm not sure it makes sense to be targeting these
>> kinds of users right now. In the longer term, it would be useful to see
>> wider discussion about GNOME's approach to these kinds of technical
>> environments.
>
> I buy
Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 07:15, Dave Neary wrote:
>> I buy that, but I think it's important that we have a "who is GNOME 3
>> *not* for (yet)" which covers audiences for whom GNOME 3 is not
>> appropriate. And we need to have a story for them - such as "we
>> recommend y
For side note I wanted to add that I'm very happy that fallback/legacy
mode exists. If we are looking for actual GNOME 3 adaption, this is a
must, because people won't jump to GNOME 3 stright away. They will
move to it gradually.
Cheers and thanks everyone for this superb release!
Peter.
--
mark
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:33, Dave Neary wrote:
> Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> Not my call - I guess Allan & Sumana, in collaboration with the
> board, are fixing priorities for the next 2-3 weeks.
What does the Board have to do with the Marketing Team? Allan and
Sumana, as members of the Marketin
Hi,
Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> What does the Board have to do with the Marketing Team? Allan and
> Sumana, as members of the Marketing Team, are certainly good decision
> makers but the Board should not be doing any top-down management and I
> certainly hope that the Board is not putting Allan and
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 13:16, Dave Neary wrote:
> It appears you're happy telling people what to concentrate on, all I'm
> saying is that I'm not.
I would appreciate it if you would avoid ascribing me to certain
positions that I am not taking.
> But I bet that this will be an issue, and it's
>
Let's not get into arguments over this. I think it is a little late to be
talking about running GNOME 3/Shell over VNC and virtual appliances. We
have a release in less than 3 weeks. If someone is interested in this
problem and interested in working on this messaging then please step up and
volu
Better late than never, I've finished the Q4 update. If anyone has
time to proof it for any big spelling or grammar mistakes, I'd
appreciate the help.
Thanks!
Paul
http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2010-Q4.html
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.
Hi all,
I've been working on the content for the new gnome.org site recently.
There are a couple of pages that I would appreciate feedback on: About
GNOME [1] and Support GNOME [2]. Both are early drafts.
About About GNOME: it's a new version of an existing page [3]. I wanted
it to be a statement
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 15:25, Allan Day wrote:
> About Support GNOME: we don't currently have this, but it seems pretty
> essential to me. I'm sure there are plenty of items that I've missed.
> Tell me what!
I stopped working on the FoG videos here [1] because the FoG site was
going to be redone
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 11:37 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
> Let's not get into arguments over this. I think it is a little late
> to be talking about running GNOME 3/Shell over VNC and virtual
> appliances.
I don't think anyone is talking about fixing it. We are talking about
messaging.
> W
25 matches
Mail list logo
