Hey Jason,
Awesome work! I love the format and the music!
Just one suggestion, I have the feeling that transitions between the
desktop and you standing are a bit too slow. For example, the second
time you show up, there's more time of transitioning than you
explaining to the camera, which isn't
Brian Cameron wrote:
Allan:
On 03/18/11 04:28 AM, Allan Day wrote:
The message, as Olav has already pointed out, is
that it is 'fallback', not 'classic' GNOME. It's what you get if you are
unlucky enough not to be able to run the full GNOME 3 desktop. It isn't
intended as something
Jason D. Clinton wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 22:53, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 19:05, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com
wrote:
A first production attempt of launch video #2 is available here.
Comments, please. The sooner, the better
Hello Allan,
I'm actually quite worried about this use case and the impact that 3.0
can have on them. Yes, corporate desktop is not the primary target for
GNOME 3.0, but it is our largest install base by a long shot (schools,
corporations, public entities, universities...). I think there's some
2011/3/18 Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 12:31 +0800, Emily Chen wrote:
2011/3/12 Frederic Crozat f...@crozat.net
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Emily Chen
emilychen...@gmail.com wrote:
For Best Photo Competition, in my mind, it is easy
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
Hello Allan,
I'm actually quite worried about this use case and the impact that 3.0
can have on them. Yes, corporate desktop is not the primary target for
GNOME 3.0, but it is our largest install base by a long shot (schools,
corporations, public entities,
Hello Allan,
Do you have any suggestions for our marketing materials in this respect?
It would be great if you could look over the materials that are
currently in production. I'll send you them.
Please do!
Sysadmins in general, or sysadmins in the contexts that Brian wrote
about? I'm
Dear all,
I've been told I should post more about the stuff we're doing for
GNOME.Asia Summit here so here a humble attempt.
We have pushed the updated website last night at 3am (luckily, since we
had no Internet the whole day today) and everyone can view it at
http://2011.gnome.asia .
Hi,
Allan Day wrote:
Brian Cameron wrote:
I can imagine some situations where a user would want to choose
'fallback' mode. For example, when accessing a remote machine via
XDMCP or Xvnc, users would likely find that 'fallback' GNOME performs
better - especially if latency is high. If my
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:15:26AM +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
The large deployment sysadmins, basically the users of the distros
providing corporate desktop (such as RHEL/Solaris/SLED), Dave Richards
from PGO is probably a good example of the type I'm thiking about. I'm
unaware of any plans
Nice work! I think these will really make a difference to folks new to GNOME
or wondering about GNOME 3.
Stormy
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.comwrote:
A first production attempt of launch video #2 is available here.
Comments, please. The sooner, the
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com
wrote:
A release candidate is now in the same spot in 4Mbit/s rendering.
Unless someone finds some problem with it, I say we try uploading this
one to our YouTube account tomorrow, try embedding it on the
gnome3.org
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 03:58, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
Just one suggestion, I have the feeling that transitions between the
desktop and you standing are a bit too slow. For example, the second
time you show up, there's more time of transitioning than you
explaining to the camera,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:02, Diego Escalante Urrelo die...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com
wrote:
A release candidate is now in the same spot in 4Mbit/s rendering.
Unless someone finds some problem with it, I say we try uploading
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 07:15, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
In terms of marketing, I'm not sure it makes sense to be targeting these
kinds of users right now. In the longer term, it would be useful to see
wider discussion about GNOME's approach to these kinds of technical
environments.
Jason D. Clinton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 07:15, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
I buy that, but I think it's important that we have a who is GNOME 3
*not* for (yet) which covers audiences for whom GNOME 3 is not
appropriate. And we need to have a story for them - such as we
For side note I wanted to add that I'm very happy that fallback/legacy
mode exists. If we are looking for actual GNOME 3 adaption, this is a
must, because people won't jump to GNOME 3 stright away. They will
move to it gradually.
Cheers and thanks everyone for this superb release!
Peter.
--
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:33, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
Jason D. Clinton wrote:
shrug Not my call - I guess Allan Sumana, in collaboration with the
board, are fixing priorities for the next 2-3 weeks.
What does the Board have to do with the Marketing Team? Allan and
Sumana, as
Hi,
Jason D. Clinton wrote:
What does the Board have to do with the Marketing Team? Allan and
Sumana, as members of the Marketing Team, are certainly good decision
makers but the Board should not be doing any top-down management and I
certainly hope that the Board is not putting Allan and
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 13:16, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
It appears you're happy telling people what to concentrate on, all I'm
saying is that I'm not.
I would appreciate it if you would avoid ascribing me to certain
positions that I am not taking.
But I bet that this will be an
Let's not get into arguments over this. I think it is a little late to be
talking about running GNOME 3/Shell over VNC and virtual appliances. We
have a release in less than 3 weeks. If someone is interested in this
problem and interested in working on this messaging then please step up and
Better late than never, I've finished the Q4 update. If anyone has
time to proof it for any big spelling or grammar mistakes, I'd
appreciate the help.
Thanks!
Paul
http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2010-Q4.html
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
Hi all,
I've been working on the content for the new gnome.org site recently.
There are a couple of pages that I would appreciate feedback on: About
GNOME [1] and Support GNOME [2]. Both are early drafts.
About About GNOME: it's a new version of an existing page [3]. I wanted
it to be a
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 15:25, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
About Support GNOME: we don't currently have this, but it seems pretty
essential to me. I'm sure there are plenty of items that I've missed.
Tell me what!
I stopped working on the FoG videos here [1] because the FoG site was
24 matches
Mail list logo