I'm catching up on my queue from all of the travel I've had, and one of
the items that was on my to do list was to follow up on this trademark
request.
I (and the board) think in this instance the trademark request is
something that the marketing team should weigh in on. Check out the
attached ima
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 23:43 -0400, Karen Sandler wrote:
> I'm catching up on my queue from all of the travel I've had, and one of
> the items that was on my to do list was to follow up on this trademark
> request.
>
> I (and the board) think in this instance the trademark request is
> something th
Hi,
On 04/17/2012 05:43 AM, Karen Sandler wrote:
This says "Powered by GNOME" and I know that some folks wanted us to shy
away from using terms like that or "GNOME Technologies", though I think
it's also necessary to provide ways for folks to say that there are GNOME
components involved in their
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 18:12 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/17/2012 05:43 AM, Karen Sandler wrote:
> > This says "Powered by GNOME" and I know that some folks wanted us to shy
> > away from using terms like that or "GNOME Technologies", though I think
> > it's also necessary to provide wa
I think its good to have a sticker saying powered by GNOME and really
that's shockin that folks don't like that,and about the approval i
think it is approved by design team
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 18:12 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
- Mensaje original -
> De: Bryen M Yunashko
> Para: marketing-list@gnome.org
> CC:
> Enviado: Martes 17 de abril de 2012 18:17
> Asunto: Re: [Fwd: Question about the trademark policy and usage of the GNOME
> logo]
>
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 18:12 +0200,
Hi,
On 04/17/2012 06:17 PM, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
Just out of curiosity, why do some people have issues with "powered by
GNOME" phrase?
To put it in perspective; I considered that we were missing an
opportunity by not putting Mint on the list of GNOME distributions -
Cinnamon is GNOME 3 ba
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 18:24 +0100, Juanjo Marín wrote:
>
>
>
> - Mensaje original -
> > De: Bryen M Yunashko
> > Para: marketing-list@gnome.org
> > CC:
> > Enviado: Martes 17 de abril de 2012 18:17
> > Asunto: Re: [Fwd: Question about the tr
gt; > Enviado: Martes 17 de abril de 2012 18:17
> > > Asunto: Re: [Fwd: Question about the trademark policy and usage of the
> GNOME logo]
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 18:12 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >>
>
> De: Emily Gonyer
>Para: a11yro...@bryen.com
>CC: Juanjo Marín ; "marketing-list@gnome.org"
>
>Enviado: Martes 17 de abril de 2012 19:53
>Asunto: Re: [Fwd: Question about the trademark policy and usage of the GNOME
&
bril de 2012 19:53
> >Asunto: Re: [Fwd: Question about the trademark policy and usage of the GNOME
> >logo]
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Even if a GNOME derivative wanted to say "powered by GNOME" why would
> >>that be a bad thing? We get the benefit o
Para: a11yro...@bryen.com
>> >CC: Juanjo Marín ; "marketing-list@gnome.org"
>> >
>> >Enviado: Martes 17 de abril de 2012 19:53
>> >Asunto: Re: [Fwd: Question about the trademark policy and usage of the
>> >GNOME logo]
>> >
>> &g
> >>
> >>
> >> >________________
> >> > De: Emily Gonyer
> >> >Para: a11yro...@bryen.com
> >> >CC: Juanjo Marín ; "marketing-list@gnome.org"
>
> >> >Enviado: Martes 17 de abril de 2012 19:53
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 19:23 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> Why? Because we would have to argue what set of components is
> equivalent to "powered by GNOME". The argument might seem simple
> until you actually start doing it. There might be maintainers who
> might object to having their projec
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
>
> If they feel some inner sense of ethical duty to pay homage to GNOME
> with "powered by GNOME" labeling, awesome. If they choose not to, their
> right.
>
>
I'm okay with this if they want to volunteer doing that. I'm not going to
compl
15 matches
Mail list logo
