I'm not holding my breath. Bad idea for Zen practice anyway.
--- On Tue, 9/22/09, c b wrote:
> From: c b
> Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Paul Cockshott on Leonid Kantorovich and the
> socialist calculation debate revisited
> To: "Forum for the discussion of theoretical
gt; Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Paul Cockshott on Leonid Kantorovich and the
> > socialist calculation debate revisited
> > To: "Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl Marx and
> > the thinkers he inspired" ,
> > marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.u
gt; and you are persuaded by one or the other side you can say,
> well there exist models that show that a nonmarket system,
> maybe like what Marx envisaged, is theoretically possible.
> Or: not.
>
> Anyway, work calleth.
>
> Justin
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On
. Or: not.
Anyway, work calleth.
Justin
--- On Tue, 9/22/09, Ralph Dumain wrote:
> From: Ralph Dumain
> Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Paul Cockshott on Leonid Kantorovich and the
> socialist calculation debate revisited
> To: "Forum for the discussion of theoretical issu
Not that I endorse an exclusive concentration on economic
calculation, but Cockschott's overall perspective can be found here:
21st Century Marxism
http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~wpc/reports/21stCenturyMarxism.htm
At 11:02 AM 9/22/2009, Ralph Dumain wrote:
>Some time ago Jim gave us this reference. I
Some time ago Jim gave us this reference. If you are interested in
Cockshott's analysis of the socialist calculation debate, high-tech
socialism & e-democracy more generally, see his web site:
http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~wpc/reports/
At 09:37 PM 5/24/2009, Jim Farmelant wrote:
>Paul Cockshott o
