Thanks to Brian and Thank You to the working group for the support. A big
welcome to Massimo and Stephen who I fully support as well. I look very
much forward to working with you!
Cheers
Nina
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Stephen Strowes wrote:
> Agreed: thanks to Brian for running the
i recant. i was being too rigid and literal about making a choice.
apologies.
randy
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/mat-wg
Agreed: thanks to Brian for running the process, and thanks to the WG
for the support.
It may have appeared self-serving to engage during the discussion phase
but, for the record, I fully support both Nina and Massimo as co-chairs.
I'm looking forward to working with both!
Cheers,
S.
Thanks Brian and thanks to everybody that participated to the nomination
process in this mailing list.
I cannot wait to work with Nina and Stephen on serving this wg!
Ciao,
Massimo
On 14/04/2022 13:58, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote:
I believe we’re ready to call consensus on this question.
We
I believe we’re ready to call consensus on this question.
We have support for appointing Massimo Candela, Stephen Strowes, and Nina
Bargisen as chairs of MAT WG. Congratulations to the new chairs!
I note that our process of record doesn’t say anything about *when* this change
will be
On 2022-04-13 21:07, Gert Doering wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 01:18:23PM +0200, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote:
Given these themes, and explicitly asking the community to check my
own biases here, I???d like to ask the community if there is support
and consensus for appointing all three
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 01:18:23PM +0200, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote:
> Given these themes, and explicitly asking the community to check my own
> biases here, I???d like to ask the community if there is support and
> consensus for appointing all three candidates (Massimo Candela, Stephen
Hi Randy,
I’ll take your third question first, because it’s the easiest. From RIPE-692
section 2:
> RIPE Working Groups operate under a co-chair model. In this, the co-chairs
> share the responsibility for all tasks involved in chairing their working
> group. The co-chairs act together to
All three are good and have support.
Nina has practical experience as chair. Massimo and Stephen bring different
current work experience. All three are known to support new ideas.
This will be a good chair team with both experience and potential. They will be
good for the WG.
I wager that
> (3) At least one question as to why and whether we can’t have three
> chairs (which we can).
will more members make the group more informative and productive, ow is
it just a social 'compromise' and next time we'll have four ot five?
randy
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a
Greetings, all,
I will be calling consensus on this point tomorrow, but looking over the
feedback received during (and before) the comment period, I see a few themes
emerging I’d like to get some feedback on before making that call:
(1) Support for all three candidates.
(2) A desire for new
Hi all,
I support Massimo.
I have been working in the past with him on the topic of Internet
Measurements and I believe he is a good fit for this role.
Valerio
Il giorno lun 4 apr 2022 alle ore 09:55 Luuk Hendriks
ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue 29 Mar 2022, 20:48, Brian Trammell (RIPE)
Hi all,
On Tue 29 Mar 2022, 20:48, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote:
> The call for interested parties is now closed. Thank you to our candidates
> (in order of received statement of interest):
>
> - Massimo Candela
> - Stephen Strowes
> - Nina Bargisen
>
> This opens the call for discussion on the
Hi all,
Agree that we have excellent candidates here!
I've been following Massimo's work for the last few years and it would be
great to see him chairing the WG.
All the best to all of you.
Cheers,
Amreesh
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
i know and respect the really good work of massimo and stephen.
but i am trying to think who is more likely to breathe some life into
this somewhat soggy working group. and i would suggest that this is the
primary criterion we should stress.
aside from a strong technical contribution, maybe
Hi All,
I worked with Massimo and Stephen, both are excellent candidates.
However, in the past I had a chance to work with Massimo closely on
the RIPE Atlas, and I know his passion towards MAT topics, so if it
goes down to a single vote my preference goes to him.
On Mon, Mar 14 13:45 CET 2022,
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 08:48:01PM +0200, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote:
> The call for interested parties is now closed. Thank you to our candidates
> (in order of received statement of interest):
>
> - Massimo Candela
> - Stephen Strowes
> - Nina Bargisen
>
> This opens the call for
Greetings, all,
The call for interested parties is now closed. Thank you to our candidates (in
order of received statement of interest):
- Massimo Candela
- Stephen Strowes
- Nina Bargisen
This opens the call for discussion on the candidates; the current chairs will
call consensus on 12
Greetings all
I am super excited to see the interest in chairing the MAT-WG. I'd like to
put myself forward to take another turn in co-chairing the working group
. I have co-chaired since 2015 and would like to continue to be part of
the team.
Currently I work for Kentik, the network
Greetings, all,
As a reminder, this call for interest to co-chair MAT-WG is open until next
Monday; please send a note to the list if you’re interested in volunteering as
a co-chair. I’ve seen statements of interest from Massimo Candela and Stephen
Strowes so far.
Thanks, cheers,
Brian (MAT
Dear all,
Disclosure:
* Massimo and I are former colleagues at NTT/AS2914
* Stephen and I currently are colleagues at Fastly/AS54113
Seeing fine folk with strong appetite to contribute to the MAT
working group:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:45:40PM +0100, Massimo Candela wrote:
> I would
Hi all,
I'd also like to put myself forward to co-chair MAT WG.
I always enjoy MAT WG meetings. I'm a big fan of building connections
between people who do network operations and people who do network data
analysis, and MAT is a part of that; I think it's a great venue for
making progress on
Dear working group,
On 14/03/2022 10:14, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote:
If you are interested in co-chairing MAT WG, please make your intent known by
sending a message to mat-wg@ripe.net by Monday 28 March 2022; once we have a
candidate list, wi’ll issue a call for discussion on the list.
Greetings, all,
It has been a while since we have run our chair selection process (see
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/mat-wg/2015-February/000559.html); as
we look to returning to in-person meetings in Berlin it occurred to us that now
would be a good time to do so.
To save you the
24 matches
Mail list logo
