If marxism contains a significant philosophical dimension then it should
have attempted to establish the nature of knowledge and how certain that
knowledge. Questions such as how we have knowledge of the world have not
been adequately answered by marxism. Not even a serious attempt to answer
th
Hi
Have been reading Schlick. Heavish going. Do you know of any online sources
that provide a summary of his philosophy.
Paddy Hackett
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
htt
elant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 10:45:09 +0100 "rasherrs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Thanks Jim
>
> I have been reading On Denoting and stuff related to
arxmail.org/archives/may98/journal_am.htm
Jim F.
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 20:18:32 +0100 "rasherrs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Interesting intro Charles. Much appreciated
>
> Paddy
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
Interesting intro Charles. Much appreciated
Paddy
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic
Theory of descriptions
Jump to: navigat
8 11:47:50 +0100 "rasherrs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Hi
>
> Given that Bertrand Russell rejected verificationism as the
> criterion as to
> what is science, can you tell me what was his criterion or criteria
> for
> identifying science as against non-sci
Hi Jim and others
Perhaps you can help me here. How does the development of symbolic logic by
BR and others apply to logical atomism. How does this logic relate to
propositions and their relationship with each other
Paddy Hackett
___
Marxism-Thaxis
Hi
Given that Bertrand Russell rejected verificationism as the criterion as to
what is science, can you tell me what was his criterion or criteria for
identifying science as against non-science was?
Paddy Hackett
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Ma
3 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Vienna Circle etc.
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:05:10 +0100 "rasherrs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> How does A.J. Ayer fit into this matter of the peculiarities of the
> reception of logical empiricism into the anglophone world. I
> obtained my
>
How does A.J. Ayer fit into this matter of the peculiarities of the
reception of logical empiricism into the anglophone world. I obtained my
initial more direct experience of it throug Ayer's titles?
Paddy Hackett
--
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Th
s] Vienna Circle etc.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:53:37 +0100 "rasherrs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Thank you for the help in relation to the Vienna Circle. It is a
> circle
> that has been much misunderstood in radical left circles. When I was
> in my
> late te
Thank you for the help in relation to the Vienna Circle. It is a circle
that has been much misunderstood in radical left circles. When I was in my
late teens I was led to the view that it was a crassly reactionary group.
Why did Wittgenstein not view himself as a logical positivist? What, if
1 Mar 2008 15:22:21 -0400 "Charles Brown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> rasherrs rasherrs
>
>
-
---
>
> The argument between the Vienna Circle and Karl Popper on the
> matter of
The argument between the Vienna Circle and Karl Popper on the matter of
the verification principle. Popper susbtituted the falsficaion principle for
the verification principle. I believe that this and related issues have been
at best neglected by marxism. Yet is a matter of signifcance.
Th
Iraq is a mess. It is a mess both for capitalism and communism.The
conditions obtaining there dont facilitate the emergence and growth of
communism anymore than the conditions obtaining under Saddam Hussein.It is
a mess for capitalism in the sense that present conditions are not
conducive towar
15 matches
Mail list logo
